From Fedora Project Wiki
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Participants == | == Participants == | ||
* [[JaroslavReznik]] | * [[JaroslavReznik]] | ||
* [[KevinKofler]] | * [[KevinKofler]] | ||
* [[LukasTinkl]] | * [[LukasTinkl]] | ||
* [[RexDieter]] | * [[RexDieter]] | ||
* [[StevenParrish]] | * [[StevenParrish]] | ||
* [[ThanNgo]] | * [[ThanNgo]] | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| Line 30: | Line 26: | ||
== Meeting minutes == | == Meeting minutes == | ||
[http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-23-16.04.html Meeting minutes] | |||
[http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-23-16.04.log.html Full log] | |||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
'''Kevin_Kofler elected to FESCo, any issues to bring up in the FESCo meeting?''' | |||
* congratulations Kevin! | |||
* next FESCo meeting is on Friday, if you have any issues to bring up in the FESCo meeting, contact Kevin | |||
'''RPM Macros for packaging''' | |||
* MathStuf to take it to mailing list for further discussion | |||
* we should have macros for the common directories, any advantage to have macros for all stuff? | |||
* it can help cleanup SPEC files | |||
* do we need all KDE 3 macros? | |||
'''critical path packages - does it affect us? should it? how?''' | |||
* do we want to be on the list of critical packages? | |||
** if yes - which packages should be on the list? | |||
** if not - are we going to be treated as second citizens? | |||
* rdieter is releng -> signoff group, so he could be our insider to check critical updates affecting KDEs | |||
* we don't have QA | |||
** SMParrish is triager | |||
** we need QA volunteer | |||
** we have to define QA process | |||
*** we need testing plan | |||
*** basic QA is "try to use the desktop and report any breakage you notice" | |||
*** we need some targets like "does WPA in kde-plasma-nm work?" for a kde-plasma-nm update etc. | |||
** rdieter will prepare concept | |||
'''sharing brand with upstream''' | |||
* jreznik contacted pinheiro (upstream) for his idea | |||
* fedora design team feels more negative on this | |||
* we'd like to try, we need more communication between upstream and our design team | |||
* jreznik to continue as liason between fedora-art team and upsream kde art folks in "sharing branding" | |||
'''Fedora 12 KDE 4.3 feature page''' | |||
* helps the marketing/qa machine | |||
* what we should promote for F12 | |||
** ltinkl is working on Device Kit Solid Backend | |||
** jreznik is working on Policy Kit 1 | |||
* Kevin_Kofler pointed out concerns about Device Kit state | |||
'''Gran Canaria Desktop Summit''' | |||
* jreznik is attending GCDS, if you have something for upstream, contact him | |||
'''Meeting bot''' | |||
* was it useful? ;-) | |||
=== recent bugs === | === recent bugs === | ||
== Comments == | == Comments == | ||
Latest revision as of 08:01, 24 June 2009
Meeting Time
- 2009-06-23 16:00 UTC
- #fedora-meeting on freenode
Participants
Agenda
- topics to discuss:
- RPM Macros for packaging
- critical path packages [1] - does it affect us? should it? how?
- any issues to bring up in the FESCo meeting?
- sharing brand with upstream
- Fedora 12 KDE 4.3 feature page
- recent bugs:
Meeting minutes
Summary
Kevin_Kofler elected to FESCo, any issues to bring up in the FESCo meeting?
- congratulations Kevin!
- next FESCo meeting is on Friday, if you have any issues to bring up in the FESCo meeting, contact Kevin
RPM Macros for packaging
- MathStuf to take it to mailing list for further discussion
- we should have macros for the common directories, any advantage to have macros for all stuff?
- it can help cleanup SPEC files
- do we need all KDE 3 macros?
critical path packages - does it affect us? should it? how?
- do we want to be on the list of critical packages?
- if yes - which packages should be on the list?
- if not - are we going to be treated as second citizens?
- rdieter is releng -> signoff group, so he could be our insider to check critical updates affecting KDEs
- we don't have QA
- SMParrish is triager
- we need QA volunteer
- we have to define QA process
- we need testing plan
- basic QA is "try to use the desktop and report any breakage you notice"
- we need some targets like "does WPA in kde-plasma-nm work?" for a kde-plasma-nm update etc.
- rdieter will prepare concept
sharing brand with upstream
- jreznik contacted pinheiro (upstream) for his idea
- fedora design team feels more negative on this
- we'd like to try, we need more communication between upstream and our design team
- jreznik to continue as liason between fedora-art team and upsream kde art folks in "sharing branding"
Fedora 12 KDE 4.3 feature page
- helps the marketing/qa machine
- what we should promote for F12
- ltinkl is working on Device Kit Solid Backend
- jreznik is working on Policy Kit 1
- Kevin_Kofler pointed out concerns about Device Kit state
Gran Canaria Desktop Summit
- jreznik is attending GCDS, if you have something for upstream, contact him
Meeting bot
- was it useful? ;-)