|
|
(140 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
| |
|
| {{Anchor|Virtualization}} | | {{Anchor|Virtualization}} |
| | |
|
| |
|
| == Virtualization == | | == Virtualization == |
| In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the @et-mgmnt-tools-list, @fedora-xen-list, and @libvirt-list lists. | | In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the |
| | @fedora-virt list. |
|
| |
|
| Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]] | | Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]] |
|
| |
| === Enterprise Management Tools List ===
| |
| This section contains the discussion happening on the
| |
| [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools et-mgmt-tools list]
| |
|
| |
| ==== ====
| |
| <references />
| |
|
| |
|
| === Fedora Virtualization List === | | === Fedora Virtualization List === |
Line 19: |
Line 14: |
| [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list]. | | [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list]. |
|
| |
|
| ==== New Release libguestfs 1.0.41 ==== | | ==== Virt Status Report ==== |
| [[RichardJones|Richard Jones]] | | [[JustinForbes|Justin Forbes]] |
| announced<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-June/msg00020.html</ref>
| | posted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00056.html</ref> a Fedora virtualization status report. |
| "version 1.0.41 of {{package|libguestfs}}, the library for accessing and modifying virtual machine filesystems."
| | Justin pointed out F13 bugs<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_bugs</ref> now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target. |
| | |
| '''New Features:'''
| |
| * squashfs and cramfs support
| |
| * better support for read-only access to drives
| |
| * many problems with string handling in different language bindings have been fixed
| |
| * internationalization support
| |
| * ext4 support improved on RHEL 5
| |
| * improved support for running commands in the guest
| |
| * support for skipping tests
| |
| * lvresize and ext2/3 resize support
| |
| * pvremove, vgremove, lvremove commands
| |
| * sleep command
| |
| * IRC channel #libguestfs on FreeNode
| |
| | |
| See previous release announcement for 1.0.15 in FWN#174 <ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue174#New_Release_libguestfs_1.0.15</ref>.
| |
|
| |
|
| <references /> | | <references /> |
|
| |
|
| | ==== RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity ==== |
| | Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features<ref>http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/</ref> of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 |
| | compared to Fedora 12. |
|
| |
|
| ==== New virt-inspector Features ====
| | [[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]] |
| [[RichardJones|Richard Jones]] | | explained<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00040.html</ref> |
| announced<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-June/msg00049.html</ref>
| | "The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind |
| | | Fedora as you might think. The {{package|libvirt}} mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was |
| "I've added a few extra features to virt-inspector<ref>http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/virt-inspector.1.html</ref> (in | | rebased to be near parity with [[Releases/11|Fedora 11]], and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is |
| {{package|libguestfs}}<ref>http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs/</ref> >= 1.0.42)." | | also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of |
| | | kvm-83 and kvm-84." |
| "First up is a new 'query mode'"
| |
| which prints "out some useful facts about the virtual machine such
| |
| as whether it's fully virtualized or needs a Xen hypervisor, and
| |
| whether it has various paravirt drivers installed."
| |
| | |
| "Secondly (not covered in the manpage), virt-inspector will try to
| |
| discover whether a VM contains the right initrd drivers and module
| |
| configuration to boot under various hypervisors. So for example it
| |
| can tell you whether a guest has the virtio drivers available at boot
| |
| time to boot from a virtio disk."
| |
|
| |
|
| <references /> | | <references /> |
|
| |
|
| ==== Fedora Virtualization Status ====
| |
| [[MarkMcLoughlin|Mark McLoughlin]]
| |
| looked<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-June/msg00030.html</ref> on to Fedora 12 in his latest virtualization status report.
| |
| "Okay, so F-11 is done and dusted. Onwards to F-12!" "Here's what the schedule looks like:"
| |
| : 2009-07-28 Feature Freeze (53 days)
| |
| : 2009-08-04 Beta Freeze (60 days)
| |
| : 2009-09-22 Final Development Freeze (109 days)
| |
| : 2009-10-20 Compose & Stage Release Candidate (137 days)
| |
|
| |
| Highlights of the report included:
| |
| * A thorough run-down of virtualization related bugs.
| |
| * "Dan Berrange was interviewed about virtualization in Fedora 11."<ref>http://jaboutboul.blogspot.com/2009/05/fedora-11-virtualization-reality.html</ref>
| |
| * "Updates are being pushed regularily to the virt-preview repository"<ref>http://markmc.fedorapeople.org/virt-preview/README</ref>
| |
| * "Jeremy Fitzhardinge's latest submission of the Xen Dom0 patches for
| |
| 2.6.31 has caused the kernel community to get themselves into a bit of
| |
| a flap. LWN has a nice article on the 'discussion'"<ref>http://lwn.net/Articles/335812/</ref>
| |
|
| |
| [[GerdHoffmann|Gerd Hoffmann]]
| |
| followed<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-June/msg00034.html</ref>
| |
| up with some details on the controversial bits.
| |
| "lapic + ioapic. That is the big hot topic. Current code lacks
| |
| sensible interfaces to the different apic types out there in the
| |
| wild. The current dom0 patches hook just into that mess instead
| |
| of cleaning it up. Right now it looks like Jeremy has to sort
| |
| that mess to get the xen bits in, using the to-be-created apic
| |
| interfaces."
| |
|
| |
| "No way the apic stuff will make it into the 2.6.31 merge window opening RSN, the work on that barely started. Thus we can expect functional dom0 support upstream in 2.6.32 earliest."
| |
|
| |
| "Also noteworthy: There is a discussion on xen-devel regarding the future of the xen linux trees. Which one should be used & maintained and so on."
| |
| "Looks like Keir seriously considers switching xen-unstable to the pv_ops kernel by default. YES! FINALLY! Well, it is probably to early to uncork the champagne, but I think we can at least put a bottle into the fridge ;)"
| |
|
| |
| <references />
| |
|
| |
| === Fedora Xen List ===
| |
| This section contains the discussion happening on the
| |
| [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen fedora-xen list].
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== ==== | | ==== ==== |
| <references /> | | <references /> |
|
| |
| === Libvirt List ===
| |
| This section contains the discussion happening on the
| |
| [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list libvir-list].
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== ==== | | ==== ==== |
| <references /> | | <references /> |