From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
|||
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Issue == | == Issue == | ||
How much should the ''personas'' work factor into our work to define a target audience for the default Fedora Distribution offering? | |||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
* An effort was started to identify the Fedora's Distribution's target audience using [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personas ''personas''] | |||
* An effort was started to | * Some interviews were conducted, but no one is currently able to dedicate time the effort. | ||
* [[User_Research_Plan| User Research Plan]] | ** [[User_Research_Plan| User Research Plan]] | ||
* Approximately 10 hours of work (possibly more) remains to interview people and collect the data. | |||
* Several more hours after interviews to analyze the data and start developing personas based on it. | |||
== Possible Solutions == | == Possible Solutions == | ||
# Drop the ''personas'' work until someone can carry and lead it | |||
# Seek funding for someone to complete the ''personas'' work | |||
# Seek out volunteers in Fedora to carry the ''personas'' work to its conclusion | |||
# Other solutions? | |||
== Risk/Benefit Analysis == | == Risk/Benefit Analysis == | ||
* Finishing the ''personas'' work would provide a wider body of information for the Board to make an informed decisions on the Fedora distro's target audience. | |||
* Without a clear leader of this effort who has time to commit to it, the likelihood of this effort finishing soon and producing timely information appears to be low. | |||
== Other Thoughts/Considerations == | |||
* Have we been clear enough that the ''Target Audience'' discussion is about the users of the ''Fedora Distribution'' and '''not''' the Fedora Project as a whole? | |||
** Should we explicity state or call out somewhere--in an FAQ? | |||
== Recommendation from 2010-02-08 Meeting == | |||
* Request help from community. If there is no community interest or leadership then close it. | |||
* [[Meeting:Board_strategic_working_group_2010-02-08#Next_Steps_for_Personas]] | |||
* Request sent on 2010-02-12 | |||
** http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2010-February/007964.html | |||
** There was no response | |||
** | |||
[[Category:Strategic working group]] | [[Category:Strategic working group]] |
Latest revision as of 13:44, 31 March 2010
Issue
How much should the personas work factor into our work to define a target audience for the default Fedora Distribution offering?
Background
- An effort was started to identify the Fedora's Distribution's target audience using personas
- Some interviews were conducted, but no one is currently able to dedicate time the effort.
- Approximately 10 hours of work (possibly more) remains to interview people and collect the data.
- Several more hours after interviews to analyze the data and start developing personas based on it.
Possible Solutions
- Drop the personas work until someone can carry and lead it
- Seek funding for someone to complete the personas work
- Seek out volunteers in Fedora to carry the personas work to its conclusion
- Other solutions?
Risk/Benefit Analysis
- Finishing the personas work would provide a wider body of information for the Board to make an informed decisions on the Fedora distro's target audience.
- Without a clear leader of this effort who has time to commit to it, the likelihood of this effort finishing soon and producing timely information appears to be low.
Other Thoughts/Considerations
- Have we been clear enough that the Target Audience discussion is about the users of the Fedora Distribution and not the Fedora Project as a whole?
- Should we explicity state or call out somewhere--in an FAQ?
Recommendation from 2010-02-08 Meeting
- Request help from community. If there is no community interest or leadership then close it.
- Meeting:Board_strategic_working_group_2010-02-08#Next_Steps_for_Personas
- Request sent on 2010-02-12
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2010-February/007964.html
- There was no response