From Fedora Project Wiki

< SIGs‎ | KDE‎ | Meetings
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
== Participants ==
== Participants ==


The list of participants will be filled in after the meeting.
<!--
* [[JaroslavReznik]]
* [[JaroslavReznik]]
* [[KevinKofler]]
* [[KevinKofler]]
Line 15: Line 13:
* [[ThanNgo]]
* [[ThanNgo]]
* [[User:Thomasj|ThomasJanssen]]
* [[User:Thomasj|ThomasJanssen]]
-->


== Agenda ==
== Agenda ==
Line 23: Line 20:
** default install paths for apidocs follow-up
** default install paths for apidocs follow-up
** kmail 2?
** kmail 2?
** meeting with board
* recent bugs:
* recent bugs:
** (none)
** (none)
Line 28: Line 26:
== Transcript ==
== Transcript ==


The transcript will be made available after the meeting.
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-18/kde-sig.2010-05-18-14.04.html Meeting minutes]
<!--
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-18/kde-sig.2010-05-18-14.04.log.html Full log]  
UPDATE ME!
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-04-27/kde-sig.2010-04-27-14.09.html Meeting minutes]
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-04-27/kde-sig.2010-04-27-14.09.log.html Full log]  
-->


== Summary ==
== Summary ==


The summary will be written after the meeting.
'''backport Solid and KNM ModemManager support?'''
* Solid and KNM are getting mobile broadband support [http://lamarque-lvs.blogspot.com/2010/05/solid-and-modemmanager.html] [http://lamarque-lvs.blogspot.com/2010/05/solid-and-modemmanager-update.html]
** but it targets KDE SC 4.6.0
** do we want it earlier? is this priority for us?
* ''ACTION'': Kevin_Kofler to check current state ans possibility of backport for unofficial updates
** in this case we need testers
* ''AGREED'': to wait for now
 
'''default install paths for apidocs follow-up'''
* ''AGREED'': /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/%{name}-apidocs as a default path for apidocs
** what about non KDE apidocs... require kde-filesystem? next meeting...
 
'''kmail 2?'''
* KMail is being ported to Akonadi
** we are afraid - it can broke our KDE PIM solution
** should we skip KDE PIM 4.5?
** what about kde-l10n?


== Comments ==
== Comments ==

Latest revision as of 15:48, 18 May 2010

Meeting Time

Participants

Agenda

  • topics to discuss:
    • backport Solid and KNM ModemManager support?
    • default install paths for apidocs follow-up
    • kmail 2?
    • meeting with board
  • recent bugs:
    • (none)

Transcript

Summary

backport Solid and KNM ModemManager support?

  • Solid and KNM are getting mobile broadband support [1] [2]
    • but it targets KDE SC 4.6.0
    • do we want it earlier? is this priority for us?
  • ACTION: Kevin_Kofler to check current state ans possibility of backport for unofficial updates
    • in this case we need testers
  • AGREED: to wait for now

default install paths for apidocs follow-up

  • AGREED: /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/%{name}-apidocs as a default path for apidocs
    • what about non KDE apidocs... require kde-filesystem? next meeting...

kmail 2?

  • KMail is being ported to Akonadi
    • we are afraid - it can broke our KDE PIM solution
    • should we skip KDE PIM 4.5?
    • what about kde-l10n?

Comments

Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-05-18&oldid=174728"