SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-05-18: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:48, 18 May 2010

topics to discuss:
- backport Solid and KNM ModemManager support?
- default install paths for apidocs follow-up
- kmail 2?
- meeting with board
recent bugs:
- (none)

backport Solid and KNM ModemManager support?

Solid and KNM are getting mobile broadband support [1] [2]
- but it targets KDE SC 4.6.0
- do we want it earlier? is this priority for us?
ACTION: Kevin_Kofler to check current state ans possibility of backport for unofficial updates
- in this case we need testers
AGREED: to wait for now

default install paths for apidocs follow-up

AGREED: /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/%{name}-apidocs as a default path for apidocs
- what about non KDE apidocs... require kde-filesystem? next meeting...

kmail 2?

KMail is being ported to Akonadi
- we are afraid - it can broke our KDE PIM solution
- should we skip KDE PIM 4.5?
- what about kde-l10n?

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 == Summary ==
-The summary will be written after the meeting.
+'''backport Solid and KNM ModemManager support?'''
+* Solid and KNM are getting mobile broadband support [http://lamarque-lvs.blogspot.com/2010/05/solid-and-modemmanager.html] [http://lamarque-lvs.blogspot.com/2010/05/solid-and-modemmanager-update.html]
+** but it targets KDE SC 4.6.0
+** do we want it earlier? is this priority for us?
+* ''ACTION'': Kevin_Kofler to check current state ans possibility of backport for unofficial updates
+** in this case we need testers
+* ''AGREED'': to wait for now
+'''default install paths for apidocs follow-up'''
+* ''AGREED'': /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/%{name}-apidocs as a default path for apidocs
+** what about non KDE apidocs... require kde-filesystem? next meeting...
+'''kmail 2?'''
+* KMail is being ported to Akonadi
+** we are afraid - it can broke our KDE PIM solution
+** should we skip KDE PIM 4.5?
+** what about kde-l10n?
 == Comments ==