From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Could we have a paragraph documenting how this might impact KVM and Xen guests in typical configurations? Even if the answer is "it's no problem"? | Could we have a paragraph documenting how this might impact KVM and Xen guests in typical configurations? Even if the answer is "it's no problem"? | ||
--[[User:Mattdm|Mattdm]] ([[User talk:Mattdm|talk]]) 19:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC) | --[[User:Mattdm|Mattdm]] ([[User talk:Mattdm|talk]]) 19:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
* will do [[User:Harald|Harald]] ([[User talk:Harald|talk]]) 08:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Also, how big is that rescue image going to be, and will it be optional? --[[User:Mattdm|Mattdm]] ([[User talk:Mattdm|talk]]) 19:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC) | Also, how big is that rescue image going to be, and will it be optional? --[[User:Mattdm|Mattdm]] ([[User talk:Mattdm|talk]]) 19:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
* There are now dracut-nohostonly and dracut-norescue subpackages, which can be included in an installation set. [[User:Harald|Harald]] ([[User talk:Harald|talk]]) 08:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Is there a contingency plan for severe security issues or bugs in the rescue-mode kernel or in the rescue tools? Theoretically that won't be used in a situation where the system is accessible for attack in rescue mode, but it might be good to have a plan for updating it if need be. --[[User:Mattdm|Mattdm]] ([[User talk:Mattdm|talk]]) 19:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
* Not yet, but don't have that strategy either for the old kernel entries, which we keep [[User:Harald|Harald]] ([[User talk:Harald|talk]]) 08:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:59, 13 March 2013
Could we have a paragraph documenting how this might impact KVM and Xen guests in typical configurations? Even if the answer is "it's no problem"? --Mattdm (talk) 19:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Also, how big is that rescue image going to be, and will it be optional? --Mattdm (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- There are now dracut-nohostonly and dracut-norescue subpackages, which can be included in an installation set. Harald (talk) 08:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Is there a contingency plan for severe security issues or bugs in the rescue-mode kernel or in the rescue tools? Theoretically that won't be used in a situation where the system is accessible for attack in rescue mode, but it might be good to have a plan for updating it if need be. --Mattdm (talk) 19:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC)