From Fedora Project Wiki
(update page with the results of the meeting) |
m (wiki fix) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* [[Test_Day:2013-05-07_ABRT]] went ahead successfully, though with little testing from outside of Brno | * [[Test_Day:2013-05-07_ABRT]] went ahead successfully, though with little testing from outside of Brno | ||
* [[Test_Day:2013-05-09_SSSD_Improvements_and_AD_Integration]] went ahead and looks to have got a good set of test results | * [[Test_Day:2013-05-09_SSSD_Improvements_and_AD_Integration]] went ahead and looks to have got a good set of test results | ||
* NetworkManager Test Day was [[ | * NetworkManager Test Day was [[Test_Day:2013-06-04_Network_Manager|postponed to 2013-06-04]] | ||
== Open floor == | == Open floor == |
Latest revision as of 05:49, 14 May 2013
Attendees
Agenda
- Previous meeting follow-up
- Fedora 19 Beta status/planning
- Test Days
- Open floor
Previous meeting follow-up
- martix or adamw to write a Graphics Test Week recap email - still not done yet, unfortunately
- tflink to write a list post announcing the blocker bug proposal webapp - not done yet
- brunowolff to update the FE guidelines to reflect the agreement (see above) - this was done
- adamw to look into Test_Day:2013-04-30_MariaDB lack of participation and see if we should re-run it - not done yet
- kparal to ensure abrt and sssd test days have live images ready - this was done, images were available for both events
- adamw to do some promotion for the test days - blog post and forum post and twitter done
Fedora 19 Beta status/planning
- Beta TC4 was already under testing, some significant bugs found
- Beta freeze was scheduled for 2013-05-14; next goal was to build an RC ASAP
Test Days
- Test_Day:2013-05-07_ABRT went ahead successfully, though with little testing from outside of Brno
- Test_Day:2013-05-09_SSSD_Improvements_and_AD_Integration went ahead and looks to have got a good set of test results
- NetworkManager Test Day was postponed to 2013-06-04
Open floor
- GNOME 3.8.2 update was expected to land soon, and needed karma so we could try to get it in ahead of Beta freeze
- Desktop team was still working on getting the spin below the size target
- LXDE will continue to target 700 MB, cwickert to work on slimming it down
- nirik was working on Xfce spin size
Action items
- martix or adamw to write a Graphics Test Week recap email
- tflink to write a list post announcing the blocker bug proposal webapp
- adamw to look into Test_Day:2013-04-30_MariaDB lack of participation and see if we should re-run it
- brunowolff to re-test bug #909473 and re-open if it's still bad
IRC Log
adamw | #startmeeting Fedora QA meeting | 15:02 |
---|---|---|
zodbot | Meeting started Mon May 13 15:02:11 2013 UTC. The chair is adamw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:02 |
zodbot | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. | 15:02 |
adamw | #meetingname fedora-qa | 15:02 |
zodbot | The meeting name has been set to 'fedora-qa' | 15:02 |
adamw | #topic roll call | 15:02 |
* jskladan lurks | 15:02 | |
adamw | calling all rolls | 15:02 |
tflink | roll! | 15:02 |
* mkrizek is here | 15:02 | |
* pschindl is here | 15:02 | |
* brunowolff is here | 15:02 | |
* Viking-Ice is here | 15:03 | |
jreiser | jreiser lurks | 15:03 |
* satellit listening | 15:03 | |
adamw | morning folks | 15:04 |
adamw | #topic previous meeting follow-up | 15:04 |
adamw | bit of a bumper crop here | 15:04 |
adamw | #info "martix or adamw to write a Graphics Test Week recap email" - still not done yet. we suck | 15:04 |
adamw | #action martix or adamw to write a Graphics Test Week recap email | 15:04 |
adamw | tflink to write a list post announcing the blocker bug proposal webapp - I believe you did that? | 15:05 |
tflink | I don't think I did | 15:05 |
tflink | nope, I don't see one | 15:06 |
adamw | ah, well you suck too | 15:06 |
adamw | #action tflink to write a list post announcing the blocker bug proposal webapp | 15:06 |
adamw | "brunowolff to update the FE guidelines to reflect the agreement (see above)" | 15:06 |
brunowolff | #link http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-May/115318.html | 15:06 |
adamw | great job of legibility there, me | 15:06 |
adamw | #info "brunowolff to update the FE guidelines to reflect the agreement (see above)" - this was done, see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-May/115318.html | 15:07 |
adamw | thanks bruno! | 15:07 |
brunowolff | I didn't get any feedback from the message posted to the test list. | 15:07 |
adamw | "adamw to look into Test_Day:2013-04-30_MariaDB lack of participation and see if we should re-run it" | 15:07 |
adamw | brunowolff: it looked fine to me, so no action needed...i guess everyone else was the same | 15:07 |
adamw | yeah, I didn't do this one either, good lord, I need to read my action items | 15:07 |
adamw | #info "adamw to look into Test_Day:2013-04-30_MariaDB lack of participation and see if we should re-run it" - not done yet | 15:08 |
adamw | #action adamw to look into Test_Day:2013-04-30_MariaDB lack of participation and see if we should re-run it | 15:08 |
adamw | #info "tflink to write a list post announcing the blocker bug proposal webapp" - not done yet | 15:08 |
adamw | "kparal to ensure abrt and sssd test days have live images ready" - do we have a kparal? | 15:08 |
Viking-Ice | adamw, it's simple no point in re-running it | 15:08 |
adamw | no kparal, okay | 15:10 |
adamw | let me take a look | 15:10 |
adamw | #info "kparal to ensure abrt and sssd test days have live images ready" - this got done, by the looks of things, both pages have live images listed | 15:11 |
adamw | #info "adamw to do some promotion for the test days" - this was done, i got blog posts and twitter messages out: http://www.happyassassin.net/2013/05/06/abrt-and-sssd-test-days-this-week/ | 15:11 |
adamw | #topic Fedora 19 Beta status/planning | 15:11 |
adamw | So, any particular notes on Beta, anyone? we'll be hitting freeze soon | 15:12 |
adamw | #info Beta TC4 is currently under testing, some significant bugs found already | 15:12 |
Viking-Ice | adamw, promotion means handing it out to marketing not private blog post that nobody reads | 15:12 |
jreiser | gdm greeter to gnome shell does not work on non-3D cards. Bug 955779 graphical desktop does not start. | 15:12 |
Viking-Ice | ( or some or few people read ) marketing should just handle that stuff for us | 15:13 |
brunowolff | cwickert asked about images for the non-desktop spins on the spins list. I said that for alpha/beta nightlies should be used. | 15:13 |
jreiser | There is a rumor of gnome 3.8.2 arriving on Tuesday, perhaps fedora-branched on wednesday. Wait and see? | 15:15 |
adamw | jreiser: did you create passwords for your test users? | 15:16 |
adamw | jreiser: well, not a rumour, we're trying to get it done ahead of the freeze indeed | 15:16 |
jreiser | yes, I have passwords. This is an alpha that has been updated daily. | 15:17 |
adamw | i'm pretty sure that "ERROR:gdm-slave.c:1094:_get_uid_and_gid_for_user: assertion failed: (username != NULL)" is what I saw when I tried creating a user with no password via g-i-s (it was entertaining) | 15:17 |
adamw | hum, then probably something different | 15:17 |
adamw | can you try and reproduce with a clean install? or not practical? | 15:17 |
jreiser | OK, I'll do a clean install from TC4. | 15:17 |
adamw | has anyone else seen this one? | 15:18 |
brunowolff | Bug 955779 sounds pretty similar to what I was seeing after gdm/gnome-shell got fixed enough that they didn't crash while using llvmpipe on non-SSE2 CPUs. | 15:19 |
robatino | 955779 looks like my 946964 | 15:20 |
adamw | brunowolff: ah yeah, what was the bug# for that? | 15:20 |
robatino | thanks for that, i'll probably mark mine as a dupe - my video is nvidia btw | 15:20 |
jreiser | No crash, but no transition to desktop. just all gray, everybody waiting. | 15:20 |
brunowolff | I am not sure. I was just looking, but I think it got closed since the crashing part was fixed, even if things were still pretty unusable. | 15:21 |
brunowolff | I'll look harder. | 15:21 |
adamw | brunowolff: i remember the bug yeah, i'm just blanking on the # / title | 15:21 |
jreiser | strace shows 1st "can you do 3D" gets a no, but 2nd ask gets a Yes. | 15:21 |
adamw | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=909473 | 15:21 |
adamw | jreiser: see my latest comment | 15:21 |
adamw | brunowolff: doesn't really look the same, but certainly possibly related | 15:22 |
brunowolff | Yeah, 909473. I think the reported problem was different, but the state after the fix seemed a bit similar. | 15:23 |
jreiser | adamw: 909473 last comment is a question "open new X bug or not?" If that will help, I'll do it. | 15:23 |
adamw | jreiser: well to me it doesn't, really, but I might be reading it wrong... | 15:24 |
adamw | jreiser: I think we'd best wait for gdm input at this point | 15:24 |
brunowolff | I also was using an ATI 9200 for some of the testing. | 15:24 |
brunowolff | I haven't look at it much since, because it takes a lot of messing around to test, since my old slow to boot machines have been switched over to kdm/xfce. | 15:25 |
jreiser | Ok, I'll try clean TC4, then wait for gdm 3.8.2 | 15:25 |
jreiser | I see same trouble on xfce, too. | 15:26 |
adamw | jreiser: i _think_ your issue may simply be a clean report of what happens with a blacklisted 3D adapter at present | 15:26 |
adamw | now I come to think of it, I'm not sure we have any other bug report for that case | 15:26 |
adamw | jreiser: have you tested GDM/GNOME with the laundry list of cards in c#13? | 15:26 |
adamw | i'd guess it'd work better with those? | 15:26 |
jreiser | 955779#c13 gives exact status on all cards as of April 23. "3D" cards pass, "X does not support 3D" cards fail. | 15:28 |
halfline | jreiser: re 955779 do you have gnome-initial-setup installed ? | 15:30 |
adamw | jreiser: Xfce and lightdm behave completely differently from GNOME and gdm in this regards, so that comment is more confusing than enlightening | 15:30 |
adamw | it's strange that they seem to respond 'the same' for you, but the actual code paths are pretty different | 15:31 |
adamw | lightdm doesn't have any form of '3D test' because it doesn't need to care | 15:31 |
jreiser | Please restate what you want me to try. | 15:31 |
adamw | (afaik anyway) | 15:31 |
adamw | jreiser: try the combination of GDM/GNOME on all those cards, rather than lightdm/Xfce | 15:31 |
halfline | i'd personally like you to try yum -y install gnome-initial-setup | 15:31 |
adamw | only because I know the maintainer would want the same; they do not behave the same at all | 15:31 |
jreiser | So far I have installed default gnome first, then "yum groupinstall xfce-desktop". | 15:32 |
jreiser | I get gdm as greeter. Both gnome desktop and xfce session fail to reach desktop. | 15:32 |
halfline | ahh interesting | 15:32 |
jreiser | That's why I believe the problem is in gdm. | 15:32 |
adamw | jreiser: comment #13 talks about trying the Xfce live image. what I'm saying is that that tells us nothing about gdm's behaviour | 15:33 |
adamw | i just wanted to know how your different adapters/machines behaved with GDM. | 15:33 |
adamw | clearly you have a problem with GDM on the 9200, but I wanted to clarify if you saw it with any other adapters. | 15:34 |
jreiser | I believe that "X11 supports 3D" implies that gdm+gnome works, and gdm+xfce works. | 15:34 |
jreiser | The problem is "x11 does not support 3d" implies failure of gdm greeter. | 15:35 |
adamw | anyhow | 15:35 |
adamw | i think we have Top Men on the case now | 15:36 |
halfline | jreiser: gnome-session does this little dance at startup | 15:36 |
halfline | where it first runs check-accelerated and sees if it succeeds | 15:36 |
halfline | if it fails, it forces software rendering | 15:36 |
halfline | and then runs check-accelerated again | 15:36 |
halfline | the second run should always succeed | 15:36 |
halfline | that's why you see it twice in your trace | 15:36 |
halfline | it's not able to do accelerated rendering the first time around | 15:36 |
halfline | so it's falling back to software | 15:37 |
adamw | #info Beta freeze is tomorrow, 2013-05-14; next goal is to build an RC ASAP | 15:37 |
halfline | let's chat in #fedora-devel | 15:37 |
jreiser | halfline: yes, that is what I see. This is Pentium4, has sse2. problem is no desktop after that dance. | 15:37 |
adamw | thanks halfline! | 15:38 |
jreiser | halfline: going to #fedora-devel | 15:38 |
adamw | brunowolff: so the behaviour on non-SSE2 CPUs is still as bad as described in 909473 > | 15:38 |
adamw | ? | 15:38 |
brunowolff | I need to retest. | 15:39 |
brunowolff | But the last time I tried, gnome wasn't really usable. | 15:40 |
adamw | ok, could you do that? and if it's still bad let's just re-open the bug to try and trigger ajax's attention | 15:40 |
adamw | #action brunowolff to re-test 909473 and re-open if it's still bad | 15:40 |
adamw | okay...anything else to cover on the f19 front? | 15:41 |
adamw | #info GNOME 3.8.2 is coming, we will try to land it in Beta just ahead of the freeze' | 15:41 |
brunowolff | Even if it gets fixed, my CPUs aren't really good enough to make gnome pleasant. I'll probably be using xfce for the rest of the lifetime of these machines. | 15:41 |
adamw | still, it'd be good to have it fixed | 15:41 |
* satellit will this break cinnamon? | 15:41 | |
adamw | satellit: will what? | 15:41 |
adamw | GNOME 3.8.2? I'd hope not; it's a bugfix release | 15:41 |
satellit | gnome upgrade | 15:42 |
satellit | fyi cinnamon works at this time | 15:42 |
adamw | yeah, I know, I tested it | 15:42 |
brunowolff | Isn't it landing the day of the freeze? | 15:42 |
Viking-Ice | let's hope it get's included in beta | 15:43 |
brunowolff | That's not much time to get it tested and into stable. | 15:43 |
adamw | brunowolff: yeah, I know, I'm going to try and co-ordinate getting karma on it | 15:44 |
adamw | if we don't make it, though, we'll file an FE bug | 15:45 |
adamw | #topic Test Days | 15:45 |
adamw | #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-05-07_ABRT went ahead and we got some good results, though not much testing outside of RH's Brno office | 15:46 |
adamw | #info https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-05-09_SSSD_Improvements_and_AD_Integration went ahead and looks like there was a good amount of testing | 15:46 |
adamw | #info NetworkManager test day has been postponed to 2013-06-04: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-06-04_Network_Manager | 15:47 |
adamw | anything else on test days? | 15:47 |
adamw | Martix_: is everything in hand for next week's? | 15:48 |
Martix_ | no :-( | 15:48 |
adamw | oh dear :( what's the problem? | 15:48 |
Martix_ | note: NM test day has been moved to 2013-06-04 | 15:49 |
adamw | yeah, I noted that | 15:49 |
adamw | hence "next week's" | 15:49 |
adamw | AnacondaNewUI Followup and Thermostat are scheduled for next week | 15:50 |
Martix_ | I must admit I don't have much time until June for Test Days :-/ | 15:50 |
adamw | ah | 15:50 |
adamw | in that case, any help with wrangling the remaining May test days is appreciated, I'll try and help out | 15:50 |
Martix_ | adamw: thank you | 15:50 |
Martix_ | adamw: btw I suggested to reschedule MariaDB TD, but I'm not sure if they can get more testers | 15:52 |
adamw | #topic Open floor | 15:52 |
adamw | we've got 8 minutes for open floor before exciting blocker review fun starts up in #fedora-blocker-review: anything to discuss? | 15:52 |
kalev | I have collected a few fixes that should help get the desktop live media closer to the target size | 15:53 |
* satellit wait for blocker review for FE requst | 15:53 | |
Viking-Ice | so what we are going to include the gnome 3.8.2 in beta or not? | 15:53 |
kalev | I'll send an email to the test list a bit later, would be awesome to get some testing & karma to have them included in the Beta release | 15:53 |
kalev | (waiting for one more build) | 15:53 |
adamw | Viking-Ice: i'm hoping we can. if we can get it done ahead of tomorrow, fine. if not, i'll file an FE ticket and people will have to vote on it | 15:54 |
adamw | Viking-Ice: if you and I each submit karma once the update is in, then we only need one other person :) | 15:54 |
adamw | (assuming it actually works, of course) | 15:55 |
adamw | #info GNOME 3.8.2 update should be landing soon, please test and file karma so we can try to get it in ahead of freeze | 15:55 |
kalev | we'll need some releng coordination to get an updates-testing push once the update is ready | 15:55 |
adamw | kalev: i'll ask releng to do that, but people can get it from bodhi in the mean time | 15:55 |
kalev | hard to test otherwise | 15:55 |
Viking-Ice | adamw, yeah well doing so we risk breaking and delaying beta | 15:55 |
kalev | cool | 15:55 |
Viking-Ice | not doing so we risk mass duplicated bug report from users | 15:56 |
adamw | Viking-Ice: i think it'd be ok to get it in the first day or two of freeze, after that it'd be worrying | 15:56 |
adamw | but if we co-ordinate we should be able to get it done today/tomorrow, so hopefully no problems | 15:56 |
adamw | #info desktop team is still working on getting the spin below the size target | 15:57 |
Viking-Ice | what about the rest of the spins? | 15:58 |
Viking-Ice | did you hear something from cwickert regarding lxde size ( FE ) | 15:58 |
adamw | oh, good point. no, I haven't, has anyone else? | 15:59 |
adamw | notting thinks the DVD might squeeze under size on the next compose, so we're keeping an eye open for that | 15:59 |
adamw | #info no word on LXDE spin being over size, we believe the DVD may make it under size on the next spin | 16:00 |
* nirik has been working on Xfce. we are down to deciding about browsers. | 16:00 | |
adamw | #info nirik is working on Xfce spin size | 16:00 |
nirik | I'll do something today with it, so we should be back under size tomorrow. | 16:01 |
adamw | blocker review starting up right now over in #fedora-blocker-review, folks | 16:01 |
adamw | so let's set the Patent Fuse | 16:01 |
cwickert | ??! | 16:01 |
* cwickert never heard of it | 16:01 | |
cwickert | is it oversized? | 16:01 |
adamw | cwickert: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958427 | 16:01 |
adamw | oh, damn, i missed that it's assigned to bill :/ | 16:01 |
adamw | do you want to re-assign to yourself? | 16:02 |
adamw | robatino: in future it'd be good to CC the maintainer of the spin on 'spin oversize' tickets | 16:02 |
adamw | or assign it directly to them | 16:02 |
nirik | perhaps those should be against livecd-spinname? | 16:02 |
cwickert | I will take care of this | 16:02 |
adamw | yeah, probably | 16:02 |
adamw | thanks cwickert | 16:02 |
adamw | good thing we caught it ;) | 16:02 |
cwickert | however I want to say it sucks we are getting fatter and fatter with every releasee | 16:03 |
cwickert | at some point we should consider removing esoteric input methods and fonts nobody needs | 16:03 |
cwickert | anyway, too late for f19 | 16:03 |
nirik | yeah, I have no idea which of the i18n stuff is important. | 16:03 |
nirik | :( | 16:03 |
cwickert | none? :-P | 16:04 |
nirik | well, I mean some of the dictionaries or fonts... are they required to make things work? or just an extra? | 16:04 |
cwickert | #info LXDE will continue to target 700 MB, cwickert to work on slimming it down | 16:04 |
robatino | i reassigned to LiveCD-LXDE | 16:05 |
cwickert | thanks | 16:05 |
cwickert | move on please | 16:05 |
cwickert | and thanks for the heads-up, adamw | 16:05 |
adamw | nirik: do ask the i18n folks. it sucks when people rip stuff out unnecessarily | 16:05 |
adamw | cwickert: thank viking | 16:05 |
cwickert | thanks Viking-Ice! | 16:06 |
adamw | alrighty folks, everyone over to blocker review, thanks for coming! | 16:06 |
adamw | #endmeeting | 16:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.11.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!