No edit summary |
|||
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
We're thinking about considering these ontologies for these things | We're thinking about considering these ontologies for these things | ||
* doap, information about projects | * doap, information about projects, https://github.com/edumbill/doap/wiki | ||
* foaf, information about people | * foaf, information about people, http://www.foaf-project.org/ | ||
* | * opengraph, http://ogp.me | ||
* admssw, information about software, http://purl.org/adms/sw/ | * admssw, information about software, http://purl.org/adms/sw/ [https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/svn/adms_foss/adms_sw_v1.00/adms_sw_v1.00.htm HTML description of the ontology] | ||
* annotationType, http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType | * annotationType, http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType | ||
* annotations, http://rdf.myexperiment.org/ontologies/annotations/ | |||
Take a look at what is done with rdf at packages.qa.debian.org. | Take a look at what is done with rdf at packages.qa.debian.org. | ||
Also, Gnome is using DOAP in their package repositories - https://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-list/2009-April/msg00007.html | |||
== application status == | == application status == | ||
Line 39: | Line 42: | ||
| packages || https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ || doap, foaf, admssw || | | packages || https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ || doap, foaf, admssw || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| badges || https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ || foaf || | | badges || https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ || foaf || *done* - needs to be evaluated for completeness/correctness. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bodhi || https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates || doap, admssw || | | bodhi || https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates || doap, admssw || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| wiki || https://fedoraproject.org/wiki || semantic media wiki plugin? || | | wiki || https://fedoraproject.org/wiki || semantic media wiki plugin? || | ||
Line 54: | Line 55: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| frontpage || https://fedoraproject.org/ || doap || Because Fedora Project is a "Project" | | frontpage || https://fedoraproject.org/ || doap || Because Fedora Project is a "Project" | ||
|- | |||
| tagger || https://apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger || annotations || | |||
|} | |} | ||
=== Started === | |||
{|class="wikitable sortable" | |||
! Name !! URL !! Ontologies !! Status | |||
|- | |||
| cnucnu web || http://209.132.184.188/cnucnu/project/subsurface/ || doap || The project pages are done | |||
|- | |||
| pkgdb2 || http://209.132.184.188/package/aalib/ || doap, foaf, admssw || The package page has doap meta-tags | |||
|} | |||
=== Ignore these === | === Ignore these === |
Latest revision as of 13:11, 10 December 2013
Web Ontology for Fedora Applications
Notes for persons who met at Flock 2013 to discuss enabling our web applications for the semantic web.
interested persons
ontologies
We're thinking about considering these ontologies for these things
- doap, information about projects, https://github.com/edumbill/doap/wiki
- foaf, information about people, http://www.foaf-project.org/
- opengraph, http://ogp.me
- admssw, information about software, http://purl.org/adms/sw/ HTML description of the ontology
- annotationType, http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType
- annotations, http://rdf.myexperiment.org/ontologies/annotations/
Take a look at what is done with rdf at packages.qa.debian.org.
Also, Gnome is using DOAP in their package repositories - https://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-list/2009-April/msg00007.html
application status
This is a list of all of our applications. We should consider each one and move it to a "we're not going to consider this one" list if it doesn't make sense. For the ones that do make sense we should make notes about what ontologies apply, and what is our current status for enabling them.
To be considered
Name | URL | Ontologies | Status |
---|---|---|---|
packages | https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ | doap, foaf, admssw | |
badges | https://badges.fedoraproject.org/ | foaf | *done* - needs to be evaluated for completeness/correctness. |
bodhi | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates | doap, admssw | |
wiki | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki | semantic media wiki plugin? | |
pkgs | https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/ | doap, admssw? | |
fas | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts | foaf? | This will require FAS3 |
askbot | https://ask.fedoraproject.org/questions/ | annotationType | |
frontpage | https://fedoraproject.org/ | doap | Because Fedora Project is a "Project" |
tagger | https://apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger | annotations |
Started
Name | URL | Ontologies | Status |
---|---|---|---|
cnucnu web | http://209.132.184.188/cnucnu/project/subsurface/ | doap | The project pages are done |
pkgdb2 | http://209.132.184.188/package/aalib/ | doap, foaf, admssw | The package page has doap meta-tags |
Ignore these
Our first look through determined that they were either too hard or didn't make sense.
Name | URL | Status |
---|---|---|
lists | http://lists.fedoraproject.org/ | It kind of makes sense to do this, but not at the moment. Not without mailman3/hyperkitty. |
paste | https://paste.fedoraproject.org/ | |
docs | https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/index.html | |
busmon | https://apps.fedoraproject.org/busmon/ | |
rhbz | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ | |
status | http://status.fedoraproject.org/ | |
people | https://fedorapeople.org | |
planet | http://planet.fedoraproject.org/ | |
retrace | https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/summary/ | |
blockerbugs | http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs | |
collectd | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/collectd | |
easyfix | https://fedoraproject.org/easyfix | |
elections | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting | |
haproxy | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/haproxy/proxy1 | |
koji | https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji | |
nagios | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/nagios | |
mirrors | https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/ |