Jwcampbell (talk | contribs) (added info about f16 eol) |
Gsreekantan (talk | contribs) (→About Post upgrade: replace yum with dnf?) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Older Version References == | |||
Do we need to reference upgrades from Fedora 16? Fedora 16 reached EOL in February of 2013. | Do we need to reference upgrades from Fedora 16? Fedora 16 reached EOL in February of 2013. | ||
== User Experiences == | |||
There should be a place for user experiences to help the next person during their install woes. - [[User:Kitchm|Kitchm]] ([[User talk:Kitchm|talk]]) 19:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
=== About Post upgrade === | |||
I think the issue with chrome and the upgrade is obsolete, could it be that it was inserted for the upgrade to fedora 19 (or 18 even)? | |||
I did not have an issue with chrome after the upgrade to fedora 20. | |||
--[[User:Jringoot|Jringoot]] ([[User talk:Jringoot|talk]]) 08:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
I didn't have any problem with the Chrome Beta on the upgrade to Fedora 21 Beta. | |||
--[[User:Rocketraman|Rocketraman]] ([[User talk:Rocketraman|talk]]) 02:00, 29 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
Proposed addition after --rebuilddb recommendation: | |||
Due to [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167946 bug #1167946] rebuilddb causes the selinux context of the files in /var/lib/rpm to be lost. Fix this via: | |||
{{command|restorecon -rv /var/lib/rpm/}} | |||
--[[User:Rocketraman|Rocketraman]] ([[User talk:Rocketraman|talk]]) 02:00, 29 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Fedora 22 replaces yum with dnf as default. In fact, running yum throws a warning to use dnf instead. So it might be a good idea to replace the Post upgrade steps with equivalent dnf commands. | |||
--[[User:Gsreekantan|Gsreekantan]] ([[User talk:Gsreekantan|talk]]) 10:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
== what do log errors look like? == | |||
Please give us a grep command we can use to quickly check if there are any errors in the log file. It's a waste of time to scroll down am 8,000-line file, not knowing exactly what an error line will look like. | |||
<br> | |||
[[User:Daveyost|Daveyost]] ([[User talk:Daveyost|talk]]) 07:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:41, 27 April 2015
Older Version References
Do we need to reference upgrades from Fedora 16? Fedora 16 reached EOL in February of 2013.
User Experiences
There should be a place for user experiences to help the next person during their install woes. - Kitchm (talk) 19:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
About Post upgrade
I think the issue with chrome and the upgrade is obsolete, could it be that it was inserted for the upgrade to fedora 19 (or 18 even)? I did not have an issue with chrome after the upgrade to fedora 20. --Jringoot (talk) 08:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
I didn't have any problem with the Chrome Beta on the upgrade to Fedora 21 Beta. --Rocketraman (talk) 02:00, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Proposed addition after --rebuilddb recommendation:
Due to bug #1167946 rebuilddb causes the selinux context of the files in /var/lib/rpm to be lost. Fix this via:
restorecon -rv /var/lib/rpm/
--Rocketraman (talk) 02:00, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Fedora 22 replaces yum with dnf as default. In fact, running yum throws a warning to use dnf instead. So it might be a good idea to replace the Post upgrade steps with equivalent dnf commands.
--Gsreekantan (talk) 10:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
what do log errors look like?
Please give us a grep command we can use to quickly check if there are any errors in the log file. It's a waste of time to scroll down am 8,000-line file, not knowing exactly what an error line will look like.
Daveyost (talk) 07:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)