From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
= Incomplete Items For Feature Acceptance= | = Incomplete Items For Feature Acceptance= | ||
Please update the following items and change the category of this page to CategoryProposedFedora10 once they are completed. The feature | Please update the following items and change the category of this page to CategoryProposedFedora10 once they are completed. The feature wranglers have a watch on this page and will see your changes. | ||
# Last updated | # Last updated | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
## Release Notes | ## Release Notes | ||
# Is it possible to add more detail to the test plan to make it more robust? | # Is it possible to add more detail to the test plan to make it more robust? | ||
''Harald'': | |||
# Last updated '''done''' | |||
# All sections of the form need to be completed including | |||
## Dependencies '''done''' | |||
## Documentation '''tbd''' | |||
## Release Notes '''done''' | |||
# Is it possible to add more detail to the test plan to make it more robust? | |||
"robust" ? | |||
Latest revision as of 12:54, 7 August 2008
Comments and Discussion
- User:Stardust: Do you consider changing the order of services, thus the GDM login window starts before other services? It would be a great speed-up for all desktop users (server users don't run runlevel 5 by default so much I think..)
Incomplete Items For Feature Acceptance
Please update the following items and change the category of this page to CategoryProposedFedora10 once they are completed. The feature wranglers have a watch on this page and will see your changes.
- Last updated
- All sections of the form need to be completed including
- Dependencies
- Documentation
- Release Notes
- Is it possible to add more detail to the test plan to make it more robust?
Harald:
- Last updated done
- All sections of the form need to be completed including
- Dependencies done
- Documentation tbd
- Release Notes done
- Is it possible to add more detail to the test plan to make it more robust?
"robust" ?