From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
m (internal link cleaning) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[ | [[RahulSundaram|Rahul Sundaram]] posted a [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-india/2009-December/msg00023.html mail] to the [https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-india fedora-india list] aimed at gathering a feedback about the FOSS.IN 2009 presence of Fedora. The table below attempts to list out the salient points of the responses and, put some action items wherever possible. | ||
{| | {| | ||
! Name | ! Name | ||
! Feedback | ! Feedback | ||
! Action Item | ! Action Item | ||
! Owner | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Rahul Sundaram | | Rahul Sundaram | ||
| meeting people works,more focus on presence and swag, list of easy tasks are important, current team is well-rounded but needs smaller task list for easy coaching, knowing and using Bugzilla keywords are important | | meeting people works,more focus on presence and swag, list of easy tasks are important, current team is well-rounded but needs smaller task list for easy coaching, knowing and using Bugzilla keywords are important | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Susmit Shannigrahi | | Susmit Shannigrahi | ||
| concern over absence of new faces, meeting people works, swag focus | | concern over absence of new faces, meeting people works, swag focus | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Aanjhan R | | Aanjhan R | ||
| assess return on time/effort invested, investigate low PoTD attendance, how did current contributors begin, choose easier "upstreams" with local developers, expedite reviews for "First Time Packagers" | | assess return on time/effort invested, investigate low PoTD attendance, how did current contributors begin, choose easier "upstreams" with local developers, expedite reviews for "First Time Packagers" | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Shakthi Kannan | | Shakthi Kannan | ||
| creating awareness is important | | creating awareness is important | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Kedar Sovani | | Kedar Sovani | ||
| workouts with specific small,easy tasks and goals are nice to have | | workouts with specific small,easy tasks and goals are nice to have | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Steven Fernandez | | Steven Fernandez | ||
| delay in package review/packaging help is a turn-off | | delay in package review/packaging help is a turn-off | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 33: | Line 40: | ||
| Packaging SIG discussed queue priority long time ago, no further action taken | | Packaging SIG discussed queue priority long time ago, no further action taken | ||
| Two things which can be done are 1) Call up sig meet and discuss 2) Make up a team of reviewer (non sponsors also) who can keep on doing unoffical reviews and help in process for new contributors. | | Two things which can be done are 1) Call up sig meet and discuss 2) Make up a team of reviewer (non sponsors also) who can keep on doing unoffical reviews and help in process for new contributors. | ||
| | |||
|} | |} | ||
'''Please try and identify Action Items that are relevant with your feedback and, if possible take ownership.''' | '''Please try and identify Action Items that are relevant with your feedback and, if possible take ownership.''' | ||
Latest revision as of 23:17, 17 September 2016
Rahul Sundaram posted a mail to the fedora-india list aimed at gathering a feedback about the FOSS.IN 2009 presence of Fedora. The table below attempts to list out the salient points of the responses and, put some action items wherever possible.
| Name | Feedback | Action Item | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rahul Sundaram | meeting people works,more focus on presence and swag, list of easy tasks are important, current team is well-rounded but needs smaller task list for easy coaching, knowing and using Bugzilla keywords are important | ||
| Susmit Shannigrahi | concern over absence of new faces, meeting people works, swag focus | ||
| Aanjhan R | assess return on time/effort invested, investigate low PoTD attendance, how did current contributors begin, choose easier "upstreams" with local developers, expedite reviews for "First Time Packagers" | ||
| Shakthi Kannan | creating awareness is important | ||
| Kedar Sovani | workouts with specific small,easy tasks and goals are nice to have | ||
| Steven Fernandez | delay in package review/packaging help is a turn-off | ||
| Rakesh Pandit | Packaging SIG discussed queue priority long time ago, no further action taken | Two things which can be done are 1) Call up sig meet and discuss 2) Make up a team of reviewer (non sponsors also) who can keep on doing unoffical reviews and help in process for new contributors. |
Please try and identify Action Items that are relevant with your feedback and, if possible take ownership.