No edit summary |
m (internal link cleaning) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
FESCo approved the alternatives guidelines by a 9-0 vote. | FESCo approved the alternatives guidelines by a 9-0 vote. | ||
== Feature: liblvm - | == Feature: liblvm - [[Features/liblvm]] == | ||
FESCo added some questions to the Talk section, and tabled discussion until the feature owner could respond. | FESCo added some questions to the Talk section, and tabled discussion until the feature owner could respond. | ||
== Feature: Dracut - | == Feature: Dracut - [[Features/Dracut]] == | ||
FESCo approved dracut by a 7-0 vote, and voiced that it should receive a lot of testing. | FESCo approved dracut by a 7-0 vote, and voiced that it should receive a lot of testing. | ||
Latest revision as of 08:04, 18 September 2016
Members Present
* Jon Stanley (jds2001) * Kevin Fenzi (nirik) * Dan Horak (sharkcz) * Josh Boyer (jwb) * Brian Pepple (bpepple) * Bill Nottingham (notting) * David Woodhouse (dwmw2) * Jarod Wilson (j-rod) * Dennis Gilmore (dgilmore)
Members Absent
Threat Assessment
FESCo agreed unanimously to make the threat assessment conducted by Mike McGrath public once some inaccuracies noted by Dennis are corrected.
FPC Report
FESCo approved the Wordpress plugins guideline by a 9-0 vote.
FESCo approved the guidelines for common package name conflicts by a 8-0 vote.
FESCo approved the alternatives guidelines by a 9-0 vote.
Feature: liblvm - Features/liblvm
FESCo added some questions to the Talk section, and tabled discussion until the feature owner could respond.
Feature: Dracut - Features/Dracut
FESCo approved dracut by a 7-0 vote, and voiced that it should receive a lot of testing.
Fedora 11 gcc-4.4 feature incomplete
FESCo noted that this feature listed completion at 70%, and contacted the maintainer about it getting properly updated with what we were actually shipping.
rel-eng questions
Release engineering asked if FESCo objected to repodata signing, or continued work on deltarpm support for Fedora 11 and rawhide. There were no objections.
zsync shipping internal zlib
FESCo generally disapproved of the idea of zsync shipping its own internal zlib, and offered alternative suggestions for implementation. There was no vote.
Meeting log
For more information, see the full meeting log.