From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
m (internal link cleaning) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=== Codecs (2008-09-16) === | === Codecs (2008-09-16) === | ||
* | * [[Features/GStreamer_dependencies_in_RPM]] | ||
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438225 | * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438225 | ||
* Seth Vidal is going to meet with Richard Hughes to make sure a EULA associated with a specific package or codec works correctly with PackageKit and associated packages | * Seth Vidal is going to meet with Richard Hughes to make sure a EULA associated with a specific package or codec works correctly with PackageKit and associated packages | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*# Fedora will '''only''' handle packages with EULAs through <code>PackageKit</code> | *# Fedora will '''only''' handle packages with EULAs through <code>PackageKit</code> | ||
*# Fedora does not foresee ever having packages in the official Fedora repos that contain EULAs | *# Fedora does not foresee ever having packages in the official Fedora repos that contain EULAs | ||
** Remaining questions for | ** Remaining questions for follow-up: | ||
*# What is the regular | *# What is the regular work flow for codecs in F10 when someone goes to play a media file with a gstreamer enabled player? | ||
*# What will be the default behavior for a default installation? | *# What will be the default behavior for a default installation? | ||
*# Can we confirm that we are no longer prompting for any specific vendor? | *# Can we confirm that we are no longer prompting for any specific vendor? | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* Board wants to maintain a good hold on how the primary Fedora trademark is used while provides lots of latitude for secondary mark | * Board wants to maintain a good hold on how the primary Fedora trademark is used while provides lots of latitude for secondary mark | ||
* Process of legal review continues and appears to be moving forward favorably | * Process of legal review continues and appears to be moving forward favorably | ||
* trademark guidelines draft has recently been updated and can be found here: | * trademark guidelines draft has recently been updated and can be found here: [[User:Pfrields/NewTrademarkGuidelines]] | ||
* '''UPDATE 2008-09-23''' | * '''UPDATE 2008-09-23''' | ||
** Paul Frields has a meeting with with Red Hat legal this week | ** Paul Frields has a meeting with with Red Hat legal this week | ||
[[Category:Board meetings]] | |||
Latest revision as of 08:22, 18 September 2016
Fedora Project Board Meeting :: Tuesday 2008-09-23
Roll Call
Attendees: John Poelstra, Matt Domsch, Paul Frields, Karsten Wade, Jef Spaleta, Bill Nottingham, Chris Tyler, Seth Vidal, Spot Callaway, Jesse Keating
Regrets: Harald Hoyer
Followup to Previous Business
Codecs (2008-09-16)
- Features/GStreamer_dependencies_in_RPM
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438225
- Seth Vidal is going to meet with Richard Hughes to make sure a EULA associated with a specific package or codec works correctly with PackageKit and associated packages
- UPDATE 2008-09-23
- RESOLUTIONS
- Fedora will only handle packages with EULAs through
PackageKit - Fedora does not foresee ever having packages in the official Fedora repos that contain EULAs
- Remaining questions for follow-up:
- What is the regular work flow for codecs in F10 when someone goes to play a media file with a gstreamer enabled player?
- What will be the default behavior for a default installation?
- Can we confirm that we are no longer prompting for any specific vendor?
- Spot to track down answers to the remaining questions
Trademark Update (2008-09-16)
- Board wants to maintain a good hold on how the primary Fedora trademark is used while provides lots of latitude for secondary mark
- Process of legal review continues and appears to be moving forward favorably
- trademark guidelines draft has recently been updated and can be found here: User:Pfrields/NewTrademarkGuidelines
- UPDATE 2008-09-23
- Paul Frields has a meeting with with Red Hat legal this week