From Fedora Project Wiki

(New section: Test Plan)
(add link to video on the feature to release notes?)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Incomplete Items For Feature Acceptance (2008-07-08) =
== Test Plan ==


Please update the following items and change the category of this page to CategoryProposedFedora10 once they are completed.  The feature wrangler's have a watch on this page and will see your changes.
The test plan says "different wireless security settings" - could you suggest some specific settings to test?
It'd be also good if we knew which were the more common settings In The Wild.


# Can you clarify the summary--this is between two separate machines or the same machine?  All wireless?
MatthiasClasen: I don't know anything about this, all the wireless acronymns
# Can you add a little more to the ''user experience'' section so people have a  better idea how this will work?
only confuse me...I'll ask Dan to provide some input.
# Please complete the documentation section
# Please complete the release notes section with your proposed text explaining the virtures of this great new feature :).


- At one point, you mention 'configuring the card as an access point', at another you mention 'in ad-hoc mode'. For people who have been around wireless too long, they may think of these as two different things. (And not all cards support Master mode.)
[2008-07-21] dcbw: clarified in the main article.  You can only use open, WEP-40, WEP-128, and WPA-PSK. Since there is no central authentication server with adhoc wifi networks, you cannot use any 802.1x-based methods like WPA[2]-Enterprise or LEAP.


== Test Plan ==
As for "different operating systems on the second laptop" - is (some windows variant) and (some OS X variant) sufficient, or do we also need to test other Linux distros, specific Windows/OS X versions, etc?
 
MatthiasClasen: The more the better, I'd say. But certainly, Windows, OS X, iphone would be the most important ones.
 
[2008-07-21] dcbw: clarified in the main article.  I believe that any OS should work here, as long as that OS performs DHCP when connecting to ad-hoc wifi networks.  I'm 85% sure that Mac OS X does this, unsure about Windows.  This should be tested.
 
[2008-07-21] dcbw: note that kernel drivers are still pretty spotty in Ad-Hoc mode, that will get fixed up as time goes on and I've already pushed a bunch of fixes into 2.6.26 and posted them to 2.6.25-stable as well.  Some mac80211-based drivers don't have all the support required for Ad-Hoc mode, though most older full-mac drivers like ipw2100, ipw2200, ipw2915, airo, orinoco, hostap, libertas, and atmel should work fine.
 
[2008-07-27] tsd: how would this work a dialup connection or could it?
 
What about this scenario: You connect to a wifi network and want to share that connection via your ethernet device --[[User:Pirast|Pirast]] 21:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


The test plan says "different wireless security settings" - could you suggest some specific settings to test?
It'd be also good if we knew which were the more common settings In The Wild.


As for "different operating systems on the second laptop" - is (some windows variant) and (some OS X variant) sufficient, or do we also need to test other Linux distros, specific Windows/OS X versions, etc?
== Release Notes ==
[2008-10-17] dmalcolm: There's a video about this feature here:
http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/10/16/video-fedora-10-connection-sharing/
Should this be added to the release notes?

Latest revision as of 14:22, 17 October 2008

Test Plan

The test plan says "different wireless security settings" - could you suggest some specific settings to test? It'd be also good if we knew which were the more common settings In The Wild.

MatthiasClasen: I don't know anything about this, all the wireless acronymns only confuse me...I'll ask Dan to provide some input.

[2008-07-21] dcbw: clarified in the main article. You can only use open, WEP-40, WEP-128, and WPA-PSK. Since there is no central authentication server with adhoc wifi networks, you cannot use any 802.1x-based methods like WPA[2]-Enterprise or LEAP.

As for "different operating systems on the second laptop" - is (some windows variant) and (some OS X variant) sufficient, or do we also need to test other Linux distros, specific Windows/OS X versions, etc?

MatthiasClasen: The more the better, I'd say. But certainly, Windows, OS X, iphone would be the most important ones.

[2008-07-21] dcbw: clarified in the main article. I believe that any OS should work here, as long as that OS performs DHCP when connecting to ad-hoc wifi networks. I'm 85% sure that Mac OS X does this, unsure about Windows. This should be tested.

[2008-07-21] dcbw: note that kernel drivers are still pretty spotty in Ad-Hoc mode, that will get fixed up as time goes on and I've already pushed a bunch of fixes into 2.6.26 and posted them to 2.6.25-stable as well. Some mac80211-based drivers don't have all the support required for Ad-Hoc mode, though most older full-mac drivers like ipw2100, ipw2200, ipw2915, airo, orinoco, hostap, libertas, and atmel should work fine.

[2008-07-27] tsd: how would this work a dialup connection or could it?

What about this scenario: You connect to a wifi network and want to share that connection via your ethernet device --Pirast 21:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


Release Notes

[2008-10-17] dmalcolm: There's a video about this feature here: http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/10/16/video-fedora-10-connection-sharing/ Should this be added to the release notes?