m (→Current status) |
(Add trackers) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
This change should inform maintainers and developers about effort to remove libdb in future. | This change should inform maintainers and developers about effort to remove libdb (with all subpackages) in future. | ||
<!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this change is and what it will do. This information is used for the overall changeset summary page for each release. | <!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this change is and what it will do. This information is used for the overall changeset summary page for each release. | ||
Note that motivation for the change should be in the Benefit to Fedora section below, and this part should answer the question "What?" rather than "Why?". --> | Note that motivation for the change should be in the Benefit to Fedora section below, and this part should answer the question "What?" rather than "Why?". --> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
--> | --> | ||
* FESCo ticket: [https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2379 #2379] | * FESCo ticket: [https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2379 #2379] | ||
* Tracker bug: | * Tracker bug: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834842 #1834842] | ||
* Release notes tracker: | * Release notes tracker: [https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/release-notes/issue/505 #505] | ||
== Detailed Description == | == Detailed Description == | ||
| Line 143: | Line 143: | ||
*kdesvn | *kdesvn | ||
*libetpan | *libetpan | ||
*libopendkim | *libopendkim [https://github.com/trusteddomainproject/OpenDKIM/issues/71 Upstream issue] | ||
*libserf | *libserf | ||
*lizardfs-master | *lizardfs-master | ||
| Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
*nss_updatedb | *nss_updatedb | ||
*nvi | *nvi | ||
*opendkim | *opendkim [https://github.com/trusteddomainproject/OpenDKIM/issues/71 Upstream issue] | ||
*openldap-servers | *openldap-servers | ||
*opensips-db_berkeley | *opensips-db_berkeley | ||
| Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
--> | --> | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:ChangeAcceptedF33]] | ||
<!-- When your change proposal page is completed and ready for review and announcement --> | <!-- When your change proposal page is completed and ready for review and announcement --> | ||
<!-- remove Category:ChangePageIncomplete and change it to Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler --> | <!-- remove Category:ChangePageIncomplete and change it to Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler --> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:12, 12 May 2020
Mark libdb as deprecated
Summary
This change should inform maintainers and developers about effort to remove libdb (with all subpackages) in future.
Owner
- Name: Filip Januš
- Email: fjanus@redhat.com
Current status
- Targeted release: Fedora 33
- Last updated: 2020-05-12
- FESCo ticket: #2379
- Tracker bug: #1834842
- Release notes tracker: #505
Detailed Description
We would like to remove libdb from Fedora in future, because BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2) and due many projects can't use it. Nowadays Fedora uses the old version (5.3.28) and we can't update to newer. Due to many projects have libdb dependency, we propose few steps to complete removal. First step would mark libdb as deprecated package in Fedora 33. Next steps in Fedora 35 would provide converting tool for existing databases and mark libdb as orphaned.
Benefit to Fedora
We would like to have most recent releases of components in Fedora, which are supported by upstreams. But due to licence of BerkeleyDB we need to hold old BerkeleyDB version in Fedora.
Scope
- Proposal owners: Not needed for this change - only deprecation
- Other developers: Developers should prepare own projects(scripts, programs, packages, ...) for the next change and for the complete libdb removal.
- Release engineering: #Releng issue number (a check of an impact with Release Engineering is needed)
- Policies and guidelines: Not needed for this change - only deprecation
- Trademark approval: Not needed for this change - only deprecation
Upgrade/compatibility impact
This change hasn't direct impact onto actual dependencies. Purpose of this change is inform and prepare people to future change which will affect many components.
Here is short discussion from Fedora-devel list.
As I mentioned above we would like to remove libdb in the best case in Fedora 35. And time between F33 and F35 we would like to use for discussion about solution, which could transfer existing libdb databases to other and try to find solution for components which supports only libdb.
User Experience
There is no change for users. Package is marked only as deprecated package and behaves as before.
Dependencies
- Libdb has many dependencies:
- 389-ds-base
- apr-util-bdb
- bind-sdb
- bogofilter
- cld
- clisp
- cyrus-sasl-lib
- dsniff
- evolution-data-server
- exim
- heimdal
- iproute
- ipv6calc
- isync
- jabberd
- jigdo
- jigdo-gui
- kdesvn
- libetpan
- libopendkim Upstream issue
- libserf
- lizardfs-master
- mesos
- mod_dav_svn
- mod_perl
- mod_qos
- mod_security
- netatalk
- nmh
- nss_updatedb
- nvi
- opendkim Upstream issue
- openldap-servers
- opensips-db_berkeley
- opensmtpd
- pam
- pam_abl
- pam_ccreds
- perdition
- perl-BDB
- perl-BerkeleyDB
- perl-DB_File
- perl-eperl
- php-dba
- pl
- postfix
- python3-bsddb3
- rapidsvn
- redland
- reprepro
- rpm
- rsvndump
- sendmail
- sks
- spamprobe
- squid
- squidGuard
- subversion
- tqsllib
- trustedqsl
- webalizer
- xemacs
Contingency Plan
- Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) N/A (not a System Wide Change)
- Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
- Blocks release? No
- Blocks product? None
Documentation
There is no upstream documentation, but here is a list of dependencies with some useful comments and here some possible alternatives.