No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:ProposedFeature]] | ||
<!-- When your feature page is completed and ready for review --> | <!-- When your feature page is completed and ready for review --> | ||
<!-- remove Category:FeaturePageIncomplete and change it to Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler --> | <!-- remove Category:FeaturePageIncomplete and change it to Category:FeatureReadyForWrangler --> | ||
<!-- After review, the feature wrangler will move your page to Category:FeatureReadyForFesco... if it still needs more work it will move back to Category:FeaturePageIncomplete--> | <!-- After review, the feature wrangler will move your page to Category:FeatureReadyForFesco... if it still needs more work it will move back to Category:FeaturePageIncomplete--> | ||
<!-- A pretty picture of the page category usage is at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Process --> | <!-- A pretty picture of the page category usage is at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Process --> | ||
Latest revision as of 18:21, 4 November 2008
Quality Assurance
Summary
Bringing current QA project to SQA
Owner
Current status
- Targeted release: Fedora 11
- Last updated: 2008-11-04
- Percentage of completion: 01%
Detailed Description
QA
- Creation of QA board which would be elected or otherwise selected individuals from each "sub project"
- Fesco could be that board.
SQC
Oh great time out in the wiki on what I had written teaches me to save more often.
Here's sum of what I had written hit me with questions and I will answer...
- Improving documentation on the wiki
- Create a calender on the wiki which project assign them self to a certain time slots and what to test
- Build an automated test system.
- Build a better/more active test community.
- Get developers to redirect test traffic from the devel-list to the test-list
- Get Gnome/KDE/XFCE etc to have something like properties item which would show what's being executed and perhaps
to which package it belongs to get correcter bug reports.
- Create each listen "component" in bugzilla to have it's own wiki page with relevant info on debuging testing etc see
Anaconda for example. VERY VITAL THAT THIS IS ACHIEVED.
- and more...
Benefit to Fedora
- Improved Documentation
- Proper QA process
- Better bug reports
- Better testing.
- Easier triaging
Scope
Requires Developers/maintainers of listed components in bugzilla to create or assist in creating its own wiki page.
Test Plan
This is mostly wiki add-ons/changes. There will be some RFE that can be tested if they are accepted by upstream...
User Experience
The project itself will get a more professional QA. Developers will get better bug reports. Tester will learn more.
Dependencies
Depends highly on each bugzilla component has it wiki page..
Contingency Plan
Keep the process as is...
Documentation
QA Will hold the new QA wikipage along with it sub pages.. Hack at will...
Release Notes
Comments and Discussion
- See Talk:Features/QA