From Fedora Project Wiki

< FWN‎ | Beats

 
(24 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
Contributing Writer:  [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]]
Contributing Writer:  [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]]


=== Change freeze begins tomorrow ===
=== Intrusion update ===
[[MikeMcGrath| Mike McGrath]] sent a link <ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-March/msg00010.html</ref> to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00277.html</ref>


[[MikeMcGrath|Mike McGrath]] wrote[1] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list sent out a reminder that another pre-release change freeze will start and last till 11-05-2008.
Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.


[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-October/msg00070.html
There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.


[[Dennis Gilmore|DennisGilmore]] started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00294.html</ref> on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication.
It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.


=== FAS dump breakage ===
<references/>
 
[[MichaelSchwendt|Michael Schwendt]] wrote[2] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list that there has been an invalid entry returned by the FAS group dump for some time: bbs,disabled,james francis toy iv,user,0.
 
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-October/msg00089.html
 
To this [[NigelJones|Nigel Jones]] added that [2] The comma is part of the persons name, it needs to be either escaped or the delimiter changed (maybe a | or something). Mike [3] however said that
there aren't any comma's in that persons name, its in his email address.
 
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-October/msg00090.html
 
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-October/msg00092.html

Latest revision as of 04:36, 6 April 2009

Infrastructure

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-infrastructure-list

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure

Contributing Writer: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala

Intrusion update

Mike McGrath sent a link [1] to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.[2]

Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.

There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.

DennisGilmore started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims[3] on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication. It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.