From Fedora Project Wiki

< FWN‎ | Beats

 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
Contributing Writer:  [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]]
Contributing Writer:  [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]]


=== Calendaring system  ===
=== Intrusion update ===
[[MikeMcGrath| Mike McGrath]] sent a link <ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-March/msg00010.html</ref> to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00277.html</ref>


Discussion on this topic continues from last week. [[AdamWilliamson|Adam Williamson]]
Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.
said <ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-February/msg00094.html
</ref> that there are a couple of calendaring plugins which will allow for "days" will be allocated.


[[ClintSavage| Clint Savage]] mentioned that the point is that it should support caldev or something better<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-February/msg00095.html</ref>
There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.


<references/>
[[Dennis Gilmore|DennisGilmore]] started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00294.html</ref> on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication.
 
It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.
=== wordpress-mu install ===
 
[[MikeMcGrath| Mike McGrath]] asked who wanted to finalize our wordpress-mu install<ref>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-February/msg00120.html</ref>
Mike further said that it has got built and there is a ticket for it<ref>https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/342</ref>
 
<references/>
 
=== cgit to replace gitweb? ===
 
[[SethVidal| Seth Vidal]] said<ref> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-February/msg00139.html</ref>that he has setup cgit as a replacement for gitweb on hosted2 and it is available at hosted2.fedoraproject.org/cgit/
He said that he would like to replace gitweb as a web based git repo browser but that would mean that the urls from gitweb will not work any more. He said that he would like to get some feedback on this.
 
[[BillNottingham|Bill Nottingham]] suggested<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-February/msg00143.html</ref> that we may be able to able to do a rewrite rule.


<references/>
<references/>

Latest revision as of 04:36, 6 April 2009

Infrastructure

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-infrastructure-list

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure

Contributing Writer: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala

Intrusion update

Mike McGrath sent a link [1] to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.[2]

Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.

There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.

DennisGilmore started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims[3] on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication. It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.