SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2009-07-21: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 16:29, 21 July 2009

topics to discuss:
- should we support old artwork + fedora system logo
- defining @critical-path-kde group (task delegated to the SIG for each spin by FESCo)
recent bugs:
- (none)

should we support old artwork + fedora system logo

should we ship old artwork?
- most of KDE SIG members voted yes if it's not broken
- we need testers
problem with fedora system logo
- should we use system-logo-white or our own system-logo-kde?
- install it to /usr/share/pixmaps
- what about generic logo?
jreznik will ask design team and start mailing list thread (this one? :D)

defining @critical-path-kde group (task delegated to the SIG for each spin by FESCo)

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 == Transcript ==
-[[:Media:KDE-SIG-2009-07-21.txt|KDE-SIG-2009-07-21.txt]]
+[http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-21/fedora-meeting.2009-07-21-14.10.html Meeting minutes]
+[http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-07-21/fedora-meeting.2009-07-21-14.10.log.html Full log]
 == Summary ==
+'''should we support old artwork + fedora system logo'''
+* should we ship old artwork?
+** most of KDE SIG members voted yes if it's not broken
+** we need testers
+* problem with fedora system logo
+** should we use system-logo-white or our own system-logo-kde?
+** install it to /usr/share/pixmaps
+** what about generic logo?
+* jreznik will ask design team and start mailing list thread (this one? :D)
-=== recent bugs ===
+'''defining @critical-path-kde group (task delegated to the SIG for each spin by FESCo)'''
+* KDM into @critical-path-kde
+* do we want to be involved?
+** or we want our own testing?
+* who will be responsible for QA?
+* KevinKofler will check it...
 == Comments ==