|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = Can Spins/SIGS or Fedora remixes define their own target audience? = | | = Can Spins/SIGS or Fedora remixes define their own target audience? = |
|
| |
|
| === Background ===
| | This content has moved to: |
|
| |
|
| The Board has been working on defining a target audience for Fedora. In response to this, some people feel that Fedora should allow sub-groups to define their own target audience. Or even more strongly that Spins/SIGs should be the '''only''' groups defining target audience; in other words, the Board should not be defining one. An example mail supporting this position is [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2009-October/007430.html this mail] from Toshio.
| | [[User:Mdomsch/SWG_Spins]] |
| | |
| However, the potential conflict between a Board target audience and a SIG target audience is still theoretical. No SIG appears to have explicitly disagreed with the "working" target audience proposal.
| |
| | |
| In the present situation, Spins must take all of their content from the official Fedora repositories.
| |
| | |
| === Questions for Spins and the Spins SIG ===
| |
| | |
| Given the present situation:
| |
| | |
| # Has any Spin found the present situation unduly restrictive?
| |
| ## If so, how specifically?
| |
| # Has any Spin found they cannot address their target audience properly?
| |
| ## If so, in what way?
| |
| ## Is the root problem that all packages must be in the official repositories?
| |
| # How are you addressing this today?
| |
| # How would you like to address this in the future?
| |
| # Are the resources you would need readily available?
| |
| ## If not, what would you need to properly address this?
| |
| | |
| | |
| === Possible Solutions ===
| |
| | |
| | |
| === Risk/Benefit ===
| |
|
| |
|
| [[Category:Strategic working group]] | | [[Category:Strategic working group]] |
