From Fedora Project Wiki
(Added todo) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Rpmlint should check if there are manual page for each binary/script | * Rpmlint should check if there are manual page for each binary/script | ||
** BugZilla: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572090 572090] | ** BugZilla: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572090 572090] | ||
** Status: | ** Status: [http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1747 Applied upstream] | ||
* Rpmlint should check if there isn't two binaries with same name in the standard binary directories | * Rpmlint should check if there isn't two binaries with same name in the standard binary directories | ||
** BugZilla: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id= | ** BugZilla: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572097 572097] | ||
** Status: [http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1745 Applied upstream] | ** Status: [http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1745 Applied upstream] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:15, 22 April 2010
Recently some requirements to rpmlint functionality occurs. This wiki page tries to summarize them and provide information about progress of the implementation.
- Rpmlint should check if there are manual page for each binary/script
- BugZilla: 572090
- Status: Applied upstream
- Rpmlint should check if there isn't two binaries with same name in the standard binary directories
- BugZilla: 572097
- Status: Applied upstream
- Rpmlint should check if specfile contains both Fedora and RHEL conditional
- BugZilla: 572158
- Status: Patch proposed
- Rpmlint should check macros in the comments
- BugZilla: 571375
- Status: Applied upstream
TODO:
This checks are in planning state. It is not even decided if they are doable.
- One file in two subpackages (Issues: %files -f for reading file list from file; usage of *)
If you have some suggestions for another useful rpmlint features, please contact Rnovacek.