From Fedora Project Wiki

No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== What is CloudFS ==
== What is HekaFS ==


CloudFS is built on top of [http://gluster.org/ Gluster]. It provides a set of translators to make Gluster more suitable as a cloud file system. CloudFS is a feature for the Fedora 16 release, and the [[Cloud SIG|Fedora Cloud special interest group (SIG)]] is actively involved in development and testing.
HekaFS (formerly CloudFS) is built on top of [http://gluster.org/ Gluster]. It provides a set of translators to make Gluster more suitable as a cloud file system. HekaFS is a feature for the Fedora 16 release, and the [[Cloud SIG|Fedora Cloud special interest group (SIG)]] is actively involved in development and testing.


The Fedora [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/CloudFS CloudFS] feature page has information about the status of CloudFS as a feature in a future release of Fedora.
The Fedora [[Features/HekaFS |HekaFS]] feature page has information about the status of HekaFS as a feature in a future release of Fedora.


See Jeff Darcy's [http://cloudfs.org/ CloudFS] blog to learn more about the philosophy of CloudFS and find out what's happening with CloudFS development.
See Jeff Darcy's [http://hekafs.org/ HekaFS] blog to learn more about the philosophy of HekaFS and find out what's happening with HekaFS development.


== How to use CloudFS ==
== Test Day:2011-10-20 HekaFS ==


[http://kkeithle.fedorapeople.org/cloudfs.html CloudFS Setup] has rudimentary instructions, including where to get source and RPMs, for installing CloudFS on a cluster, including a simple web-based UI to provision CloudFS volumes.
[[Test Day:2011-10-20 HekaFS]]


General CloudFS discussions are at: https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cloudfs-general
== How to use HekaFS ==


Red Hat Cloud OpenShift uses CloudFS. The user community for that product is found at: http://www.redhat.com/openshift/forums
General HekaFS discussions are at: https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cloudfs-general


== How to participate in CloudFS ==
Red Hat Cloud OpenShift uses HekaFS. The user community for that product is found at: http://www.redhat.com/openshift/forums
 
Here's a guide to setting up a simple [[SimpleHekaFS|HekaFS Cluster]].
 
== How to participate in HekaFS ==


Let's start with some important links.
Let's start with some important links.


* The upstream project overview (slides, blog posts) is at http://cloudfs.org/cloudfs-overview/
* The upstream project overview (slides, blog posts) is at http://hekafs.org/cloudfs-overview/
* The source repository is at: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=CloudFS.git
* The source repository is at: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=CloudFS.git
* The developer mailing list is at: https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cloudfs-devel
* The developer mailing list is at: https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cloudfs-devel
* The user mailing list (pretty empty so far) is at https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cloudfs-general
* The user mailing list (pretty empty so far) is at https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cloudfs-general


CloudFS is still under active development, so there are still many ways to contribute.  Here are some possibilities.
HekaFS is still under active development, so there are still many ways to contribute.  Here are some possibilities.


* Use it, report bugs, suggest features.  The packaging and documentation are still works in progress, so this might require some interaction with one of the developers, but we don't bite.  Feel free to contact jdarcy@fedoraproject.org, jdarcy@redhat.com, or jeff@pl.atyp.us - all the same person - and I'd be delighted to help you through it.
* Use it, report bugs, suggest features.  The packaging and documentation are still works in progress, so this might require some interaction with one of the developers, but we don't bite.  Feel free to contact jdarcy@fedoraproject.org, jdarcy@redhat.com, or jeff@pl.atyp.us - all the same person - and I'd be delighted to help you through it.


* Use the upstream (http://gluster.org), report bugs, suggest features.  For the most part, CloudFS is GlusterFS with a couple of extra bits, so many of the issues you're likely to experience are actually GlusterFS issues.  CloudFS is not just its own code, though.  It's also a sort of unofficial "CloudFS SIG" within the GlusterFS community.  If you want GlusterFS fixes or enhancements because of your interest in CloudFS, we can drive those as part of CloudFS.
* Use the upstream (http://gluster.org), report bugs, suggest features.  For the most part, HekaFS is GlusterFS with a couple of extra bits, so many of the issues you're likely to experience are actually GlusterFS issues.  HekaFS is not just its own code, though.  It's also a sort of unofficial "CloudFS SIG" within the GlusterFS community.  If you want GlusterFS fixes or enhancements because of your interest in HekaFS, we can drive those as part of HekaFS.


* Say hi in Freenode IRC.  #cloudfs is pretty dead (let's fix that), but #gluster and #fedora-cloud are pretty lively.
* Say hi in Freenode IRC.  #cloudfs is pretty dead (let's fix that), but #gluster and #fedora-cloud are pretty lively.
* Help with packaging.  None of the current CloudFS developers are all that good with specfiles and stuff, so help here would be greatly appreciated.


* Help with documentation.  There are several bits of documentation in the source tree, but a little loving from a genuine wordsmith would go a long way.
* Help with documentation.  There are several bits of documentation in the source tree, but a little loving from a genuine wordsmith would go a long way.


* Improve the user interface.  There is a web-based management UI with pretty good functionality - here are some [http://cloudfs.org/2011/05/new-management-interface/ screenshots and stuff] - but the user experience is pretty old-school.  If you're a real web programmer who knows all the modern AJAX/JavaScript ways of doing stuff, or a graphic designer, I'm sure you could make something a lot better.
* Improve the user interface.  There is a web-based management UI with pretty good functionality - here are some [http://hekafs.org/2011/05/new-management-interface/ screenshots and stuff] - but the user experience is pretty old-school.  If you're a real web programmer who knows all the modern AJAX/JavaScript ways of doing stuff, or a graphic designer, I'm sure you could make something a lot better.


* Improve the core code.  Some parts of CloudFS are practically done, but others are still in active development and there's still plenty of room for more developers.  In particular, if you're a security/cryptography expert, more review of those pieces would be most welcome.  People might look at CloudFS as a more secure alternatives to Dropbox or Jungledisk, both of which have had problems in this area recently, so this is a great area to focus on.  Despite being a file system this is not kernel code, by the way.  It should be relatively free of those additional complications and comprehensible to non-kernel programmers.
* Improve the core code.  Some parts of HekaFS are practically done, but others are still in active development and there's still plenty of room for more developers.  In particular, if you're a security/cryptography expert, more review of those pieces would be most welcome.  People might look at HekaFS as a more secure alternatives to Dropbox or Jungledisk, both of which have had problems in this area recently, so this is a great area to focus on.  Despite being a file system this is not kernel code, by the way.  It should be relatively free of those additional complications and comprehensible to non-kernel programmers.


* Get the word out.  The number of participants is directly proportional to the number of people who've heard about it, and some people who might want to contribute might not even know we're here.  Blog, tweet, whatever, let people know that there's an open-source project to create a scalable, secure, multi-tenant filesystem.
* Get the word out.  The number of participants is directly proportional to the number of people who've heard about it, and some people who might want to contribute might not even know we're here.  Blog, tweet, whatever, let people know that there's an open-source project to create a scalable, secure, multi-tenant filesystem.


[[Category:Cloud SIG]]
[[Category:Cloud SIG]]

Latest revision as of 12:34, 18 September 2012

What is HekaFS

HekaFS (formerly CloudFS) is built on top of Gluster. It provides a set of translators to make Gluster more suitable as a cloud file system. HekaFS is a feature for the Fedora 16 release, and the Fedora Cloud special interest group (SIG) is actively involved in development and testing.

The Fedora HekaFS feature page has information about the status of HekaFS as a feature in a future release of Fedora.

See Jeff Darcy's HekaFS blog to learn more about the philosophy of HekaFS and find out what's happening with HekaFS development.

Test Day:2011-10-20 HekaFS

Test Day:2011-10-20 HekaFS

How to use HekaFS

General HekaFS discussions are at: https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cloudfs-general

Red Hat Cloud OpenShift uses HekaFS. The user community for that product is found at: http://www.redhat.com/openshift/forums

Here's a guide to setting up a simple HekaFS Cluster.

How to participate in HekaFS

Let's start with some important links.

HekaFS is still under active development, so there are still many ways to contribute. Here are some possibilities.

  • Use it, report bugs, suggest features. The packaging and documentation are still works in progress, so this might require some interaction with one of the developers, but we don't bite. Feel free to contact jdarcy@fedoraproject.org, jdarcy@redhat.com, or jeff@pl.atyp.us - all the same person - and I'd be delighted to help you through it.
  • Use the upstream (http://gluster.org), report bugs, suggest features. For the most part, HekaFS is GlusterFS with a couple of extra bits, so many of the issues you're likely to experience are actually GlusterFS issues. HekaFS is not just its own code, though. It's also a sort of unofficial "CloudFS SIG" within the GlusterFS community. If you want GlusterFS fixes or enhancements because of your interest in HekaFS, we can drive those as part of HekaFS.
  • Say hi in Freenode IRC. #cloudfs is pretty dead (let's fix that), but #gluster and #fedora-cloud are pretty lively.
  • Help with documentation. There are several bits of documentation in the source tree, but a little loving from a genuine wordsmith would go a long way.
  • Improve the user interface. There is a web-based management UI with pretty good functionality - here are some screenshots and stuff - but the user experience is pretty old-school. If you're a real web programmer who knows all the modern AJAX/JavaScript ways of doing stuff, or a graphic designer, I'm sure you could make something a lot better.
  • Improve the core code. Some parts of HekaFS are practically done, but others are still in active development and there's still plenty of room for more developers. In particular, if you're a security/cryptography expert, more review of those pieces would be most welcome. People might look at HekaFS as a more secure alternatives to Dropbox or Jungledisk, both of which have had problems in this area recently, so this is a great area to focus on. Despite being a file system this is not kernel code, by the way. It should be relatively free of those additional complications and comprehensible to non-kernel programmers.
  • Get the word out. The number of participants is directly proportional to the number of people who've heard about it, and some people who might want to contribute might not even know we're here. Blog, tweet, whatever, let people know that there's an open-source project to create a scalable, secure, multi-tenant filesystem.