No edit summary |
Immanetize (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
--[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14 May 2012 | --[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14 May 2012 | ||
See [https://bugzilla.redhat. | See [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801626 rhbz#801626]. | ||
--[[User:jpokorny|jpokorny]] 27 July 2012 | --[[User:jpokorny|jpokorny]] 27 July 2012 | ||
added to release notes at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_System_Daemons_Beat [[User:Immanetize|Immanetize]] ([[User talk:Immanetize|talk]]) 17:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:18, 26 October 2012
- ..."some of the newly written patches were incompatible with sources maintained by other distributors. A similar incompatibility could be noticed in the applications behaviour and their command line switches"...
Yet "User Experience" says "No major changes expected" - can both be true?
The "Release notes" section should contain release notes for Fedora - probably listing the incompatible changes.
--Mitr 14:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Question that is related but not directly relevant for the feature acceptance: is there any reason why this isn't integrated into util-linux?
--Lennart 15:48, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Please, please, please no more *-ng projects. It makes almost no sense. Just take over the package, nobody cares; and changing names causes nothing but trouble for no good reason. Or just merge it into util-linux, which makes the most sense of all options. It can share a lot off stuff, and we do not really need separate maintenance for such packages anyway.
--Kay 14 May 2012
See rhbz#801626.
--jpokorny 27 July 2012
added to release notes at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_System_Daemons_Beat Immanetize (talk) 17:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)