From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
|||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Rekonq | * Rekonq | ||
Votes | {| class="wikitable" | style="text-align:center;" | ||
!colspan="4" | Palsma WG Votes | |||
|- | |||
* | ! User | ||
* | ! Firefox | ||
* | ! Konqueror <BR> +webkit | ||
! Rekonq | |||
|- | |||
| ltinkl || 1 || 0 || 2 | |||
|- | |||
| rdieter || 2 || 1 || 1 | |||
|- | |||
| kkofler || 0 || 2 || 2 | |||
|- | |||
| jreznik || 2 || 0 || 2 | |||
|- | |||
| mbriza || 2 || 0 || 2 | |||
|- | |||
| jgrulich || 2 || 0 || 1 | |||
|- | |||
| than || 2 || 0 || 1 | |||
|- | |||
| dvratil || 2 || 0 || 1 | |||
|- | |||
| tosky || 2 || 0 || 2 | |||
|- | |||
| ptoscano || 2 || 1 || 1 | |||
|- | |||
| '''Totals''' || '''17''' ||''' 4''' ||''' 15''' | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" | style="text-align:center;" | |||
!colspan="6" | KDE SIG Votes <BR> (non-binding, informational only) | |||
|- | |||
! User | |||
! Firefox | |||
! Konqueror <BR> +webkit | |||
! Rekonq | |||
! Other | |||
! Other Detail | |||
|- | |||
| danofsatx || 0 || 0 || 2 || 1 || QupZilla | |||
|- | |||
| '''Totals''' || '''0''' ||''' 0''' ||''' 2''' ||'''1'''|| | |||
|} | |||
== Non-KDE/Qt educational/scientific software == | |||
I don't think: | |||
* many G* libs as part of core system | |||
is a suitable answer to that at all. GTK+ itself is going to be forced on us by the Anaconda stack anyway for the foreseeable future. As for the other libraries, are there even any useful scientific or educational applications built on them? The only GTK+-based scientific apps I can think of right now do not require the usual G* libraries, but one specific library and the usual GTK+ 2 or 3 stack: | |||
* wxMaxima requires wxGTK, and through it GTK+ 2, no other G* stuff | |||
* gnome-chemistry-utils requires goffice (and libgsf that's part of the goffice stack), otherwise just the usual GTK+ 3 stack | |||
Otherwise, the non-KDE/Qt scientific software I can think of does not use GTK+ at all, but, e.g.: | |||
* Tcl/Tk: many electronics apps, xmaxima, … | |||
* FLTK: xcas (not yet packaged in Fedora), … | |||
So "G* libs" is the wrong answer for this topic. | |||
--[[User:Kkofler|Kkofler]] ([[User talk:Kkofler|talk]]) 08:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 8 April 2014
Default web browser
Range voting, 0..2, choices are:
- Firefox
- Konqueror + webkit part
- Rekonq
| Palsma WG Votes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| User | Firefox | Konqueror +webkit |
Rekonq |
| ltinkl | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| rdieter | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| kkofler | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| jreznik | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| mbriza | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| jgrulich | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| than | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| dvratil | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| tosky | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| ptoscano | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Totals | 17 | 4 | 15 |
| KDE SIG Votes (non-binding, informational only) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| User | Firefox | Konqueror +webkit |
Rekonq | Other | Other Detail |
| danofsatx | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | QupZilla |
| Totals | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
Non-KDE/Qt educational/scientific software
I don't think:
- many G* libs as part of core system
is a suitable answer to that at all. GTK+ itself is going to be forced on us by the Anaconda stack anyway for the foreseeable future. As for the other libraries, are there even any useful scientific or educational applications built on them? The only GTK+-based scientific apps I can think of right now do not require the usual G* libraries, but one specific library and the usual GTK+ 2 or 3 stack:
- wxMaxima requires wxGTK, and through it GTK+ 2, no other G* stuff
- gnome-chemistry-utils requires goffice (and libgsf that's part of the goffice stack), otherwise just the usual GTK+ 3 stack
Otherwise, the non-KDE/Qt scientific software I can think of does not use GTK+ at all, but, e.g.:
- Tcl/Tk: many electronics apps, xmaxima, …
- FLTK: xcas (not yet packaged in Fedora), …
So "G* libs" is the wrong answer for this topic.