From Fedora Project Wiki
m (internal link cleaning)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| image = [[File:Echo-testing-48px.png|link=QA/Test Days]]
| image = [[File:Echo-testing-48px.png|link=QA/Test Days]]
| caption = [[Workstation Graphical Upgrade]]
| caption = [[Workstation Graphical Upgrade]]
| date = 2016-06-16
| date = 2016-05-16
| time = all day
| time = all day
| website = [[QA/Test Days]]
| website = [[QA/Test Days]]
Line 16: Line 16:
Today's installment of Fedora Test Day will focus on '''upgrading from Fedora 23 to Fedora 24 Workstation with Gnome-software'''
Today's installment of Fedora Test Day will focus on '''upgrading from Fedora 23 to Fedora 24 Workstation with Gnome-software'''


== Who's available ==
== Who's available? ==


The following cast of characters will be available testing, workarounds, bug fixes, and general discussion ...
The following cast of characters will be available for testing, workarounds, bug fixes, and general discussion ...
* Development - [[User:hughsie|hughsie]] (hughsie), [[User:mclasen|mclasen]] (mclasen)
* Development - [[User:rhughes|Richard Hughes]] (hughsie), [[User:mclasen|Matthias Clasen]] (mclasen)
* Quality Assurance - [[User:Adamwill|Adam Williamson]] (adamw), [[User:pschindl|Petr Schindler]] (pschindl), [[User:Sumantrom|Sumantro Mukherjee]] (sumantro)
* Quality Assurance - [[User:pschindl|Petr Schindler]] (pschindl), [[User:Sumantrom|Sumantro Mukherjee]] (sumantro), [[User:kparal|Kamil Páral]] (kparal)


== Prerequisite for Test Day ==  
== Prerequisites for Test Day ==  


List of all prerequisite for the test event.
* A fully updated Fedora 23 Workstation installation, either on bare metal or in VM (please make sure you have no important data on that installation, things might go wrong -- don't do this on your production machine!)
 
* Enough free space on HDD
* A fully updated Fedora 23 Workstation installation, either on bare metal or in VM (please make sure you have no important data on that device, things might go wrong -- don't do this on your production machine)
* Free space on HD


== How to test? ==
== How to test? ==
# Make sure you are running Fedora 23 Workstation with a decent internet connection and root access.
# Enable COPR repo  run {{command|1=dnf copr enable rhughes/f23-gnome320}}
# fully update your machine and reboot
# Reboot and look for ''fedora.json'' which you will find {{command|1=~/.cache/gnome-software/3.20/upgrades/fedora.json}}
# Once inside search for ''f24'' change the corresponding key pair value from ''Under Development'' to ''Active''
#* 
  {
      "allow_retire": true,
      "branchname": "f24",
      "date_created": "2016-02-23 22:57:55",
      "date_updated": "2016-02-25 20:39:53",
      "dist_tag": ".fc24",
      "koji_name": "f24",
      "name": "Fedora",
      "status": "Active",
      "version": "24"
    }


You can start by following the test cases mention [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Workstation_Graphical_Upgrade here]
Follow the instructions from [[QA:Testcase_Workstation_Graphical_Upgrade]].


=== Run the tests ===
Furthermore, try to explore and test different approaches and/or edge cases (for example, what happens if you don't have enough free disk space?).


You can see [[QA:Testcase_Workstation_Graphical_Upgrade]] , execute the test case and and can post your results in the test day results page .
== Reporting bugs ==


== Reporting bugs ==
If you have problems with any of the tests, have a look at the list of reported bugs [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1308538&hide_resolved=1 in Bugzilla] and in the [http://testdays.fedorainfracloud.org/events/8 results page]. If you don't see it, please a new bug to [https://bugzilla.redhat.com Bugzilla], probably against <code>gnome-software</code> component. Add bug [[rhbug:1308538|1308538]] to the ''Blocks:'' field. If you are unsure about exactly how to file the report or what other information to include, just ask on IRC #fedora-test-day or #fedora-qa and we will help you.


Include some instructions on how to report bugs, and any special instructions.
== Test Results ==


If you have problems with any of the tests, report a bug to [https://bugzilla.redhat.com Bugzilla] u If you are unsure about exactly how to file the report or what other information to include, just ask on IRC #fedora-testday #fedora-qa and we will help you.
=== Tests ===
{|
! User
! Profile
! [[QA:Testcase_Workstation_Graphical_Upgrade|Testcase Workstation Graphical Upgrade]]
! References
|-
| [[User:Akashray|Akashray]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}<ref>Thanks Sumantro for mentoring</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Akshitlinux|Akshitlinux]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}<ref>Took more time than usual to update.
I was on 2 mb/s speed still downloading update stopped couple of times in between.</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:AmySt.|AmySt.]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Andrew|Andrew]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:AnilKul|AnilKul]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Anisha|Anisha]]
| Fedora 23 Mem 2GB oracle VBox
| {{result|pass}}<ref>Works</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Ankita|Ankita]]
| Fedora 23 on VM ware
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:BikramUTD|BikramUTD]]
| Fedora 23 on VM with 8GB RAM
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Buvaneshkumar|Buvanesh Kumar]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Gauravrootlove|Gauravrootlove]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}<ref>It took just too long , everything looks awesome. Kudos to Sumantro for the blog and detailed procedure.</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Graphikev|Graphikev]]
| VM VirtualBox (Fedora 23 Host) - Core i5 - 1GB RAM (VM)/4GB RAM (Host)
| {{result|fail}}<ref>Dialog window during download : Sorry, that didn't work.</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Jain Lavana|Jain Lavana]]
| Fedora 23 on VM manager with 2GB RAM and 20GB , 30mb/s network
| {{result|pass}}<ref>This was my first test day and I would like to know more about Fedora events.Thanks Sumantro Mukherjee for helping me out with his time and patience. </ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Ravi Sekhar|Ravi Sekhar]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Renault|Renault]]
| Fedora 23 on VirtualBox
| {{result|pass}}<ref>Very slow after downloading before ask to reboot.
Needs probably to display more info: download rate, number of packet, a percentage, the actual processing (downloading, preparing, installing, configuring)...</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Saket|Saket]]
| Fedora 23 on VM manager
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Sanket|Sanket]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:SreeparnaNK|SreeparnaNK]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}<ref>blog helped.</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:Vishal|Vishal]]
| Fedora 23 on Boxes
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:aernhart|aernhart]]
| F23 on Dell Inspiron 3520
| {{result|pass}}<ref>Only a minor thing: During the download, in the Software app, the Installed tab shows the word "Installing" whereas the Updates tab shows "Downloading Fedora 24". Maybe the Installed tab should also use the word "Downloading"? (But I like the progress bar along the button in the Installed tab.)


== Test Results ==
I think someone else mentioned that it would be nice to see more detailed progress info, just to comfort the user that the d/l didn't get silently stuck or hung.
Visit the [http://testdays.fedorainfracloud.org/events/8 result page] and click on the column title links to see the tests that need to be run: most column titles are links to a specific test case. Follow the instructions there, then enter your results by clicking the ''Enter result'' button for the test.


[[Category:Fedora 24 Test Days]]
Upon post-upgrade reboot, Gnome Notification center showed that OS was updated, clicking on it => List of installed updates.
</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:ankursinha|ankursinha]]
| http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
| {{result|warn}}<ref>{{bz|1335414}} The upgrade went fine. Initially, after enabling the copr, logging out and back in, gnome-software threw up a notification. On opening the app and clicking on "download", though, it threw an error - didn't give any details, though - looks like the bug that Kamil has filed already. I restarted and then it worked OK. The upgrade went OK - showed the percentage in the top left corner. Then it rebooted and everything seems OK now. The wiki page says it should notify the user about broken packages, but it didn't seem to tell me anything. I had vlc etc. from RPMFusion installed, and they're broken for F24 - they're not on the system any more, so I assume --allowerasing or something similar is enabled. The rest looks good - nothing broken, no real issues.</ref>{{result|pass}}<ref>The upgrade went fine. Initially, after enabling the copr, logging out and back in, gnome-software threw up a notification. On opening the app and clicking on "download", though, it threw an error - didn't give any details, though. I restarted and then it worked OK. The upgrade went OK - showed the percentage in the top left corner. Then it rebooted and everything seems OK now. The wiki page says it should notify the user about broken packages, but it didn't seem to tell me anything. I had vlc etc. from RPMFusion installed, and they're broken for F24 - they're not on the system any more, so I assume --allowerasing or something similar is enabled. The rest looks good - nothing broken, no real issues.</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:anubhav ranjan|anubhav ranjan]]
| Fedora 23 x86_x64
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:bhitier|bhitier]]
| fedora 23
| {{result|fail}}<ref>no ~/.cache/gnome-software/3.20/upgrades/fedora.json present on my pc after rebbot</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:coremodule|coremodule]]
| F23 to F24
| {{result|pass}}<ref>{{bz|1335458}} Very slow, but does work. Did not prompt for root password when upgrade was started.</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:desubham|desubham]]
| Fedora 23 workstn
| {{result|pass}}<ref>very helpful,I learn lot today</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:devonjspace-bugzilla|devonjspace-bugzilla]]
|
| {{result|pass}}<ref>Went well, no issues noted that was not already listed other than src was not connected at the start for the testing repo.  Not really a deal at all I think.</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:divyaU|divyaU]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:ffranz|ffranz]]
|
| {{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1335414}} We need more visual indication folks, both for the packages download in Software and also for packages installation after restarting. Apart that good job, looks promising!</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:frantisekz|frantisekz]]
| Fedora 23 (QEMU)
| {{result|warn}}<ref>{{bz|1336435}} </ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:harethz|harethz]]
| Fedora 23 Fedora 23 on virt manager with 3 GB RAM and 60GB .
| {{result|pass}}<ref>1- no issues 
2- It took just too long, 3 hours , everything work perfectly ,
3- quote "Needs probably to display more info: download rate, number of packet, a percentage, the actual processing (downloading, preparing, installing, configuring)... "
its my first time </ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:juliuxpigface|juliuxpigface]]
| Fedora 23 (Qemu-Kvm guest)
| {{result|warn}}<ref>{{bz|1335414}} {{bz|1336404}} </ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:kparal|kparal]]
|
| {{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1336530}} </ref>{{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1336459}} </ref>{{result|warn}}<ref>{{bz|1336404}} </ref>{{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1336400}} </ref>{{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1336383}} </ref>{{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1335458}} {{bz|1335463}} </ref>{{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1335414}} </ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:ksubrahm|ksubrahm]]
| Fedora23
| {{result|pass}}<ref>LGTM</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:me2|me2]]
| fedora 23
| {{result|warn}}<ref>{{bz|1336442}} </ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:modderj|modderj]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:patrikopravil|patrikopravil]]
| Fedora 23 HW
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:patrikopravil|patrikopravil]]
| Fedora 23 Virtual Box
| {{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1335414}} {{bz|}} 1.  #1335414 Broke packages and didnt noticed me.</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:pnemade|pnemade]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}<ref>{{bz|1335414}} {{bz|1336442}} {{bz|1336477}} {{bz|1336482}} </ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:prakashmishra1598|prakashmishra1598]]
| fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:pschindl|pschindl]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1336436}} </ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:rahuldecoded|rahuldecoded]]
| Fedora23. Vmware(2 GBRAM) and Host(4GB RAM)
| {{result|pass}}<ref>With using this blog http://sumantrom.blogspot.in/2016/05/workstation-graphical-upgrade-from.html . It became a calkwalk for me. :)</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:ronw|ronw]]
| Virtualbox VM 5.0.20 (Arch Linux host)
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:rootmenow|rootmenow]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}<ref>Slow but works good</ref>
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:satellit|satellit]]
| NUC i5 16 gb memory (QEMU/kvm 30 GB 2048) used http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/F23-x86_64-WORK-20160512.iso
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:sumantrom|sumantrom]]
| Fedora 23
| {{result|pass}}
| <references/>
|-
| [[User:xenonese|xenonese]]
| Fedora 23 x68 x64 workstation on boxes
| {{result|pass}}<ref>Very slow but nothing seems broken. "Learn more" button works too.</ref>
| <references/>


|-
|}


<!-- remove this category when creating a test day page -->
[[Category:Fedora 24 Test Days]]
[[Category:QA Templates]]

Latest revision as of 21:45, 19 September 2016

Fedora Test Day
Workstation Graphical Upgrade
Date 2016-05-16
Time all day
Website QA/Test Days
IRC #fedora-test-day (webirc)
Mailing list test


Can't make the date?
If you come to this page before or after the test day is completed, your testing is still valuable, and you can use the information on this page to test, file any bugs you find at Bugzilla, and add your results to the results section. If this page is more than a month old when you arrive here, please check the current schedule and see if a similar but more recent Test Day is planned or has already happened.

What to test?[edit]

Today's installment of Fedora Test Day will focus on upgrading from Fedora 23 to Fedora 24 Workstation with Gnome-software

Who's available?[edit]

The following cast of characters will be available for testing, workarounds, bug fixes, and general discussion ...

Prerequisites for Test Day[edit]

  • A fully updated Fedora 23 Workstation installation, either on bare metal or in VM (please make sure you have no important data on that installation, things might go wrong -- don't do this on your production machine!)
  • Enough free space on HDD

How to test?[edit]

Follow the instructions from QA:Testcase_Workstation_Graphical_Upgrade.

Furthermore, try to explore and test different approaches and/or edge cases (for example, what happens if you don't have enough free disk space?).

Reporting bugs[edit]

If you have problems with any of the tests, have a look at the list of reported bugs in Bugzilla and in the results page. If you don't see it, please a new bug to Bugzilla, probably against gnome-software component. Add bug 1308538 to the Blocks: field. If you are unsure about exactly how to file the report or what other information to include, just ask on IRC #fedora-test-day or #fedora-qa and we will help you.

Test Results[edit]

Tests[edit]

User Profile Testcase Workstation Graphical Upgrade References
Akashray Fedora 23
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ Thanks Sumantro for mentoring
Akshitlinux Fedora 23
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ Took more time than usual to update. I was on 2 mb/s speed still downloading update stopped couple of times in between.
AmySt. Fedora 23
Pass pass
Andrew Fedora 23
Pass pass
AnilKul Fedora 23
Pass pass
Anisha Fedora 23 Mem 2GB oracle VBox
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ Works
Ankita Fedora 23 on VM ware
Pass pass
BikramUTD Fedora 23 on VM with 8GB RAM
Pass pass
Buvanesh Kumar Fedora 23
Pass pass
Gauravrootlove Fedora 23
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ It took just too long , everything looks awesome. Kudos to Sumantro for the blog and detailed procedure.
Graphikev VM VirtualBox (Fedora 23 Host) - Core i5 - 1GB RAM (VM)/4GB RAM (Host)
Fail fail
[1]
  1. ↑ Dialog window during download : Sorry, that didn't work.
Jain Lavana Fedora 23 on VM manager with 2GB RAM and 20GB , 30mb/s network
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ This was my first test day and I would like to know more about Fedora events.Thanks Sumantro Mukherjee for helping me out with his time and patience.
Ravi Sekhar Fedora 23
Pass pass
Renault Fedora 23 on VirtualBox
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ Very slow after downloading before ask to reboot. Needs probably to display more info: download rate, number of packet, a percentage, the actual processing (downloading, preparing, installing, configuring)...
Saket Fedora 23 on VM manager
Pass pass
Sanket Fedora 23
Pass pass
SreeparnaNK Fedora 23
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ blog helped.
Vishal Fedora 23 on Boxes
Pass pass
aernhart F23 on Dell Inspiron 3520
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ Only a minor thing: During the download, in the Software app, the Installed tab shows the word "Installing" whereas the Updates tab shows "Downloading Fedora 24". Maybe the Installed tab should also use the word "Downloading"? (But I like the progress bar along the button in the Installed tab.) I think someone else mentioned that it would be nice to see more detailed progress info, just to comfort the user that the d/l didn't get silently stuck or hung. Upon post-upgrade reboot, Gnome Notification center showed that OS was updated, clicking on it => List of installed updates.
ankursinha http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Warning warn
[1]
Pass pass
[2]
  1. ↑ RHBZ #1335414 The upgrade went fine. Initially, after enabling the copr, logging out and back in, gnome-software threw up a notification. On opening the app and clicking on "download", though, it threw an error - didn't give any details, though - looks like the bug that Kamil has filed already. I restarted and then it worked OK. The upgrade went OK - showed the percentage in the top left corner. Then it rebooted and everything seems OK now. The wiki page says it should notify the user about broken packages, but it didn't seem to tell me anything. I had vlc etc. from RPMFusion installed, and they're broken for F24 - they're not on the system any more, so I assume --allowerasing or something similar is enabled. The rest looks good - nothing broken, no real issues.
  2. ↑ The upgrade went fine. Initially, after enabling the copr, logging out and back in, gnome-software threw up a notification. On opening the app and clicking on "download", though, it threw an error - didn't give any details, though. I restarted and then it worked OK. The upgrade went OK - showed the percentage in the top left corner. Then it rebooted and everything seems OK now. The wiki page says it should notify the user about broken packages, but it didn't seem to tell me anything. I had vlc etc. from RPMFusion installed, and they're broken for F24 - they're not on the system any more, so I assume --allowerasing or something similar is enabled. The rest looks good - nothing broken, no real issues.
anubhav ranjan Fedora 23 x86_x64
Pass pass
bhitier fedora 23
Fail fail
[1]
  1. ↑ no ~/.cache/gnome-software/3.20/upgrades/fedora.json present on my pc after rebbot
coremodule F23 to F24
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ RHBZ #1335458 Very slow, but does work. Did not prompt for root password when upgrade was started.
desubham Fedora 23 workstn
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ very helpful,I learn lot today
devonjspace-bugzilla
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ Went well, no issues noted that was not already listed other than src was not connected at the start for the testing repo. Not really a deal at all I think.
divyaU Fedora 23
Pass pass
ffranz
Fail fail
[1]
  1. ↑ RHBZ #1335414 We need more visual indication folks, both for the packages download in Software and also for packages installation after restarting. Apart that good job, looks promising!
frantisekz Fedora 23 (QEMU)
Warning warn
[1]
  1. ↑ RHBZ #1336435
harethz Fedora 23 Fedora 23 on virt manager with 3 GB RAM and 60GB .
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ 1- no issues 2- It took just too long, 3 hours , everything work perfectly , 3- quote "Needs probably to display more info: download rate, number of packet, a percentage, the actual processing (downloading, preparing, installing, configuring)... " its my first time
juliuxpigface Fedora 23 (Qemu-Kvm guest)
Warning warn
[1]
  1. ↑ RHBZ #1335414 RHBZ #1336404
kparal
Fail fail
[1]
Fail fail
[2]
Warning warn
[3]
Fail fail
[4]
Fail fail
[5]
Fail fail
[6]
Fail fail
[7]
  1. ↑ RHBZ #1336530
  2. ↑ RHBZ #1336459
  3. ↑ RHBZ #1336404
  4. ↑ RHBZ #1336400
  5. ↑ RHBZ #1336383
  6. ↑ RHBZ #1335458 RHBZ #1335463
  7. ↑ RHBZ #1335414
ksubrahm Fedora23
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ LGTM
me2 fedora 23
Warning warn
[1]
  1. ↑ RHBZ #1336442
modderj Fedora 23
Pass pass
patrikopravil Fedora 23 HW
Pass pass
patrikopravil Fedora 23 Virtual Box
Fail fail
[1]
  1. ↑ RHBZ #1335414 RHBZ #[[rhbug:|]] 1. #1335414 Broke packages and didnt noticed me.
pnemade Fedora 23
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ RHBZ #1335414 RHBZ #1336442 RHBZ #1336477 RHBZ #1336482
prakashmishra1598 fedora 23
Pass pass
pschindl Fedora 23
Fail fail
[1]
  1. ↑ RHBZ #1336436
rahuldecoded Fedora23. Vmware(2 GBRAM) and Host(4GB RAM)
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ With using this blog http://sumantrom.blogspot.in/2016/05/workstation-graphical-upgrade-from.html . It became a calkwalk for me. :)
ronw Virtualbox VM 5.0.20 (Arch Linux host)
Pass pass
rootmenow Fedora 23
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ Slow but works good
satellit NUC i5 16 gb memory (QEMU/kvm 30 GB 2048) used http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/F23-x86_64-WORK-20160512.iso
Pass pass
sumantrom Fedora 23
Pass pass
xenonese Fedora 23 x68 x64 workstation on boxes
Pass pass
[1]
  1. ↑ Very slow but nothing seems broken. "Learn more" button works too.
Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Test_Day:2016-05-16_Workstation_Graphical_Upgrade&oldid=474242"