From Fedora Project Wiki
(Move Ansible info into this page, now that it's chosen.)
("test runner" "test environment")
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Standard Discovery, Packaging, Invocation of Integration Tests =
= Standard Discovery, Staging and Invocation of Integration Tests =


== Summary ==
== Summary ==


Lets define a clear delineation of between a ''test suite'' (including framework) and the CI system that is running the test suite. This is the standard interface.
Let's define a clear delineation of between a ''test suite'' (including framework) and the CI system that is running the test suite. This is the standard interface.


[[File:Invoking-tests-standard-interface.png|800px]]
[[File:Invoking-tests-standard-interface.png|800px]]
Line 9: Line 9:
What follows is a standard way to discover, package and invoke integration tests for a package stored in a Fedora dist-git repo.
What follows is a standard way to discover, package and invoke integration tests for a package stored in a Fedora dist-git repo.


Many Fedora packages have unit tests. These tests are typically run during a <code>%check</code> RPM build step and run in a build root. On the other hand, integration testing should happen against a composed system. Upstream projects have integration tests, both Fedora QA and the Atomic Host team would like to create more integration tests, Red Hat would like to bring integration tests upstream.  
Many Fedora packages have unit tests. These tests are typically run during a <code>%check</code> RPM build step and run in a build root. On the other hand, integration testing should happen against a composed system. Upstream projects have integration tests, both Fedora QA and the Atomic Host team would like to create more integration tests, Red Hat would like to bring integration tests upstream.


== Owner ==
== Owner ==
Line 18: Line 18:
* Name: [[User:pingou|Pierre-Yves Chibon]]
* Name: [[User:pingou|Pierre-Yves Chibon]]
* Email: pingou@fedoraproject.org
* Email: pingou@fedoraproject.org
* Name: [[User:astepano|Andrei Stepanov]]
* Name: [[User:sturivny|Serhii Turivnyi]]
* Email: sturivny@fedoraproject.org


== Terminology ==
== Terminology ==
Line 24: Line 29:
** Examples: RPMs, OCI image, ISO, QCow2, Module repository ...
** Examples: RPMs, OCI image, ISO, QCow2, Module repository ...
* '''Test''': A callable/runnable piece of code and corresponding test data and mocks which exercises and evaluates a ''test subject''.
* '''Test''': A callable/runnable piece of code and corresponding test data and mocks which exercises and evaluates a ''test subject''.
** '''Test environment''': environment where actual test run takes place. Test has direct impact on test environment.
* '''Test Suite''': The collection of all tests that apply to a ''test subject''.  
* '''Test Suite''': The collection of all tests that apply to a ''test subject''.  
* '''Test Framework''': A library or component that the ''test suite'' and ''tests'' use to accomplish their job.
* '''Test Framework''': A library or component that the ''test suite'' and ''tests'' use to accomplish their job.
** Examples: [https://avocado-framework.github.io/ Avocado], [https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests GNOME Installed Tests], [https://pagure.io/modularity-testing-framework/ Modularity Testing Framework], [https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-host-tests Ansible tests in Atomic Host], [https://tunir.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Tunir tests], docker test images, ...
** Examples: [https://avocado-framework.github.io/ Avocado], [https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests GNOME Installed Tests], [https://github.com/fedora-modularity/meta-test-family/ Meta Test Family], [https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-host-tests Ansible tests in Atomic Host], [https://tunir.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Tunir tests], docker test images, ...
* '''Test Result''': A boolean pass/fail output of a ''test suite''.  
* '''Test Result''': A boolean pass/fail output of a ''test suite''.  
** ''Test results'' are for consumption by automated aspects of a ''testing systems''.
** ''Test results'' are for consumption by automated aspects of a ''testing systems''.
Line 32: Line 38:
** ''Test artifacts'' are for consumption by humans, archival or big data analysis.
** ''Test artifacts'' are for consumption by humans, archival or big data analysis.
* '''Testing System''': A CI or other ''testing system'' that would like to discover, stage and invoke tests for a ''test subject''.
* '''Testing System''': A CI or other ''testing system'' that would like to discover, stage and invoke tests for a ''test subject''.
** Examples: [https://jenkins.io/ Jenkins], [https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/ Taskotron], [https://docs.openstack.org/infra/zuul/ ZUUL], [https://ci.centos.org/ CentOS CI], Red Hat CI, [https://travis-ci.org/ Travis], [https://semaphoreci.com/ Semaphore], [https://developers.openshift.com/managing-your-applications/continuous-integration.html Openshift CI/CD], [https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration/AutopkgtestInfrastructure Ubuntu CI], ...
** Examples: [https://jenkins.io/ Jenkins], [https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/ Taskotron], [https://docs.openstack.org/infra/zuul/ ZUUL], [https://ci.centos.org/ CentOS CI], [https://github.com/projectatomic/papr Papr], [https://travis-ci.org/ Travis], [https://semaphoreci.com/ Semaphore], [https://developers.openshift.com/managing-your-applications/continuous-integration.html Openshift CI/CD], [https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration/AutopkgtestInfrastructure Ubuntu CI], ...
** Testing system uses '''test runner''' as a place for running tests. Testing system delegates test-running to test runner. Test runner examples: local machine, VM, ...


== Responsibilities ==
== Responsibilities ==


The '''testing system''' is responsible to:
The '''testing system''' is responsible to:
* Build or otherwise acquire the ''test subject'', such as package, container image, tree …
* Build or otherwise acquire the ''test subject'', such as a package, container image, tree …
* Decide which ''test suite'' to run, often by using the standard interface to discover appropriate ''tests'' for the dist-git repo that a test subject originated in.
* Decide which ''test suite'' to run, often by using the standard interface to discover appropriate ''tests'' for the dist-git repo that a test subject originated in.
* Schedule, provision or orchestrate a job to run the ''test suite'' on appropriate compute, storage, ...
* Schedule, provision or orchestrate a job to run the ''test suite'' on appropriate compute, storage, ...
Line 64: Line 71:


* The ''test suite'' and ''test framework'' SHOULD NOT leak its implementation details into the testing system, other than via the ''standard interface''.
* The ''test suite'' and ''test framework'' SHOULD NOT leak its implementation details into the testing system, other than via the ''standard interface''.
* The ''test suite'' and ''test framework'' SHOULD NOT rely on behavior of the testing system other than the ''standard interface''.
* The ''test suite'' and ''test framework'' SHOULD NOT rely on the behavior of the testing system other than the ''standard interface''.
* The ''standard interface'' MUST enable a dist-git packager to run a ''test suite'' locally.
* The ''standard interface'' MUST enable a dist-git packager to run a ''test suite'' locally.
** ''Test suites'' or ''test frameworks'' MAY call out to the network for certain tasks.
** ''Test suites'' or ''test frameworks'' MAY call out to the network for certain tasks.
Line 72: Line 79:
** For ''outside-in tests'' the ''test suite'' is outside of the file system tree and process space of the ''test subject''.
** For ''outside-in tests'' the ''test suite'' is outside of the file system tree and process space of the ''test subject''.
* The ''test suite'' and ''test framework'' SHOULD be able to provision containers and virtual machines necessary for its testing without requesting them from the ''testing system''.
* The ''test suite'' and ''test framework'' SHOULD be able to provision containers and virtual machines necessary for its testing without requesting them from the ''testing system''.
* The ''standard interface'' SHOULD describe how to uniquely identify a ''test suite'',  
* The ''standard interface'' SHOULD describe how to uniquely identify a ''test suite'',


== Benefit to Fedora ==
== Benefit to Fedora ==
Line 84: Line 91:
This standard interface describes how to discover, stage and invoke tests. It is important to cleanly separate implementation details of the ''testing system'' from the ''test suite'' and its framework. It is also important to allow Fedora packagers to locally and manually invoke a ''test suite''.
This standard interface describes how to discover, stage and invoke tests. It is important to cleanly separate implementation details of the ''testing system'' from the ''test suite'' and its framework. It is also important to allow Fedora packagers to locally and manually invoke a ''test suite''.


'''First see the [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InvokingTests#Terminology Terminogy] division of [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InvokingTests#Terminology Responsibilities] and [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InvokingTests#Requirements Requirements]'''
'''First see the [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InvokingTests#Terminology Terminogy] division of [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InvokingTests#Responsibilities Responsibilities] and [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/InvokingTests#Requirements Requirements]'''


=== Staging ===
=== Staging ===
Line 90: Line 97:
Tests files will be added into the <code>tests/</code> folder of a dist-git repository branch. The structure of the files and folders is left to the liberty of the packagers but there are one or more playbooks in the <code>tests/</code> folder that can be invoked to run the test suites.
Tests files will be added into the <code>tests/</code> folder of a dist-git repository branch. The structure of the files and folders is left to the liberty of the packagers but there are one or more playbooks in the <code>tests/</code> folder that can be invoked to run the test suites.


# The ''testing system'' SHOULD stage the tests on Fedora operating system appropriate for the branch name of the dist-git repository containing the tests.
# The ''testing system'' SHOULD stage the tests on target (eg: Fedora) operating system appropriate for the branch name of the dist-git repository containing the tests.
# The ''testing system'' SHOULD stage a clean a system for each set of tests it runs.
# The ''testing system'' SHOULD stage a clean a system for each set of tests it runs.
# The ''testing system'' MUST stage the following packages:
# The ''testing system'' MUST stage the following packages:
## <code>ansible python2-dnf libselinux-python</code>
## <code>ansible python2-dnf libselinux-python standard-test-roles</code>
# The ''testing system'' MUST clone the dist-git repository for the test, and checks out the appropriate branch.
# The ''testing system'' MUST clone the dist-git repository for the test, and checks out the appropriate branch.
# The contents of <code>/etc/yum.repos.d</code> on the staged system SHOULD be replaced with repository information that reflects the known good Fedora packages corresponding to the branch of the dist-git repository.
# The contents of <code>/etc/yum.repos.d</code> on the staged system SHOULD be replaced with repository information that reflects the known good Fedora packages corresponding to the branch of the dist-git repository.
Line 100: Line 107:
=== Invocation ===
=== Invocation ===


The ''testing system'' MUST select a playbooks in the <code>tests/</code> folder depending on the type of ''test subject'' it would like to test. The filename of each of these playbooks start with the <code>test_</code> prefix and ends with a <code>.yml</code> extension. The following well known playbooks correspond to common ''test subjects''. Additional playbooks will be added to this list as additional ''test subjects'' become common:
The testing system MUST run each playbook matching the glob <code>tests/tests*.yml</code> in the dist-git repo. Each of these files constitutes a
test suite. Each test suite is invoked independently by the testing system as follows.
 
The ''test subjects'' are passed to the playbook and inventory as operating system environment and ansible environment. Often only one ''test subject'' is passed in. However multiple subjects may be concatenated together in a shell escaped string. The playbooks and/or inventory script split the string. The extensions as follows are used to determine the type of subject:


{|
{|
! Playbook invoked !! Test subject
! Identifier !! Test subject
|-
| *.rpm    || Absolute path to an RPM file
|-
|-
| test_rpm.yml    || A string containing a space separated list of rpm filenames
| *.repo    || Absolute repo filenames appropriate for <code>/etc/yum.repos.d</code>
|-
|-
| test_repo.yml    || A string containing a space separated list of repo filenames appropriate for <code>/etc/yum.repos.d</code>
| *.qcow2, *.qcow2c || Absolute path to one virtual machine disk image bootable with cloud-init
|-
|-
| test_cloud.yml  || A string containing the filename of one virtual machine disk image bootable with cloud-init
| *.oci    || Absolute path of one OCI container image filesystem bundle
|-
|-
| test_oci.yml || A string containing the filename of one OCI container image filesystem bundle
| docker:*  || Fully qualified path to a docker image in a registry
|-
|-
| test_local.yml  || An empty string. No test subject or installation.
| ...      || Other ''test subject'' identifiers may be added later.
|}
|}


If a playbook for a given ''test subject'' is not present in a dist-git repository, the ''testing system'' SHOULD treat the test as having been "skipped". That is, the invocation SHOULD neither pass nor fail.


The <code>test_local.yml</code> SHOULD test a booted system where the test suite, its framework, and test subject are already installed. This playbook is usually invoked by the other playbooks. Additional playbooks may be present in the <code>tests/</code> folder, and these MAY represent multiple test suites. The testing system is not expected to be aware of these additional playbooks.
Various ''tests'' in a playbook constitute a ''test suite''. Some parts of these ''test suites'' will run in certain contexts, against certain deliverable artifacts. Certain tests will run against Atomic Host deliverables, while others will not. Certain tests will run against Docker deliverables while others will not. This is related to, but does not exactly overlap with the ''test subject'' identifiers above. Ansible tags are used to denote these contexts.
 
{|
! Tag      !! Test context
|-
| atomic    || Atomic Host
|-
| container || A Docker or OCI container
|-
| classic  || Tested against a classic installed YUM/DNF installed system.
|-
| ...      || Other ''test subject'' identifiers may be added later.
|}
 


To invoke the selected playbook, the ''testing system'':
To invoke the tests, the ''testing system'' must perform the following tasks for each ''test suite'' playbook:


# MUST execute the playbook locally with <code>ansible_connection=local</code> and host <code>localhost</code>
# MUST execute the playbook with the following operating system environment variables:
# MUST execute the playbook with the following variables.
## <code>TEST_SUBJECTS</code>: The ''test subjects'' string as described above
## <code>TEST_ARTIFACTS</code>: The full path of an empty folder for ''test artifacts''
# MUST execute the playbook with the following Ansible variables.
## <code>subjects</code>: The ''test subjects'' string as described above
## <code>subjects</code>: The ''test subjects'' string as described above
## <code>artifacts</code>: The full path of an empty folder for ''test artifacts''
## <code>artifacts</code>: The full path of an empty folder for ''test artifacts''
# SHOULD execute the playbook with all Ansible tags best represent the intended ''test context''.
## The choice of ''test context'' tags is related to the ''test subject'' being tested
# MUST execute Ansible with inventory set to the full path of the file or directory <code>tests/inventory</code> if it exists.
## If the <code>tests/inventory</code> file doesn't exist, then the following inventory SHOULD be used as a default:<br> <code>/usr/share/ansible/inventory</code>
# MUST execute the playbook as root.
# MUST execute the playbook as root.
# MUST examine the exit code of the playbook. A zero exit code is successful ''test result'', non-zero is failure.
# MUST examine the exit code of the playbook. A zero exit code is successful ''test result'', non-zero is failure.
Line 132: Line 162:
# SHOULD treat the contents of the <code>artifacts</code> folder as the ''test artifacts''.
# SHOULD treat the contents of the <code>artifacts</code> folder as the ''test artifacts''.


The playbook and its ''test suite'' or ''test framework'':
Each ''test suite'' playbook or ''test framework'' contained therein:


# SHOULD drop privileges appropriately if the ''test suite'' should be run as non-root.
# SHOULD drop privileges appropriately if the ''test suite'' should be run as non-root.
Line 139: Line 169:
# MUST place the main readable output of the ''test suite'' into a <code>test.log</code> file in the <code>artifacts</code> variable folder. This MUST happen even if some of the test suites fail.
# MUST place the main readable output of the ''test suite'' into a <code>test.log</code> file in the <code>artifacts</code> variable folder. This MUST happen even if some of the test suites fail.
# SHOULD place additional ''test artifacts'' in the folder defined in the <code>artifacts</code> variable.
# SHOULD place additional ''test artifacts'' in the folder defined in the <code>artifacts</code> variable.
# MUST return a zero exit code of the playbook if the ''test result'' is a pass, or a non-zero exit code if the ''test result'' is a fail.


=== Discovery ===
If an inventory file or script exists, it:


A testing system needs to be able to efficiently answer the question "does this subject have any tests packages, and if so, what are their names". This should be automatically discoverable to the extent possible.
# MUST describe where to invoke the playbook and how to connect to that target.
# SHOULD launch or install any supported <code>$TEST_SUBJECTS</code> so that the playbook can be invoked against them.
# SHOULD put relevant logs in the <code>$TEST_ARTIFACTS</code> directory.


Use repoquery, basically I propose we rely on the dependency chain of the
=== Discovery ===
RPMs itself instead of trying to replicate it differently.


repoquery --whatrequires or an equivalent relying on mdapi:
Test discovery is done via dist-git. Both packages and modules may have tests in this format. To list which ''test context'' a given dist-git directory or playbook is relevant for, use a command like the following:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/mdapi/ (which I need to adjust to support
back walking (ie find which packages requires "foo" instead of what packages
"foo" requires which we currently have)
and we should be able to build a list of dependencies.


In addition, a ''test suite'' can be uniquely identified using the git hash of the commit of the git repo.
<pre>
# ansible-playbook --list-tags tests.yml
</pre>


== Scope ==
== Scope ==
Line 173: Line 203:
There are no real upgrade or compatibility impact. The tests will be branched per release as spec files are branched dist-git is now.
There are no real upgrade or compatibility impact. The tests will be branched per release as spec files are branched dist-git is now.


== Documentation ==


== Examples ==
* [[CI|CI Landing page]]
 
* [[CI/Tests|Documentation page]]
What follows are examples of writing and/or packaging existing tests to this standard. This is how to run the various examples:
 
 
* <code>test_rpm.yml</code>
  $ fedpkg local
  $ mkdir -p ./artifacts
  $ sudo ansible-playbook tests/test_rpm.yml -e artifacts=$PWD/artifacts -e subjects=$PWD/x86_64/sed-4*.x86_64.rpm
 
* <code>test_local.yml</code>
  $ mkdir -p ./artifacts
  $ sudo ansible-playbook tests/test_local.yml -e artifacts=$PWD/artifacts -e subjects=
 
* <code>test_cloud.yml</code>
  $ mkdir -p ./artifacts
  $ curl -o cloud.qcow2 https://s3.amazonaws.com/fedora-atomic-s3/Fedora-26-20170331.n.0/Fedora-Atomic-26-20170331.n.0.x86_64.qcow2
  $ sudo ansible-playbook tests/test_cloud.yml -e artifacts=$PWD/artifacts -e subjects=$PWD/cloud.qcow2
 
* <code>test_oci.yml</code>
** No examples here yet
 
* <code>test_repo.yml</code>
  $ mkdir -p ./artifacts
  ... get a repo file ...
  $ sudo ansible-playbook tests/test_repo.yml -e artifacts=$PWD/artifacts -e subjects=$PWD/haproxy.repo
 
=== Example: Simple in-situ test ===
 
Copy of Debian 'gzip' test:
 
* Package: '''gzip'''
* dist-git: https://github.com/stefwalter/gzip-dist-git/commits/ansible-test
* Reference: https://patches.ubuntu.com/g/gzip/
 
=== Example: GNOME style "Installed Tests" ===
 
Upstream glib2-tests being executed according to this standard interface:
 
* Package: '''glib2'''
* dist-git repo: https://github.com/stefwalter/glib2-dist-git/tree/ansible-test
* Reference: https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests
 
=== Example: Tests run in Docker Container ===
 
'''WARNING''': Not yet migrated to above spec changes.
 
An integration test running tests in a docker container can be found at: https://pagure.io/ansible_based_tests/blob/master/f/tests/glib2
full example structure: https://pagure.io/ansible_based_tests/blob/master/f/tests/glib2/playbooks
 
=== Example: Modularity testing Framework ===
 
Module testing framework tests wrapped in this standard interface:
 
* Module: '''haproxy'''
* dist-git repo: https://github.com/stefwalter/haproxy-dist-git/tree/ansible-test
* Example repo file:
 
  [haproxy-repo-test-subject]
  name=Example haproxy repo test subject
  baseurl=http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/module-8e83a5f6f6ed55ca/latest/x86_64/
  gpgcheck=0
  enabled=1
 
=== Example: Ansible with Atomic Host ===
 
'''TODO:''' Port [https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-host-tests an existing test]
 
=== Example: Beakerlib based test ===
 
Beakerlib tests of sed package:
 
* Package: '''sed'''
* dist-git: https://github.com/stefwalter/sed-dist-git/commits/ansible-test
* Reference: Ported upstream
 
Beakerlib test of 'setup' package:
 
* Package: '''setup'''
* dist-git: https://github.com/stefwalter/setup-dist-git/commits/ansible-test
* Reference: https://www.mankier.com/1/beakerlib#Examples
 
Beakerlib test of 'coreutils' package:
 
* Package: '''coreutils'''
* dist-git: https://github.com/stefwalter/coreutils-dist-git/commits/ansible-test
* Reference: https://www.mankier.com/1/beakerlib#Examples
 


== Proposals and Evaluation ==
== Proposals and Evaluation ==

Latest revision as of 16:20, 30 January 2018

Standard Discovery, Staging and Invocation of Integration Tests

Summary

Let's define a clear delineation of between a test suite (including framework) and the CI system that is running the test suite. This is the standard interface.

What follows is a standard way to discover, package and invoke integration tests for a package stored in a Fedora dist-git repo.

Many Fedora packages have unit tests. These tests are typically run during a %check RPM build step and run in a build root. On the other hand, integration testing should happen against a composed system. Upstream projects have integration tests, both Fedora QA and the Atomic Host team would like to create more integration tests, Red Hat would like to bring integration tests upstream.

Owner

Terminology

  • Test Subject: The items that are to be tested.
    • Examples: RPMs, OCI image, ISO, QCow2, Module repository ...
  • Test: A callable/runnable piece of code and corresponding test data and mocks which exercises and evaluates a test subject.
    • Test environment: environment where actual test run takes place. Test has direct impact on test environment.
  • Test Suite: The collection of all tests that apply to a test subject.
  • Test Framework: A library or component that the test suite and tests use to accomplish their job.
  • Test Result: A boolean pass/fail output of a test suite.
    • Test results are for consumption by automated aspects of a testing systems.
  • Test Artifact: Any additional output of the test suite such as the stdout/stderr output, log files, screenshots, core dumps, or TAP/Junit/subunit streams.
    • Test artifacts are for consumption by humans, archival or big data analysis.
  • Testing System: A CI or other testing system that would like to discover, stage and invoke tests for a test subject.

Responsibilities

The testing system is responsible to:

  • Build or otherwise acquire the test subject, such as a package, container image, tree …
  • Decide which test suite to run, often by using the standard interface to discover appropriate tests for the dist-git repo that a test subject originated in.
  • Schedule, provision or orchestrate a job to run the test suite on appropriate compute, storage, ...
  • Stage the test suite as described by the standard interface.
  • Invoke the test suite as described by the standard interface.
  • Gather the test results and test artifacts as described by the standard interface.
  • Announce and relay the test results and test artifacts for gating, archival ...

The standard interface describes how to:

  • Discover a test suite for a given dist-git repo.
  • Uniquely identify a test suite.
  • Stage a test suite and its dependencies such as test frameworks.
  • Provide the test subject to the test suite.
  • Invoke a test suite in a consistent way.
  • Gather test results and test artifacts from the invoked test suite.

The test suite is responsible to:

  • Declare its dependencies such as a test framework via the standard interface.
  • Execute the test framework as necessary.
  • Provision (usually locally) any containers or virtual machines necessary for testing the test subject.
  • Provide test results and test subjects back according to the standard

The format of the textual logs and test artifacts that come out of a test suite is not prescribed by this document. Nor is it envisioned to be standardized across all possible test suites.

Requirements

  • The test suite and test framework SHOULD NOT leak its implementation details into the testing system, other than via the standard interface.
  • The test suite and test framework SHOULD NOT rely on the behavior of the testing system other than the standard interface.
  • The standard interface MUST enable a dist-git packager to run a test suite locally.
    • Test suites or test frameworks MAY call out to the network for certain tasks.
  • It MUST be possible to stage an upstream test suite using the standard interface.
  • Both in-situ tests, and more rigorous outside-in tests MUST be possible with the standard interface.
    • For in-situ tests the test suite is in the same file system tree and process space as the test subject.
    • For outside-in tests the test suite is outside of the file system tree and process space of the test subject.
  • The test suite and test framework SHOULD be able to provision containers and virtual machines necessary for its testing without requesting them from the testing system.
  • The standard interface SHOULD describe how to uniquely identify a test suite,

Benefit to Fedora

Developers benefit by having a consistent target for how to describe tests, while also being able to execute them locally while debugging issues or iterating on tests.

By staging and invoking tests consistently in Fedora we create an eco-system for the tests that allows varied test frameworks as well as CI system infrastructure to interoperate. The integration tests outlast the implementation details of either the frameworks they're written in or the CI systems running them.

Detailed Description

This standard interface describes how to discover, stage and invoke tests. It is important to cleanly separate implementation details of the testing system from the test suite and its framework. It is also important to allow Fedora packagers to locally and manually invoke a test suite.

First see the Terminogy division of Responsibilities and Requirements

Staging

Tests files will be added into the tests/ folder of a dist-git repository branch. The structure of the files and folders is left to the liberty of the packagers but there are one or more playbooks in the tests/ folder that can be invoked to run the test suites.

  1. The testing system SHOULD stage the tests on target (eg: Fedora) operating system appropriate for the branch name of the dist-git repository containing the tests.
  2. The testing system SHOULD stage a clean a system for each set of tests it runs.
  3. The testing system MUST stage the following packages:
    1. ansible python2-dnf libselinux-python standard-test-roles
  4. The testing system MUST clone the dist-git repository for the test, and checks out the appropriate branch.
  5. The contents of /etc/yum.repos.d on the staged system SHOULD be replaced with repository information that reflects the known good Fedora packages corresponding to the branch of the dist-git repository.
    1. The testing system MAY use multiple repositories, including updates or updates-testing to ensure this.

Invocation

The testing system MUST run each playbook matching the glob tests/tests*.yml in the dist-git repo. Each of these files constitutes a test suite. Each test suite is invoked independently by the testing system as follows.

The test subjects are passed to the playbook and inventory as operating system environment and ansible environment. Often only one test subject is passed in. However multiple subjects may be concatenated together in a shell escaped string. The playbooks and/or inventory script split the string. The extensions as follows are used to determine the type of subject:

Identifier Test subject
*.rpm Absolute path to an RPM file
*.repo Absolute repo filenames appropriate for /etc/yum.repos.d
*.qcow2, *.qcow2c Absolute path to one virtual machine disk image bootable with cloud-init
*.oci Absolute path of one OCI container image filesystem bundle
docker:* Fully qualified path to a docker image in a registry
... Other test subject identifiers may be added later.


Various tests in a playbook constitute a test suite. Some parts of these test suites will run in certain contexts, against certain deliverable artifacts. Certain tests will run against Atomic Host deliverables, while others will not. Certain tests will run against Docker deliverables while others will not. This is related to, but does not exactly overlap with the test subject identifiers above. Ansible tags are used to denote these contexts.

Tag Test context
atomic Atomic Host
container A Docker or OCI container
classic Tested against a classic installed YUM/DNF installed system.
... Other test subject identifiers may be added later.


To invoke the tests, the testing system must perform the following tasks for each test suite playbook:

  1. MUST execute the playbook with the following operating system environment variables:
    1. TEST_SUBJECTS: The test subjects string as described above
    2. TEST_ARTIFACTS: The full path of an empty folder for test artifacts
  2. MUST execute the playbook with the following Ansible variables.
    1. subjects: The test subjects string as described above
    2. artifacts: The full path of an empty folder for test artifacts
  3. SHOULD execute the playbook with all Ansible tags best represent the intended test context.
    1. The choice of test context tags is related to the test subject being tested
  4. MUST execute Ansible with inventory set to the full path of the file or directory tests/inventory if it exists.
    1. If the tests/inventory file doesn't exist, then the following inventory SHOULD be used as a default:
      /usr/share/ansible/inventory
  5. MUST execute the playbook as root.
  6. MUST examine the exit code of the playbook. A zero exit code is successful test result, non-zero is failure.
  7. MUST treat the file test.log in the artifacts folder as the main readable output of the test.
  8. SHOULD place the textual stdout/stderr of the ansible-playbook command in the ansible.log file in the artifacts folder.
  9. SHOULD treat the contents of the artifacts folder as the test artifacts.

Each test suite playbook or test framework contained therein:

  1. SHOULD drop privileges appropriately if the test suite should be run as non-root.
  2. MUST install any requirements of its test suite or test framework and MUST fail if this is not possible.
  3. MUST provision the test subject listed in the subjects variable appropriately for its playbook name (described above) and MUST fail if this is not possible.
  4. MUST place the main readable output of the test suite into a test.log file in the artifacts variable folder. This MUST happen even if some of the test suites fail.
  5. SHOULD place additional test artifacts in the folder defined in the artifacts variable.
  6. MUST return a zero exit code of the playbook if the test result is a pass, or a non-zero exit code if the test result is a fail.

If an inventory file or script exists, it:

  1. MUST describe where to invoke the playbook and how to connect to that target.
  2. SHOULD launch or install any supported $TEST_SUBJECTS so that the playbook can be invoked against them.
  3. SHOULD put relevant logs in the $TEST_ARTIFACTS directory.

Discovery

Test discovery is done via dist-git. Both packages and modules may have tests in this format. To list which test context a given dist-git directory or playbook is relevant for, use a command like the following: 

# ansible-playbook --list-tags tests.yml

Scope

Since the tests are added in a sub-folder of the dist-git repo, there are no changes required to the Fedora infrastructure and will have no impact on the packagers' workflow and tooling.

Only the testing system will need to be taught to install the requirements and run the playbooks.

User Experience

A standard way to package, store and run tests benefits Fedora stability, and makes Fedora better for users.

  • This structure makes it easy to run locally thus potentially reproducing an error triggered on the test system.
  • Ansible is being more and more popular, thus making it easier for people to contribute new tests
  • Used by a lot of sys-admin, ansible could help sys-admin to bring test-cases to the packagers and developers about situation where something failed for them.

Upgrade/compatibility impact

There are no real upgrade or compatibility impact. The tests will be branched per release as spec files are branched dist-git is now.

Documentation

Proposals and Evaluation

During the selection process for a standard test invocation and and layout format for Fedora, several proposals were examined.

Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/InvokingTests&oldid=510471"