Test Day:2018-10-03 DNF 3.5.1: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:58, 23 November 2018

DNF 3.5.1


Date	2018-10-03
Time	all day

Website	QA/Test Days
IRC	#fedora-test-day (webirc)
Mailing list	test

Can't make the date?
If you come to this page before or after the test day is completed, your testing is still valuable, and you can use the information on this page to test, file any bugs you find at Bugzilla, and add your results to the results section. If this page is more than a month old when you arrive here, please check the current schedule and see if a similar but more recent Test Day is planned or has already happened.

What to test?[edit]

Today's installment of Fedora Test Day will focus on testing

feedback on modularity
serious regressions to YUM v3
user experience issues (inconsistencies, awkward behavior)
any performance issues

Who's available[edit]

The following cast of characters will be available testing, workarounds, bug fixes, and general discussion. In case of problem related to test day organization/wiki/whatever, please reach out to sumantrom.

Development - dmach (dmach), jmracek (jmracek)
Quality Assurance - Adam Williamson (adamw),coremodule (coremodule), Sumantro Mukherjee (sumantrom)

Prerequisite for Test Day[edit]

A system (real or virtual) you can install Fedora to, and not mind if it breaks
A Fedora 29 image: download beta Workstation or Server, or a Fedora 29 nightly image

How to test?[edit]

Install Fedora 29[edit]

Testing DNF from a live environment is difficult and will likely wind up with the system exhausting available RAM and failing in strange ways, so we recommend you install Fedora 29 for this Test Day.

Update your machine[edit]

Make sure you have all the current updates installed, using the update manager. Note that a clean installed Fedora 29 system will have DNF 3.5.1, while after update from updates-testing (which is enabled by default), you should have DNF 3.6.1 from this update. We are interested in tests with both versions. If you find an issue with one version, it would be very useful to check if it also happens with the other.

Run the tests[edit]

Visit the result page and click on the column title links to see the tests that need to be run: most column titles are links to a specific test case. Follow the instructions there, then enter your results by clicking the Enter result button for the test.

Reporting bugs[edit]

If you have problems with any of the tests, report a bug to Bugzilla usually for the component dnf. If you are unsure about exactly how to file the report or what other information to include, just ask on IRC and we will help you.

Known issues[edit]

Test Results[edit]

Basic tests[edit]

User	Profile	Basic	Base update cli	Lang Pack	References
Paul-Muadib		pass	pass	pass
Renault	F29 x86_64	pass ^[1]	pass	fail ^[2]	↑ RHBZ #1625259 ↑ RHBZ #1380069
aacosta	Fedora Server 28 x86_64 kernel 4.18.9-200	pass ^[1]	pass	pass ^[2]	↑ conflicts between dnf packages solve by passing --best --allowerasing ↑ #1380069, Noticed that removing langpacks-es did not remove glibc-langpack-es-2.27-32.fc28.x86_64 which installed during the installation test. Looks like this bug has been around since F25. FYI had to manually dnf remove glib-langpack-es
alciregi	armv7hl Raspberry Pi 3	pass
davidmoreta	Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates	pass	pass	fail ^[1] pass ^[2]	↑ RHBZ #1380069 ↑ RHBZ #1380069
davisclick	VMVare Workstation x86_64	pass
davisclick	VMWare Workstation x86_64	pass	pass	pass
jaydeepgo	Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29-20180929.n.0 Virt-manager x86_64	pass ^[1]	pass	pass	↑ conflicts between dnf packages solve by passing --best --allowerasing
nabooengineer	Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates	pass		fail ^[1]	↑ RHBZ #1380069 Noticed that removing langpacks-fr did not remove glibc-langpack-fr-2.28-9.fc29.x86_64 which installed during the installation test. Looks like this bug has been around since F25. FYI had to manually dnf remove glib-langpack-fr
pyadav	Workstation x86_64	pass	pass	pass
srkraken	VM 2core 4gb Ram Fedora 29 X86_64	pass ^[1]	pass ^[2]	pass ^[3]	↑ No Issues. ↑ No Issues. ↑ No Issues.
tablepc	Lenovo M58p with E8400 processor bare metal clean install of F29 10/01 drop	warn ^[1]	warn ^[2]	pass ^[3]	↑ I got intermittent failures. I tried using the --best and the --alloweraseing when appropriate, but that did not work the failure type changed. I have saved text files showing the failures. I will attach them if I can find a place to do so. ↑ Intermittent failure. I don't know if the problem is with dnf or with the repos. Some times when I run updates it fails sometimes it doesn't (I started this testing yesterday). ↑ This ran fine.

[1] RHBZ #1625259

[2] RHBZ #1380069

[3] ts between dnf packages solve by passing --best --allowerasing

[4] #1380069, Noticed that removing langpacks-es did not remove glibc-langpack-es-2.27-32.fc28.x86_64 which installed during the installation test. Looks like this bug has been around since F25. FYI had to manually dnf remove glib-langpack-es

[5] RHBZ #1380069

[6] RHBZ #1380069

[7] ts between dnf packages solve by passing --best --allowerasing

[8] RHBZ #1380069 Noticed that removing langpacks-fr did not remove glibc-langpack-fr-2.28-9.fc29.x86_64 which installed during the installation test. Looks like this bug has been around since F25. FYI had to manually dnf remove glib-langpack-fr

[9] No Issues.

[10] No Issues.

[11] No Issues.

[12] I got intermittent failures. I tried using the --best and the --alloweraseing when appropriate, but that did not work the failure type changed. I have saved text files showing the failures. I will attach them if I can find a place to do so.

[13] Intermittent failure. I don't know if the problem is with dnf or with the repos. Some times when I run updates it fails sometimes it doesn't (I started this testing yesterday).

[14] This ran fine.

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[1]

[2]

[3]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 The following cast of characters will be available testing, workarounds, bug fixes, and general discussion. In case of problem related to test day organization/wiki/whatever, please reach out to sumantrom.
-* Development - [[User:dmach|dmach]] (dmach)
+* Development - [[User:dmach|dmach]] (dmach), [[User:jmracek|jmracek]] (jmracek)
 * Quality Assurance - [[User:adamw|Adam Williamson]] (adamw),[[User:coremodule|coremodule ]] (coremodule), [[User:sumantrom|Sumantro Mukherjee ]] (sumantrom)
@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 === Update your machine ===
-Make sure you have all the current updates installed, using the update manager.
+Make sure you have all the current updates installed, using the update manager. Note that a clean installed Fedora 29 system will have DNF 3.5.1, while after update from updates-testing (which is enabled by default), you should have DNF 3.6.1 from [https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-abc8825d92 this update]. We are interested in tests with both versions. If you find an issue with one version, it would be very useful to check if it also happens with the other.
 === Run the tests ===
@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 == Reporting bugs ==
-If you have problems with any of the tests, report a bug to [https://bugzilla.redhat.com Bugzilla] usually for the component [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=26&component=dnf DNF 3.5.1]. If you are unsure about exactly how to file the report or what other information to include, just ask on IRC and we will help you.
+If you have problems with any of the tests, report a bug to [https://bugzilla.redhat.com Bugzilla] usually for the component [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=29&component=dnf dnf]. If you are unsure about exactly how to file the report or what other information to include, just ask on IRC and we will help you.
 == Known issues ==
@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 == Test Results ==
-Please enter your results on the [http://testdays.fedorainfracloud.org/events/52 result page]. The results will be transferred here after the Test Day is finished.
+=== Basic tests ===
+{|
+! User
+! Profile
+! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_DNF_2.0 Basic]
+! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_base_update_cli Base update cli]
+! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_langpacks_packages Lang Pack]
+! References
+|-
+| [[User:Paul-Muadib|Paul-Muadib]]
+|
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|pass}}
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:Renault|Renault]]
+| F29 x86_64
+| {{result|pass}}<ref>{{bz|1625259}} </ref>
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1380069}} </ref>
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:aacosta|aacosta]]
+| Fedora Server 28 x86_64  kernel 4.18.9-200
+| {{result|pass}}<ref>conflicts between dnf packages solve by passing --best --allowerasing</ref>
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|pass}}<ref>#1380069, Noticed that removing langpacks-es did not remove glibc-langpack-es-2.27-32.fc28.x86_64 which installed during the installation test. Looks like this bug has been around since F25. FYI had to manually dnf remove glib-langpack-es</ref>
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:alciregi|alciregi]]
+| armv7hl Raspberry Pi 3
+| {{result|pass}}
+|
+|
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:davidmoreta|davidmoreta]]
+| Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1380069}} </ref>{{result|pass}}<ref>{{bz|1380069}} </ref>
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:davisclick|davisclick]]
+| VMVare Workstation x86_64
+| {{result|pass}}
+|
+|
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:davisclick|davisclick]]
+| VMWare Workstation x86_64
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|pass}}
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:jaydeepgo|jaydeepgo]]
+| Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29-20180929.n.0   Virt-manager   x86_64
+| {{result|pass}}<ref>conflicts between dnf packages solve by passing --best --allowerasing</ref>
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|pass}}
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:nabooengineer|nabooengineer]]
+| Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
+| {{result|pass}}
+|
+| {{result|fail}}<ref>{{bz|1380069}} Noticed that removing langpacks-fr did not remove glibc-langpack-fr-2.28-9.fc29.x86_64 which installed during the installation test. Looks like this bug has been around since F25. FYI had to manually dnf remove glib-langpack-fr</ref>
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:pyadav|pyadav]]
+| Workstation x86_64
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|pass}}
+| {{result|pass}}
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:srkraken|srkraken]]
+| VM 2core 4gb Ram Fedora 29 X86_64
+| {{result|pass}}<ref> No Issues. </ref>
+| {{result|pass}}<ref> No Issues. </ref>
+| {{result|pass}}<ref> No Issues. </ref>
+| <references/>
+|-
+| [[User:tablepc|tablepc]]
+| Lenovo M58p with E8400 processor bare metal clean install of F29 10/01 drop
+| {{result|warn}}<ref>I got intermittent failures. I tried using the --best and the --alloweraseing when appropriate, but that did not work the failure type changed. I have saved text files showing the failures. I will attach them if I can find a place to do so.</ref>
+| {{result|warn}}<ref>Intermittent failure. I don't know if the problem is with dnf or with the repos. Some times when I run updates it fails sometimes it doesn't (I started this testing yesterday).</ref>
+| {{result|pass}}<ref>This ran fine.</ref>
+| <references/>
+|-
+|}
 [[Category:Fedora 29 Test Days]]

Search