From Fedora Project Wiki

< FWN‎ | Beats

 
(31 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure


Contributing Writer:  HuzaifaSidhpurwala
Contributing Writer:  [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]]


=== Intrusion update ===
[[MikeMcGrath| Mike McGrath]] sent a link <ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-March/msg00010.html</ref> to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00277.html</ref>


Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.


=== Puppet training ===
There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.


[[MikeMcGrath|Mike McGrath]] wrote on the @fedora-infrastructure-list [2] that he is going to hold a puppet training next wednesday. He also posted an ogg and the slide deck [3] to which his live training will be identical.  
[[Dennis Gilmore|DennisGilmore]] started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims<ref>https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-March/msg00294.html</ref> on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication.
It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.


[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00124.html
<references/>
 
[3] http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/puppet/
 
=== Fedora 10 Beta Release Planning Meeting ===
 
[[JohnPoelstra|John Poelstra]] wrote on the @fedora-infrastructure-list [4] about the Fedora 10 Beta Release Planning Meeting. He has also posted the list of participants and the meeting logs.
 
[4] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00135.html
 
=== Infrastructure update notice ===
 
[[PaulFrields | Paul W. Frields ]] wrote on the @fedora-infrastructure-list [5] about the announcement which went out on the fedora-announce-list [6]. Paul confirmed that all of our services were back online now.
 
[5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-September/msg00140.html
 
[6] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-September/msg00009.html

Latest revision as of 04:36, 6 April 2009

Infrastructure

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-infrastructure-list

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure

Contributing Writer: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala

Intrusion update

Mike McGrath sent a link [1] to the list about the intrusion which was sent to the fedora-announce-list earlier.[2]

Mike said that he was waiting to discuss authentication mechanisms for the fedora-servers, Since passwords+ssh keys are not the most secure authentication mechanism. Also it seems that fedora does not have the budget for any RSA token like system for authentication.

There was a lot of discussion on this thread, with various people proposing different authentication mechanisms which could be used.

DennisGilmore started a similar thread about Auth Mechanims[3] on which he discussed using etoken or Yubikey for authentication. It was a two factor authentication and therefore was more secure than passphrase or ssh keys.