No edit summary |
Churchyard (talk | contribs) m (repoquery actually returns generated BuildRequires) |
||
(20 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= | = DynamicBuildRequires = | ||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Targeted release: [[Releases/31|Fedora 31]] | * Targeted release: [[Releases/31|Fedora 31]] | ||
* Last updated: {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}} | * Last updated: {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}} | ||
* Tracker bug: | * Tracker bug: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704773 #1704773] | ||
* Release notes tracker: [https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/release-notes/issue/335 #335] | |||
== Detailed Description == | == Detailed Description == | ||
For many languages (Rust, Golang, Node.Js, Ruby, Python), BuildRequires can be automatically generated. All it takes, run some special tool which will output dependencies in RPM format. | For many languages (Rust, Golang, Node.Js, Ruby, Python, Haskell), BuildRequires can be automatically generated. All it takes, run some special tool which will output dependencies in RPM format. | ||
=== Changes in tooling === | === Changes in tooling === | ||
Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
* <code>src.rpm</code> produced by <code>rpmbuild -ba</code> will contain dynamic BuildRequires | * <code>src.rpm</code> produced by <code>rpmbuild -ba</code> will contain dynamic BuildRequires | ||
* Option <code>-bs</code> does not change behavior | * Option <code>-bs</code> does not change behavior | ||
* <code>src.rpm</code> produced from spec file which has <code>%generate_buildrequires</code> has <code>Requires: rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires)</code> | |||
* <code>src.rpm</code> which contain dynamic BuildRequires has <code>Provides: rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires)</code> for identification purposes | |||
==== mock ==== | ==== mock ==== | ||
Line 39: | Line 42: | ||
=== Example === | === Example === | ||
Probably easiest demonstration how this works is to show example. First, let's make necessary changes in our spec file (I'm taking <code>rust-rpick</code>). | Probably the easiest demonstration of how this works is to show an example. | ||
Create this simple SPEC file `~/rpmbuild/SPECS/dynamic-buildrequires.spec`: | |||
<pre> | |||
Name: dynamic-buildrequires | |||
Version: 1 | |||
Release: 1%{?dist} | |||
Summary: Demonstration of Dynamic BuildRequires | |||
License: GPLv3+ | |||
# static buildrequires | |||
BuildRequires: bash | |||
%description | |||
This package demonstrate Dynamic BuildRequires | |||
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires | |||
%generate_buildrequires | |||
echo fruit-cake | |||
%files | |||
%changelog | |||
* Thu Jun 13 2019 Miroslav Suchy <msuchy@redhat.com> - 1-2 | |||
- initial version | |||
</pre> | |||
This SPEC file has a new section `%generate_buildrequires` which contains a script. The output of this script is interpreted as additional BuildRequires. The list accrues to classic BuildRequires tags. In this example we dynamically added BuildRequires of `fruit-cake` (which does not exist). | |||
Now if you try to build this package: | |||
<pre> | |||
# rpmbuild -ba dynamic-buildrequires.spec | |||
Executing(buildreqs): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JMyoKz | |||
+ umask 022 | |||
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD | |||
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD | |||
+ echo fruit-cake | |||
+ exit 0 | |||
error: Failed build dependencies: | |||
fruit-cake is needed by dynamic-buildrequires-1-1.fc31.x86_64 | |||
Wrote: /rpmbuild/SRPMS/dynamic-buildrequires-1-1.fc31.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm | |||
# echo $? | |||
11 | |||
</pre> | |||
Two things happened: `rpmbuild` exited with exit code 11. This indicates the unsatisfied dynamic BuildRequires. If our script would produce a line with 'bash' we would likely have it already installed and `rpmbuild` would proceed further without failure. | |||
Additionally, And notice that this is 'buildreqs.nosrc.rpm'. If you would extract the content of the NOSRC.RPM it would contain the original SPEC file, but there would be no sources attached. But most importantly - the requires of this package include the dynamically generated dependencies: | |||
<pre> | |||
# rpm -qpR rpmbuild/SRPMS/dynamic-buildrequires-1-1.fc31.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm | |||
bash | |||
fruit-cake | |||
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 | |||
rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires) <= 4.15.0-1 | |||
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 | |||
</pre> | |||
==== Rust Example ==== | |||
First, let's make necessary changes in our spec file (I'm taking <code>rust-rpick</code>). | |||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
Line 202: | Line 266: | ||
rust-packaging | rust-packaging | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
==== Go Example ==== | |||
For Go language, you can use `%go_generate_buildrequires` macro. See full example here: https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/templates/rpm/spectemplate-go-0-source-minimal.spec#_103 | |||
==== Python ==== | |||
BuildRequires: pyproject-rpm-macros | |||
%generate_buildrequires | |||
%pyproject_buildrequires | |||
This will read the dependencies from `setup_requires` from setup.py. If you want to read the dependencies from `install_requires` and use them as BuildRequires then you have to use `%pyproject_buildrequires -r`. | |||
For more information see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros | |||
== Benefit to Fedora == | == Benefit to Fedora == | ||
Line 213: | Line 292: | ||
== Scope == | == Scope == | ||
* Proposal owners: Implement support for a feature in RPM and mock. Make use of it in interested ecosystems. | * Proposal owners: Implement support for a feature in RPM<sup>[https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/593 1]</sup> and mock<sup>[https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/248 1]</sup>. Make use of it in interested ecosystems. | ||
* Other developers: Maintainers of language stacks are advised to use this feature. | * Other developers: Maintainers of language stacks are advised to use this feature. | ||
* Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8129 #8129] | * Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8129 #8129] | ||
Line 221: | Line 300: | ||
== Upgrade/compatibility impact == | == Upgrade/compatibility impact == | ||
Packagers and users who use repoquery might be affected (src.rpm might not contain generated dependencies). | <del>Packagers and users who use repoquery might be affected (src.rpm might not contain generated dependencies).</del> -- repoquery actually returns generated BuildRequires | ||
== How To Test == | == How To Test == | ||
Line 232: | Line 311: | ||
== User Experience == | == User Experience == | ||
For people/tooling who build RPMs, it might be needed to run <code>dnf builddep</code> on new file generated by RPM when dynamic BuildRequires detected and unsatisfied ones found - <code>buildreqs.nosrc.rpm</code>. RPM will guide you where it stored it and which name file has. | |||
== Dependencies == | == Dependencies == | ||
Line 247: | Line 327: | ||
== Release Notes == | == Release Notes == | ||
[[Category: | https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f31/release-notes/developers/Developers/#developers-dynamic-buildrequires | ||
[[Category:ChangeAcceptedF31]] | |||
[[Category:SystemWideChange]] | [[Category:SystemWideChange]] |
Latest revision as of 13:35, 31 August 2022
DynamicBuildRequires
Summary
Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec file and teach RPM and mock how to handle this.
Owner
- Name: Igor Gnatenko, Florian Festi, Miroslav Suchý
- Email: ignatenkobrain@fedoraproject.org, ffesti@redhat.com, miroslav@suchy.cz
- Release notes owner:
Current status
- Targeted release: Fedora 31
- Last updated: 2022-08-31
- Tracker bug: #1704773
- Release notes tracker: #335
Detailed Description
For many languages (Rust, Golang, Node.Js, Ruby, Python, Haskell), BuildRequires can be automatically generated. All it takes, run some special tool which will output dependencies in RPM format.
Changes in tooling
rpmbuild
- New
%generate_buildrequires
section ("script" later in text) in spec file - New option
-br
which will run script, check dynamic BuildRequires- If all of them are satisfied, generate
src.rpm
- If some of them are not satisfied or
--nodeps
is present, generatebuildreqs.nosrc.rpm
- If all of them are satisfied, generate
src.rpm
produced byrpmbuild -ba
will contain dynamic BuildRequires- Option
-bs
does not change behavior src.rpm
produced from spec file which has%generate_buildrequires
hasRequires: rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires)
src.rpm
which contain dynamic BuildRequires hasProvides: rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires)
for identification purposes
mock
- New option in config
dynamic_buildrequires
which controls support of new features - Support for rpmbuild changes if this option enabled
Example
Probably the easiest demonstration of how this works is to show an example.
Create this simple SPEC file ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/dynamic-buildrequires.spec
:
Name: dynamic-buildrequires Version: 1 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Demonstration of Dynamic BuildRequires License: GPLv3+ # static buildrequires BuildRequires: bash %description This package demonstrate Dynamic BuildRequires https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires %generate_buildrequires echo fruit-cake %files %changelog * Thu Jun 13 2019 Miroslav Suchy <msuchy@redhat.com> - 1-2 - initial version
This SPEC file has a new section %generate_buildrequires
which contains a script. The output of this script is interpreted as additional BuildRequires. The list accrues to classic BuildRequires tags. In this example we dynamically added BuildRequires of fruit-cake
(which does not exist).
Now if you try to build this package:
# rpmbuild -ba dynamic-buildrequires.spec Executing(buildreqs): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JMyoKz + umask 022 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + echo fruit-cake + exit 0 error: Failed build dependencies: fruit-cake is needed by dynamic-buildrequires-1-1.fc31.x86_64 Wrote: /rpmbuild/SRPMS/dynamic-buildrequires-1-1.fc31.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm # echo $? 11
Two things happened: rpmbuild
exited with exit code 11. This indicates the unsatisfied dynamic BuildRequires. If our script would produce a line with 'bash' we would likely have it already installed and rpmbuild
would proceed further without failure.
Additionally, And notice that this is 'buildreqs.nosrc.rpm'. If you would extract the content of the NOSRC.RPM it would contain the original SPEC file, but there would be no sources attached. But most importantly - the requires of this package include the dynamically generated dependencies:
# rpm -qpR rpmbuild/SRPMS/dynamic-buildrequires-1-1.fc31.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm bash fruit-cake rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires) <= 4.15.0-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
Rust Example
First, let's make necessary changes in our spec file (I'm taking rust-rpick
).
diff --git a/rust-rpick.spec b/rust-rpick.spec index 716a185..01a6d35 100644 --- a/rust-rpick.spec +++ b/rust-rpick.spec @@ -16,12 +16,6 @@ Source: %{crates_source} ExclusiveArch: %{rust_arches} BuildRequires: rust-packaging -BuildRequires: (crate(dirs/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(dirs/default) < 2.0.0) -BuildRequires: (crate(rand/default) >= 0.6.0 with crate(rand/default) < 0.7.0) -BuildRequires: (crate(serde/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde/default) < 2.0.0) -BuildRequires: (crate(serde/derive) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde/derive) < 2.0.0) -BuildRequires: (crate(serde_yaml/default) >= 0.8.0 with crate(serde_yaml/default) < 0.9.0) -BuildRequires: (crate(structopt/default) >= 0.2.0 with crate(structopt/default) < 0.3.0) %global _description \ Helps you pick items from a list by various algorithms. Example uses: pick a\ @@ -69,6 +63,9 @@ which use "default" feature of "%{crate}" crate. %autosetup -n %{crate}-%{version_no_tilde} -p1 %cargo_prep +%generate_buildrequires +%cargo_generate_buildrequires + %build %cargo_build
Then let's try to build package (I will skip parts like rustc executions because it is irrelevant).
⋊> ~/P/s/r/rust-rpick on master ⨯ fedpkg mockbuild --mock-config $PWD/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-buildreqs.cfg Wrote: /home/brain/Projects/src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 1.4.14 starting (python version = 3.7.3)... […] INFO: Start(/home/brain/Projects/src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64-buildreqs) […] Start: build phase for rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Start: build setup for rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Building target platforms: x86_64 Building for target x86_64 Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Repository 'kkt' is missing name in configuration, using id. fedora 21 kB/s | 19 kB 00:00 kkt 2.6 MB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00 Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repo Size ================================================================================ Installing: rust-packaging x86_64 6-28.fc31+buildreqs kkt 13 k Installing dependencies: […] Finish: build setup for rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Start: rpmbuild rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Start: Outputting list of installed packages Finish: Outputting list of installed packages Building target platforms: x86_64 Building for target x86_64 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0m57Wu + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf rpick-0.3.0 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/rpick-0.3.0.crate + /usr/bin/tar -xof - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd rpick-0.3.0 + /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + set -eu + /usr/bin/mkdir -p .cargo + cat + /usr/bin/rm -f Cargo.lock + exit 0 Executing(buildreqs): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LooeBv + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd rpick-0.3.0 + /usr/bin/cargo-inspector -BR Cargo.toml + /usr/bin/cargo-inspector -TR Cargo.toml + exit 0 Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm INFO: Dynamic buildrequires detected Repository 'kkt' is missing name in configuration, using id. fedora 17 kB/s | 19 kB 00:01 kkt 2.8 MB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00 Package rust-packaging-6-28.fc31+buildreqs.x86_64 is already installed. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repo Size ================================================================================ Installing: rust-dirs+default-devel noarch 1.0.5-1.fc31 fedora 7.6 k rust-rand+default-devel noarch 0.6.5-3.fc31 fedora 8.4 k rust-serde+default-devel noarch 1.0.90-1.fc31 fedora 12 k rust-serde+derive-devel noarch 1.0.90-1.fc31 fedora 12 k rust-serde_yaml+default-devel noarch 0.8.8-2.fc30 fedora 8.3 k rust-structopt+default-devel noarch 0.2.15-2.fc31 fedora 8.2 k Installing dependencies: […] Building target platforms: x86_64 Building for target x86_64 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.l2cC5s + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + rm -rf rpick-0.3.0 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/rpick-0.3.0.crate + /usr/bin/tar -xof - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd rpick-0.3.0 + /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + set -eu + /usr/bin/mkdir -p .cargo + cat + /usr/bin/rm -f Cargo.lock + exit 0 Executing(buildreqs): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.cvhwuw + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd rpick-0.3.0 + /usr/bin/cargo-inspector -BR Cargo.toml + /usr/bin/cargo-inspector -TR Cargo.toml + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dlI3ax + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd rpick-0.3.0 + /usr/bin/env CARGO_HOME=.cargo RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 /usr/bin/cargo build -j8 -Z avoid-dev-deps --release […] Finish: build phase for rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm INFO: Done(/home/brain/Projects/src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64-buildreqs) 2 minutes 9 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/brain/Projects/src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/results_rust-rpick/0.3.0/1.fc31 INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_success=True') Start: clean chroot Finish: clean chroot Finish: run
Let's check dependencies of src.rpm.
⋊> ~/P/s/r/rust-rpick on master ⨯ rpm -qpR $PWD/results_rust-rpick/0.3.0/1.fc31/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm (crate(dirs/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(dirs/default) < 2.0.0) (crate(rand/default) >= 0.6.0 with crate(rand/default) < 0.7.0) (crate(serde/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde/default) < 2.0.0) (crate(serde/derive) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde/derive) < 2.0.0) (crate(serde_yaml/default) >= 0.8.0 with crate(serde_yaml/default) < 0.9.0) (crate(structopt/default) >= 0.2.0 with crate(structopt/default) < 0.3.0) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires) <= 4.15.0-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(RichDependencies) <= 4.12.0-1 rust-packaging
Go Example
For Go language, you can use %go_generate_buildrequires
macro. See full example here: https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/templates/rpm/spectemplate-go-0-source-minimal.spec#_103
Python
BuildRequires: pyproject-rpm-macros %generate_buildrequires %pyproject_buildrequires
This will read the dependencies from setup_requires
from setup.py. If you want to read the dependencies from install_requires
and use them as BuildRequires then you have to use %pyproject_buildrequires -r
.
For more information see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros
Benefit to Fedora
Packagers won't have to pre-generate BuildRequires in the spec file which means it will be always updated (and correct) :
- Packagers can focus of making their packages better instead of spending all their packaging time copying BuildRequires from documentation and third party tools.
- BuildRequires are dropped as soon as they're no longer necessary
- Packages can be easily bumped without requiring a manual BuildRequires refresh
- BuildRequires and Requires generation can use similar utilities, making sure that the deps packages declare can also be used for second-level building. Packages no longer need to declare the deps of their second and n-th dependencies because someone forgot to declare them in the correct package.
Scope
- Proposal owners: Implement support for a feature in RPM1 and mock1. Make use of it in interested ecosystems.
- Other developers: Maintainers of language stacks are advised to use this feature.
- Release engineering: #8129
- List of deliverables: N/A
- Policies and guidelines: Packaging Guidelines need to be updated with instructions how to use this feature.
- Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
Upgrade/compatibility impact
Packagers and users who use repoquery might be affected (src.rpm might not contain generated dependencies). -- repoquery actually returns generated BuildRequires
How To Test
- Make sure you have new
rpm-build
(OPTION 1) ormock
(OPTION 2). - Add
%generate_buildrequires
script into spec file which prints dependencies, remove static BuildRequires - Build package
- OPTION1: Run
rpmbuild -ba
with your usual workflow - OPTION2: Run
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64
with your usual workflow
- OPTION1: Run
- Check that your package builds fine, dependencies are getting checked/installed and final src.rpm contains generated BuildRequires
User Experience
For people/tooling who build RPMs, it might be needed to run dnf builddep
on new file generated by RPM when dynamic BuildRequires detected and unsatisfied ones found - buildreqs.nosrc.rpm
. RPM will guide you where it stored it and which name file has.
Dependencies
Required feature needs to be implemented in RPM and mock.
Contingency Plan
- Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) Proposal Owners might still ship feature disabled for Fedora buildsystem but have it available for end-users, and move full completion to the next release.
- Contingency deadline: Beta Freeze
- Blocks release? No.
- Blocks product? No.
Documentation
TBD.