From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}} | {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}} | ||
[[Image:Join_ContentDeveloper.png]] | |||
Every once in a while someone posts an (often entertainning) diatribe on the state of Linux fonts and text layouting. A complex mix of exaggerations, long-past facts, subjective preferences, references to other distributions, and plain mistakes, they nevertheless contain little nuggets of truth pointing to actual problems. | Every once in a while someone posts an (often entertainning) diatribe on the state of Linux fonts and text layouting. A complex mix of exaggerations, long-past facts, subjective preferences, references to other distributions, and plain mistakes, they nevertheless contain little nuggets of truth pointing to actual problems. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
Because the [[:Category:Fonts SIG|Fonts SIG]] is all about fixing those problems, we encourage people to list those articles there: | Because the [[:Category:Fonts SIG|Fonts SIG]] is all about fixing those problems, we encourage people to list those articles there: | ||
* [http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/06/catastrafont.html | * [http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/06/catastrafont.html Catastrafont], 2008-06-16 | ||
* [http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/archives/2008/03/20/T13_47_17/ | * [http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/archives/2008/03/20/T13_47_17/ State of fonts review]<ref>weak points: subjective preferences, technical assessments; strong point: state of our font preferences tools.</ref>, 2008-03-20 | ||
* [http://www.bel.fi/~alankila/blog/2007/04/25/Why%20Linux%20fonts%20suck.html Why Linux fonts suck], 2007-04-25 | |||
* [http://cdtdoug.blogspot.com/2007/04/microsoft-is-making-my-linux-fonts-ugly.html Microsoft is making my Linux fonts ugly]<ref>Even developers refuse to use systems with ugly fonts.</ref>, 2007-04-12 | |||
* [http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=70 Is it fonts that holds back Linux growth?] 2006-10-18 | * [http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=70 Is it fonts that holds back Linux growth?] 2006-10-18 | ||
* [http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/17/linux-achilles-heel-fonts/ Linux Achilles' heel: fonts] 2006-08-17 | * [http://scobleizer.com/2006/08/17/linux-achilles-heel-fonts/ Linux Achilles' heel: fonts] 2006-08-17 | ||
{{:Fonts_SIG_signature}} [[Category:Fonts SIG]] | |||
Notes: | |||
<references/> | |||
{{:Fonts_SIG_signature}} [[Category:Fonts SIG news]] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:15, 17 February 2009
Every once in a while someone posts an (often entertainning) diatribe on the state of Linux fonts and text layouting. A complex mix of exaggerations, long-past facts, subjective preferences, references to other distributions, and plain mistakes, they nevertheless contain little nuggets of truth pointing to actual problems.
Because the Fonts SIG is all about fixing those problems, we encourage people to list those articles there:
- Catastrafont, 2008-06-16
- State of fonts review[1], 2008-03-20
- Why Linux fonts suck, 2007-04-25
- Microsoft is making my Linux fonts ugly[2], 2007-04-12
- Is it fonts that holds back Linux growth? 2006-10-18
- Linux Achilles' heel: fonts 2006-08-17
Notes:
Fonts in Fedora
The Fonts SIG takes loving care of Fedora fonts. Please join this special interest group if you are interested in creating, improving, packaging, or just suggesting a font. Any help will be appreciated.
The Fonts SIG takes loving care of Fedora fonts. Please join this special interest group if you are interested in creating, improving, packaging, or just suggesting a font. Any help will be appreciated.