(→Owner) |
(Add trackers) |
||
(22 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this change is and what it will do. This information is used for the overall changeset summary page for each release. Note that motivation for the change should be in the Benefit to Fedora section below, and this part should answer the question "What?" rather than "Why?". --> | <!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this change is and what it will do. This information is used for the overall changeset summary page for each release. Note that motivation for the change should be in the Benefit to Fedora section below, and this part should answer the question "What?" rather than "Why?". --> | ||
It sometimes happens that Python packages succeed to build with incorrect version metadata. | It sometimes happens that Python packages succeed to build as RPM with incorrect version metadata. | ||
They generate a wrong | They generate a wrong provide in format `python3dist(...) = 0` and `python3.Xdist(...) = 0`. | ||
While version 0 (or equal versions like 0.0 or 0.0.0) is probably technically valid, in most cases this indicates a packaging error. | While version `0` (or equal versions like `0.0` or `0.0.0`) is probably technically valid, in most cases this indicates a packaging error. | ||
We propose to prevent this error from happening by explicitly failing the RPM build instead of generating such provides. | We propose to prevent this error from happening by explicitly failing the RPM build instead of generating such provides. | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
== Current status == | == Current status == | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:ChangeAcceptedF38]] | ||
<!-- When your change proposal page is completed and ready for review and announcement --> | <!-- When your change proposal page is completed and ready for review and announcement --> | ||
<!-- remove Category:ChangePageIncomplete and change it to Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler --> | <!-- remove Category:ChangePageIncomplete and change it to Category:ChangeReadyForWrangler --> | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
ON_QA -> change is fully code complete | ON_QA -> change is fully code complete | ||
--> | --> | ||
* FESCo issue: | * [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JMOBH5CIF4XNXSD2LEEF45OW2HYNUZMW/ devel thread] | ||
* Tracker bug: | * FESCo issue: [https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2903 #2903] | ||
* Release notes tracker: | * Tracker bug: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150046 #2150046] | ||
* Release notes tracker: [https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/release-notes/issue/929 #929] | |||
== Detailed Description == | == Detailed Description == | ||
Line 54: | Line 55: | ||
* `python3.Xdist(distname) = 0` | * `python3.Xdist(distname) = 0` | ||
Where X is the Python minor version (eg. 10, 11...) | Where X is the Python minor version (eg. 10, 11...). | ||
It does not affect any other provides. | It does not affect any other provides. | ||
More about | More about these provides: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#Machine-readable-provides | ||
An example of the incorrect provides | The provides generated during the RPM build come from the upstream Python package metadata. | ||
Some Python building backends, eg. setuptools, explicitly allow creating package with version `0.0.0` when the version used by a project is not known. This was [https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/2329 discussed upstream] with conclusion that it's an intended behavior. | |||
In other cases, for example when building package from a particular git commit, the incorrect provide can be generated due to a packaging error. | |||
We've never encountered a situation when packaging the version `0` was the package maintainers intention. | |||
After a discussion on python-devel mailing list we agreed we'd like to prevent such situations from happening in Fedora. | |||
An example of the incorrect provides: | |||
$ rpm -qpP python3-ssh-python-0.10.0-5.fc38.x86_64.rpm | $ rpm -qpP python3-ssh-python-0.10.0-5.fc38.x86_64.rpm | ||
Line 68: | Line 76: | ||
'''python3dist(ssh-python) = 0''' | '''python3dist(ssh-python) = 0''' | ||
Why is it bad? | |||
If any package requires `python3-ssh-python > 0.9` (correctly assuming there's `0.10.0` in Fedora's repositories), the automatic dependency generators will not discover the example package, making the other package non-installable. | |||
In January 2022 the [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=python3dist0 umbrella Bugzilla ticket] was created for Python packages providing version `0`. In all cases the automatic provide wasn't intended. | |||
Affected packages (as of Nov 11 2022): | |||
b43-tools | |||
dionaea | |||
marisa | |||
python-podman-api | |||
rpkg | |||
spectrographic | |||
python-ssh-python | |||
python-streamlink | |||
The change doesn't affect a big part of the Python ecosystem. | The change doesn't affect a big part of the Python ecosystem. | ||
We aim to prevent such situation from happening by increasing the robustness of the python-rpm-generators (namely [https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-generators/blob/rawhide/f/pythondistdeps.py pythondistdeps.py]). | We aim to prevent such situation from happening by increasing the robustness of the python-rpm-generators (namely [https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-generators/blob/rawhide/f/pythondistdeps.py pythondistdeps.py]). | ||
The generator will error and fail the build if `python3dist(...) = 0` was to be generated. | The generator will error and fail the build if `python3dist(...) = 0` was to be generated. | ||
Based on the discussion on fedora-devel mailing list, there will be a mechanism to opt out from this change. | |||
A macro with a provisional name (TBD) `%__python_dist_allow_version_zero` will be created. If defined in the specfile, it will change the invocation of the Python RPM generators not to fail if a package providing version `0` was created. It will behave the same way as an already existing macro [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_python_no_extras_requires %_python_no_extras_requires] does. | |||
== Feedback == | == Feedback == | ||
Line 80: | Line 106: | ||
The idea was posted on [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/K35JCFVJLETVUOICQM634OSYBYQ3Q2WQ/ python-devel mailing list] and received a positive feedback. No alternatives to this approach were proposed. | The idea was posted on [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/K35JCFVJLETVUOICQM634OSYBYQ3Q2WQ/ python-devel mailing list] and received a positive feedback. No alternatives to this approach were proposed. | ||
After the Change was announced on fedora-devel, it was requested to provide a mechanism to opt out from the Change. | |||
It was pointed out that we shouldn't dictate the upstream's decisions, especially that [https://peps.python.org/pep-0440/ PEP 440] doesn't forbid using the version `0.0.0`. OTOH [https://semver.org/ semver specification] recommends starting at `0.1.0`. | |||
The Change was updated to provide such mechanism, see Detailed Description. | |||
== Benefit to Fedora == | == Benefit to Fedora == | ||
Line 113: | Line 144: | ||
* The packages will stop lying about the version they provide. | * The packages will stop lying about the version they provide. | ||
* The requirements generators (eg. `%pyproject_buildrequires`) will correctly evaluate the Build- and Runtime Requirements based on the correct Provides. | * The requirements generators (eg. `%pyproject_buildrequires`) will correctly evaluate the Build- and Runtime Requirements based on the correct Provides. | ||
* The package maintainers who BuildRequire `%{py3dist pkgname}` in their specfiles will always require the correctly evaluated version. | * The package maintainers who BuildRequire `%{py3dist pkgname} >= 0.2` in their specfiles will always require the correctly evaluated version. | ||
== Scope == | == Scope == | ||
* Proposal owners: | * Proposal owners: | ||
# implement & test the change in python-rpm-generators (pythondistdeps.py) | # implement & test the change in python-rpm-generators ([https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-rpm-generators/blob/rawhide/f/pythondistdeps.py pythondistdeps.py]) | ||
<!-- What work do the feature owners have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release? Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?--> | <!-- What work do the feature owners have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release? Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?--> | ||
* Other developers: <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | * Other developers: <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
** | ** Fix the packaging error to generate correct metadata and successful build. There's no common way to deal with such packages. In most of the cases the issue originates from packaging errors that need to be fixed. Contact the change owners if you need help with the necessary changes to your package. | ||
<!-- What work do other developers have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release? Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?--> | <!-- What work do other developers have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release? Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?--> | ||
Line 130: | Line 159: | ||
The issue is required to be filed prior to feature submission, to ensure that someone is on board to do any process development work and testing and that all changes make it into the pipeline; a bullet point in a change is not sufficient communication --> | The issue is required to be filed prior to feature submission, to ensure that someone is on board to do any process development work and testing and that all changes make it into the pipeline; a bullet point in a change is not sufficient communication --> | ||
* Policies and guidelines: | * Policies and guidelines: [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_source_files_from_pypi Python Packaging Guidelines] cover the topic of creating the version string. This will be valid even when we change the Python RPM generators behavior <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
<!-- Do the packaging guidelines or other documents need to be updated for this feature? If so, does it need to happen before or after the implementation is done? If a FPC ticket exists, add a link here. Please submit a pull request with the proposed changes before submitting your Change proposal. --> | <!-- Do the packaging guidelines or other documents need to be updated for this feature? If so, does it need to happen before or after the implementation is done? If a FPC ticket exists, add a link here. Please submit a pull request with the proposed changes before submitting your Change proposal. --> | ||
Line 144: | Line 173: | ||
<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
None. | None. | ||
== How To Test == | == How To Test == | ||
Line 162: | Line 190: | ||
<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
* Prepare a Python package, set the version to `0` | |||
or | |||
* Use one of the known packages that provide version `0`. | |||
* Try to build an RPM package in a regular way (eg. mockbuild) | |||
* The build should fail. | |||
== User Experience == | == User Experience == | ||
Line 181: | Line 213: | ||
<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
None | |||
== Contingency Plan == | == Contingency Plan == | ||
<!-- If you cannot complete your feature by the final development freeze, what is the backup plan? This might be as simple as "Revert the shipped configuration". Or it might not (e.g. rebuilding a number of dependent packages). If you feature is not completed in time we want to assure others that other parts of Fedora will not be in jeopardy. --> | <!-- If you cannot complete your feature by the final development freeze, what is the backup plan? This might be as simple as "Revert the shipped configuration". Or it might not (e.g. rebuilding a number of dependent packages). If you feature is not completed in time we want to assure others that other parts of Fedora will not be in jeopardy. --> | ||
* Contingency mechanism: | * Contingency mechanism: Revert <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
<!-- When is the last time the contingency mechanism can be put in place? This will typically be the beta freeze. --> | <!-- When is the last time the contingency mechanism can be put in place? This will typically be the beta freeze. --> | ||
* Contingency deadline: | * Contingency deadline: Beta freeze <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
<!-- Does finishing this feature block the release, or can we ship with the feature in incomplete state? --> | <!-- Does finishing this feature block the release, or can we ship with the feature in incomplete state? --> | ||
* Blocks release? No <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | * Blocks release? No <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
== Documentation == | == Documentation == | ||
Line 197: | Line 228: | ||
<!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES --> | ||
This page is the documentation of this change. | |||
== Release Notes == | == Release Notes == |
Latest revision as of 18:06, 1 December 2022
Prevent from building RPM packages providing python3dist(...) = 0
Summary
It sometimes happens that Python packages succeed to build as RPM with incorrect version metadata.
They generate a wrong provide in format python3dist(...) = 0
and python3.Xdist(...) = 0
.
While version 0
(or equal versions like 0.0
or 0.0.0
) is probably technically valid, in most cases this indicates a packaging error.
We propose to prevent this error from happening by explicitly failing the RPM build instead of generating such provides.
Owner
- Name: Karolina Surma
- Email: ksurma@redhat.com
Current status
- Targeted release: Fedora Linux 38
- Last updated: 2022-12-01
- devel thread
- FESCo issue: #2903
- Tracker bug: #2150046
- Release notes tracker: #929
Detailed Description
This change is about automatic RPM provides in the following form:
python3dist(distname) = 0
python3.Xdist(distname) = 0
Where X is the Python minor version (eg. 10, 11...). It does not affect any other provides. More about these provides: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#Machine-readable-provides
The provides generated during the RPM build come from the upstream Python package metadata.
Some Python building backends, eg. setuptools, explicitly allow creating package with version 0.0.0
when the version used by a project is not known. This was discussed upstream with conclusion that it's an intended behavior.
In other cases, for example when building package from a particular git commit, the incorrect provide can be generated due to a packaging error.
We've never encountered a situation when packaging the version 0
was the package maintainers intention.
After a discussion on python-devel mailing list we agreed we'd like to prevent such situations from happening in Fedora.
An example of the incorrect provides:
$ rpm -qpP python3-ssh-python-0.10.0-5.fc38.x86_64.rpm python-ssh-python = 0.10.0-5.fc38 python3-ssh-python = 0.10.0-5.fc38 python3-ssh-python(x86-64) = 0.10.0-5.fc38 python3.11-ssh-python = 0.10.0-5.fc38 python3.11dist(ssh-python) = 0 python3dist(ssh-python) = 0
Why is it bad?
If any package requires python3-ssh-python > 0.9
(correctly assuming there's 0.10.0
in Fedora's repositories), the automatic dependency generators will not discover the example package, making the other package non-installable.
In January 2022 the umbrella Bugzilla ticket was created for Python packages providing version 0
. In all cases the automatic provide wasn't intended.
Affected packages (as of Nov 11 2022):
b43-tools dionaea marisa python-podman-api rpkg spectrographic python-ssh-python python-streamlink
The change doesn't affect a big part of the Python ecosystem.
We aim to prevent such situation from happening by increasing the robustness of the python-rpm-generators (namely pythondistdeps.py).
The generator will error and fail the build if python3dist(...) = 0
was to be generated.
Based on the discussion on fedora-devel mailing list, there will be a mechanism to opt out from this change.
A macro with a provisional name (TBD) %__python_dist_allow_version_zero
will be created. If defined in the specfile, it will change the invocation of the Python RPM generators not to fail if a package providing version 0
was created. It will behave the same way as an already existing macro %_python_no_extras_requires does.
Feedback
The idea was posted on python-devel mailing list and received a positive feedback. No alternatives to this approach were proposed.
After the Change was announced on fedora-devel, it was requested to provide a mechanism to opt out from the Change.
It was pointed out that we shouldn't dictate the upstream's decisions, especially that PEP 440 doesn't forbid using the version 0.0.0
. OTOH semver specification recommends starting at 0.1.0
.
The Change was updated to provide such mechanism, see Detailed Description.
Benefit to Fedora
The correct metadata is essential for the whole package ecosystem. More deterministic behavior of the generators will bring those benefits:
- The packages will stop lying about the version they provide.
- The requirements generators (eg.
%pyproject_buildrequires
) will correctly evaluate the Build- and Runtime Requirements based on the correct Provides. - The package maintainers who BuildRequire
%{py3dist pkgname} >= 0.2
in their specfiles will always require the correctly evaluated version.
Scope
- Proposal owners:
- implement & test the change in python-rpm-generators (pythondistdeps.py)
- Other developers:
- Fix the packaging error to generate correct metadata and successful build. There's no common way to deal with such packages. In most of the cases the issue originates from packaging errors that need to be fixed. Contact the change owners if you need help with the necessary changes to your package.
- Release engineering: not needed for this Change
- Policies and guidelines: Python Packaging Guidelines cover the topic of creating the version string. This will be valid even when we change the Python RPM generators behavior
- Trademark approval: not needed for this Change
- Alignment with Objectives: No
Upgrade/compatibility impact
None.
How To Test
- Prepare a Python package, set the version to
0
or
- Use one of the known packages that provide version
0
. - Try to build an RPM package in a regular way (eg. mockbuild)
- The build should fail.
User Experience
The actual users should notice no difference.
Dependencies
None
Contingency Plan
- Contingency mechanism: Revert
- Contingency deadline: Beta freeze
- Blocks release? No
Documentation
This page is the documentation of this change.