From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
m (PackagingDrafts/Font package naming (2008-12-22) moved to Archive:PackagingDrafts/Font package naming (2008-12-22): wiki cleanup) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}} | {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}} | ||
{{Admon/warning | Abandoned proposal | | |||
This proposal was reviewed by [[FPC]] on [[Packaging:Minutes/20090106|2009-01-06]]. FPC felt it didn't try hard enough to achieve distribution-wide naming consistency. A [[PackagingDrafts/Font package naming (2009-01-13)|more ambitious and invasive proposal]] was therefore written that supersedes this page. | |||
}} | |||
== Foreword == | == Foreword == | ||
| Line 25: | Line 29: | ||
* It is good practice to contract '''foundryname''' in a short prefix. | * It is good practice to contract '''foundryname''' in a short prefix. | ||
* When '''foundryname'''-'''fontprojectname''' or '''fontfamilyname''' contain the ''font'' or ''fonts'' affix, it should be skipped to avoid ''foofont-fonts'' packages. | * When '''foundryname'''-'''fontprojectname''' or '''fontfamilyname''' contain the ''font'' or ''fonts'' affix, it should be skipped to avoid ''foofont-fonts'' packages. | ||
* When '''foundryname''' | * When '''fontprojectname''' includes '''foundryname''', it is not necessary to repeat it. | ||
* When '''fontfamilyname''' includes '''fontprojectname''' or '''foundryname''', it is not necessary to repeat them. | |||
* The use of the '''fonts''' suffix is not dependant on the actual number of font files in the package. | * The use of the '''fonts''' suffix is not dependant on the actual number of font files in the package. | ||
| Line 49: | Line 54: | ||
| google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-1.fc11.src.rpm | | google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-1.fc11.src.rpm | ||
| “Droid” fonts published by “Google” | | “Droid” fonts published by “Google” | ||
|- | |||
| un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.src.rpm | |||
| “UN Core” fonts of the “UN” project | |||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="2" | Binary packages (''noarch.rpm'') | | colspan="2" | Binary packages (''noarch.rpm'') | ||
| Line 56: | Line 64: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono-2.27-7.fc11.noarch.rpm | | dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono-2.27-7.fc11.noarch.rpm | ||
| “DejaVu LGC Sans Mono” font of the “DejaVu” project, part of the “DejaVu” release (subpackage) | | “DejaVu LGC Sans Mono” font of the “DejaVu” project, as part of the “DejaVu” release (subpackage) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-4.fc11.noarch.rpm | | gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-4.fc11.noarch.rpm | ||
| Line 62: | Line 70: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| google-droid-fonts-serif-1.0.112-1.fc11.noarch.rpm | | google-droid-fonts-serif-1.0.112-1.fc11.noarch.rpm | ||
| “Droid Serif” font published by “Google”, part of the | | “Droid Serif” font published by “Google”, as part of its “Droid” release (subpackage) | ||
|- | |||
| un-core-fonts-pilgi-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.noarch.rpm | |||
| “Pilgi” font published by the “UN” project, as part of its “UN Core” release (subpackage) | |||
|} | |} | ||
{{:Fonts_SIG_signature}}[[Category:Fonts packaging guideline change proposals|2008-12-22, Naming]] | {{:Fonts_SIG_signature}}[[Category:Fonts packaging guideline change proposals|2008-12-22, Naming]] | ||
[[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]] | |||
Latest revision as of 02:43, 25 February 2009
Abandoned proposal
This proposal was reviewed by FPC on 2009-01-06. FPC felt it didn't try hard enough to achieve distribution-wide naming consistency. A more ambitious and invasive proposal was therefore written that supersedes this page.
This proposal was reviewed by FPC on 2009-01-06. FPC felt it didn't try hard enough to achieve distribution-wide naming consistency. A more ambitious and invasive proposal was therefore written that supersedes this page.
Foreword
This proposal is intended to document font package naming. The current naming has always been implicit in our spec templates(1,2), but experience shows some explicit text would help.
The only actual novelty is the use of foundry names, that some packagers have added by themselves in the past (and thus the naming of our current packages is not consistent). Since other distributions also use foundry names, it has been decided in list and irc discussions that making every font package use them was cleaner than asking their removal in the packages that used them.
Renaming of existing packages that fail this stricter rule will wait for the corresponding policy to be finalised. In the meanwhile getting new package named consistently is a net win.
This is one other bit of the list of package cleanups discussed by the Fonts SIG for the Fedora 11 release.
The change
It consists of the addition one paragraph to our current font policy that should be referenced in Packaging/NamingGuidelines.
Naming
- Fedora font source packages (src.rpm) are named foundryname-fontprojectname-fonts.
- Their eventual non-utility subpackages (nosrc.rpm) are named foundryname-fontprojectname-fonts-fontfamilyname.
- Font package naming uses the lowercase form.
FAQ:
- For Fedora purposes a “foundry” is an entity that publishes a set of fonts with consistent font QA rules. Thus a generic hosting service such as Sourceforge is not a foundry, but the Open Font Library is.
- It is good practice to contract foundryname in a short prefix.
- When foundryname-fontprojectname or fontfamilyname contain the font or fonts affix, it should be skipped to avoid foofont-fonts packages.
- When fontprojectname includes foundryname, it is not necessary to repeat it.
- When fontfamilyname includes fontprojectname or foundryname, it is not necessary to repeat them.
- The use of the fonts suffix is not dependant on the actual number of font files in the package.
When in doubt, ask the mailing list for clarification.
| Package name | Description |
|---|---|
| Source packages (src.rpm) | |
| apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-3.fc11.src.rpm | “Heuristica” font published by Andrey Panov, “apanov” |
| dejavu-fonts-2.27-7.fc11.src.rpm | “DejaVu” fonts of the “DejaVu” project foundry |
| gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-4.fc11.src.rpm | “Didot Classic” font of the Greek Font Society, “gfs”, foundry |
| google-droid-fonts-1.0.112-1.fc11.src.rpm | “Droid” fonts published by “Google” |
| un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.src.rpm | “UN Core” fonts of the “UN” project |
| Binary packages (noarch.rpm) | |
| apanov-heuristica-fonts-20081109-3.fc11.noarch.rpm | “Heuristica” font published by Andrey Panov |
| dejavu-fonts-lgc-sans-mono-2.27-7.fc11.noarch.rpm | “DejaVu LGC Sans Mono” font of the “DejaVu” project, as part of the “DejaVu” release (subpackage) |
| gfs-didot-classic-fonts-20080702-4.fc11.noarch.rpm | “Didot Classic” font of the Greek Font Society |
| google-droid-fonts-serif-1.0.112-1.fc11.noarch.rpm | “Droid Serif” font published by “Google”, as part of its “Droid” release (subpackage) |
| un-core-fonts-pilgi-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.noarch.rpm | “Pilgi” font published by the “UN” project, as part of its “UN Core” release (subpackage) |
Fonts in Fedora
The Fonts SIG takes loving care of Fedora fonts. Please join this special interest group if you are interested in creating, improving, packaging, or just suggesting a font. Any help will be appreciated.
The Fonts SIG takes loving care of Fedora fonts. Please join this special interest group if you are interested in creating, improving, packaging, or just suggesting a font. Any help will be appreciated.