From Fedora Project Wiki
(Split non-obvious items from explict requires) |
(Add a could as recommended by FESCo) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Anything in the spec file which is not obvious should have a comment explaining it. | Anything in the spec file which is not obvious should have a comment explaining it. | ||
Some examples of non-obvious items include (but are not limited to): | Some examples of non-obvious items could include (but are not limited to): | ||
* Some explicit requires | * Some explicit requires | ||
* Changes to optflags | * Changes to optflags | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* Modified tarballs | * Modified tarballs | ||
* Licensing or legal related changes | * Licensing or legal related changes | ||
[[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]] | |||
Latest revision as of 18:01, 20 February 2009
Addition to ReviewGuidelines
SHOULD: Anything in the spec file which is not obvious should have a comment explaining it.
Addition to Packaging Guidelines
Non-Obvious Items in Spec Files
Anything in the spec file which is not obvious should have a comment explaining it.
Some examples of non-obvious items could include (but are not limited to):
- Some explicit requires
- Changes to optflags
- Not using
%configureor make install - Provides/Obsoletes
- Modified tarballs
- Licensing or legal related changes