|
|
| (206 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
| |
|
| {{Anchor|Virtualization}} | | {{Anchor|Virtualization}} |
| | |
|
| |
|
| == Virtualization == | | == Virtualization == |
| In this section, we cover discussion on the @et-mgmnt-tools-list, @fedora-xen-list, @libvirt-list and @ovirt-devel-list of Fedora virtualization technologies. | | In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the |
| | @fedora-virt list. |
|
| |
|
| Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]] | | Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]] |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| === Fedora Virtualization List === | | === Fedora Virtualization List === |
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list]. | | [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list]. |
|
| |
|
| ==== KVM and QEMU Merge in Fedora 11==== | | ==== Virt Status Report ==== |
| After some development delay, the <code>KVM</code> and <code>QEMU</code> package merge
| | [[JustinForbes|Justin Forbes]] |
| feature<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KVM_and_QEMU_merge</ref>
| | posted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00056.html</ref> a Fedora virtualization status report. |
| of Fedora 11 has been marked as
| | Justin pointed out F13 bugs<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_bugs</ref> now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target. |
| accepted by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FESCO</ref>.
| |
| | |
| "Currently, there is both a {{package|qemu}} package and {{package|kvm}} package. The <code>KVM</code> package's source is a fork of the <code>QEMU</code> source, but <code>KVM</code> regularily re-bases to the latest <code>QEMU</code> source and merging of <code>KVM</code> support into the <code>QEMU</code> code base is actively under-way."
| |
|
| |
|
| <references /> | | <references /> |
|
| |
|
| ==== Fedora Virtualization Status Report ==== | | ==== RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity ==== |
| After a few weeks off,
| | Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features<ref>http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/</ref> of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 |
| [[MarkMcLoughlin|Mark McLoughlin]]
| | compared to Fedora 12. |
| reached back into the future and produced an exhaustive status
| |
| report<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-March/msg00068.html</ref>
| |
| covering all the developments in fedora Virtualization for the last month.
| |
| Grab a bowl of popcorn and dig in!
| |
|
| |
|
| <references />
| | [[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]] |
| | | explained<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00040.html</ref> |
| === Fedora Xen List ===
| | "The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind |
| This section contains the discussion happening on the
| | Fedora as you might think. The {{package|libvirt}} mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was |
| [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen fedora-xen list].
| | rebased to be near parity with [[Releases/11|Fedora 11]], and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is |
| | | also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of |
| ==== Success with Experimental Fedora 10 pv_ops dom0 ====
| | kvm-83 and kvm-84." |
| Users are continuing to build experimental kernels with <code>pv_ops</code> dom0<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0</ref> support.
| |
| [[PasiKärkkäinen|Pasi Kärkkäinen]] | |
| was happy to
| |
| report<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/2009-March/msg00071.html</ref>
| |
| success getting a
| |
| "custom Xen <code>pv_ops</code> dom0 <code>kernel</code> working with | |
| <code>virt-install</code> and/or {{package|virt-manager}} on Fedora 10".
| |
| | |
| "I was able to run the following on Fedora 10 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0:"
| |
| * CentOS 5.3 32bit PAE PV domU
| |
| * Fedora 10 32bit PAE PV domU (using <code>virt-install</code> and custom kickstart to force PAE kernel installation to avoid the anaconda BUG<ref>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470905</ref>)
| |
| | |
| Pasi was successful by using:
| |
| * pv_ops dom0 kernel (2.6.29-rc8 or newer) "Compile with <code>CONFIG_HIGHPTE=n</code> since it seems to be broken still"
| |
| * {{package|libvirt}} 0.6.1 and related packages from Fedora 10 updates-testing
| |
| * {{package|xen}} 3.3.1-9 packages from rawhide/F11 rebuilt for F10
| |
| * LVM volumes for domU disks (<code>tap:aio</code> is not yet supported by <code>pv_ops</code> dom0 kernel)
| |
|
| |
|
| <references /> | | <references /> |
|
| |
|
| ==== Yum Repository for Experimental Dom0 Kernels ====
| |
| Since [[Koji]] removes scratch builds after some time,
| |
| [[MichaelYoung|Michael Young]]
| |
| created<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/2009-March/msg00078.html</ref>
| |
| a repository<ref>http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/</ref>
| |
| for the experimental Dom0 capable<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0</ref> <code>kernels</code> he's experimenting with.
| |
|
| |
|
| | ==== ==== |
| <references /> | | <references /> |
|
| |
| === Libvirt List ===
| |
| This section contains the discussion happening on the
| |
| [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list libvir-list].
| |
|
| |
| ==== More Formal libvirt Release Scheduling ====
| |
| After
| |
| [[DanielVeillard|Daniel Veillard]]
| |
| proposed a {{package|libvirt}} 0.6.2 release next week,
| |
| [[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]]
| |
| thought
| |
| <ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-March/msg00435.html</ref>
| |
| the "release schedule has become a little too variable in timeframe and
| |
| quality in recent times."
| |
| (FWN #155<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue155#Release_of_libvirt_0.5.0_and_0.5.1</ref>) and suggested
| |
| * Monthly releases aiming for the 1st of the month.
| |
| * Any non-trivial new feature for release must be reviewed, approved and committed at least 1 week before the release.
| |
|
| |
| [[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]] is also
| |
| "working on an integration test suite, which will
| |
| enable us to run automated tests against individual hypervisor drivers.
| |
| This will help us detect regressions in hypervisor drivers, and more
| |
| importantly let us ensure that all drivers are implementing consistent
| |
| semantics for their APIs."
| |
|
| |
| [[DanielVeillard|Daniel Veillard]]
| |
| tended<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-March/msg00446.html</ref>
| |
| "to agree on the approximate rule of one release every months [sic]
| |
| but I would like to keep this flexible" and offered this schedule for the
| |
| next 2 releases:
| |
|
| |
| * 0.6.2:
| |
| : commit feature freeze: Tuesday 31 Mar
| |
| : expected release date: Friday 3 Apr
| |
|
| |
| * 0.6.3:
| |
| : commit feature freeze: Friday 17 Apr
| |
| : expected release date: Friday 24 Apr
| |
|
| |
| <references />
| |
|
| |
| ==== New Release perl-Sys-Virt 0.2.0 ====
| |
| [[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]]
| |
| announced<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-March/msg00449.html</ref>
| |
| an update of the Perl binding for <code>libvirt</code>, {{package|perl-Sys-Virt}}<ref>http://search.cpan.org/dist/Sys-Virt/</ref>.
| |
|
| |
| '''New features:'''
| |
| * Fix network create API, and UUID lookups
| |
| * Implement storage pool, storage vol, node device, security model, domain events and event loop APIs
| |
| * Improve way constants are exposed to Perl layer
| |
| * Fix horrible memory leak in methods returning a hash
| |
| * Fix integer overflow in APIs using 64-bit ints (aka 'long long')
| |
| * Minimum required libvirt C library for building is 0.6.1
| |
|
| |
| <references />
| |
|
| |
| === oVirt Devel List ===
| |
| This section contains the discussion happening on the
| |
| [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ovirt-devel ovirt-devel list].
| |
|
| |
|
| ==== ==== | | ==== ==== |
| <references /> | | <references /> |
libvirt