(Add link to alternate proposal) |
|||
(19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== GConf XML schema registration == | == GConf XML schema registration == | ||
Currently, when a package requires an XML schema it is installed in <code>%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/<code> (such as <code>gcalctool</code> in the following example), <code>gconftool-2</code> should be run after the package is installed/uninstalled in FC4 or later. If the package is upgraded, the existing schema is deleted and removed from the XML schema tree (registry) and then the package provided schema is installed and registered. This is required so that the program(s) have a default configuration and for any custom options a user may wish to edit with using <code>gconf-editor</code>. | Currently, when a package requires an XML schema it is installed in <code>%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/</code> (such as <code>gcalctool</code> in the following example), <code>gconftool-2</code> should be run after the package is installed/uninstalled in FC4 or later. If the package is upgraded, the existing schema is deleted and removed from the XML schema tree (registry) and then the package provided schema is installed and registered. This is required so that the program(s) have a default configuration and for any custom options a user may wish to edit with using <code>gconf-editor</code>. | ||
Note that this is required for any package that uses GConf for its configuration that must register its configurations into the registry. | Note that this is required for any package that uses GConf for its configuration that must register its configurations into the registry. | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
#%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gcalctool.schemas | #%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gcalctool.schemas | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
<BR> | |||
* rpm-scriptlets are generated by the macros in %pre, %preun, %posttrans | * rpm-scriptlets are generated by the macros in %pre, %preun, %posttrans | ||
* We do not need to explicitly include the schema files in the %file section. | * We do not need to explicitly include the schema files in the %file section. | ||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
The following macros are available: | The following macros are available: | ||
<code>gconf_schemas_prereq</code> - This macro just looks for some pre-requirements<BR> | <code>gconf_schemas_prereq</code> - This macro just looks for some pre-requirements.<BR> | ||
<code>find_gconf_schemas</code> - Searches the package during build time in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/gconf/schemas and builds a list of them and creates rpm-scriptlets in the process for each schema file found.<BR> | <code>find_gconf_schemas</code> - Searches the package during build time in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/gconf/schemas and builds a list of them and creates rpm-scriptlets in the process for each schema file found.<BR> | ||
<code>def_gconf_schemas</code> - Define a schema, set file permissions for use with %file section, create %pre, %preun, %posttrans rpm-scriptlets<BR> | <code>def_gconf_schemas</code> - Define a schema, set file permissions for use with %file section, create %pre, %preun, %posttrans rpm-scriptlets.<BR> | ||
<code>add_gconf_schemas</code> - Creates %pre section setup up comparing existing schema with new one, creates uninstall scriptlet for %preun section to remove schema from registry<BR> | <code>add_gconf_schemas</code> - Creates %pre section setup up comparing existing schema with new one, creates uninstall scriptlet for %preun section to remove schema from registry.<BR> | ||
<code>end_gconf_schemas | <code>end_gconf_schemas</code> - You must call this macro if you do not use the <code>find_gconf_schemas</code> macro. This macro does a compare list against schemas that need to be registered in a %posttrans scriptlet and which ones need to be uninstalled in a %preun scriptlet.<BR> | ||
== The Macro file macro.gconf2 (original) == | |||
* License from author is LGPL v2.1+ from email conversation: | |||
"I did not assign any special license to macros.gconf2. | |||
I think that if not declared otherwise, rpm source files have the same | |||
license as the package itself. In case of gconf2 it is: | |||
GPL v2 or later; LGPL v2.1 or later | |||
So feel free to consider it as LGPL v2.1 or later. | |||
I think, that LGPL should allow to use them in proprietary GNOME | |||
packages, exactly as gconf2 license allows. | |||
Maybe it would be good to mention the license explicitly." | |||
- Stanislav Brabec | |||
<pre> | |||
# | |||
# RPM macros for gconf applications. | |||
# | |||
# (c) 2006-2007 SUSE LINUX | |||
# Author: Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec@suse.cz> | |||
# | |||
# Usage: | |||
# | |||
# Preamble: | |||
# %gconf_schemas_prereq | |||
# | |||
# %install | |||
# ... | |||
# %find_gconf_schemas | |||
# or | |||
# %def_gconf_schemas subpackage1 | |||
# %add_gconf_schemas schemas_name1 | |||
# %add_gconf_schemas schemas_name2 | |||
# %def_gconf_schemas subpackage2 | |||
# %add_gconf_schemas schemas_name3 | |||
# %add_gconf_schemas schemas_name4 | |||
# %end_gconf_schemas | |||
# schemas names are without path and suffix | |||
# | |||
# %pre -f %{name}.schemas_pre | |||
# | |||
# %preun -f %{name}.schemas_preun | |||
# | |||
# %posttrans -f %{name}.schemas_posttrans | |||
# | |||
# %files -f %{name}.schemas_list | |||
# or | |||
# %files -f subpackage.schemas_list | |||
# | |||
# | |||
# In case of more -f needed for one %files: | |||
# | |||
# %install | |||
# ... | |||
# %find_gconf_schemas | |||
# %find_lang %{name} | |||
# cat %{name}.schemas_list %{name}.lang >%{name}.lst | |||
# | |||
# %files -f %{name}.lst | |||
# | |||
%gconf_schemas_prereq PreReq: /usr/bin/gconftool-2 coreutils diffutils | |||
%end_gconf_schemas() \ | |||
echo 'if test "x$UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES" != "x"; then\ | |||
usr/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule $UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES >/dev/null\ | |||
rm -f $UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES\ | |||
fi\ | |||
if test "x$INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES" != "x"; then\ | |||
usr/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule $INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES >/dev/null\ | |||
fi\ | |||
rmdir etc/gconf/schemas/outdated 2>/dev/null || true' >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_posttrans\ | |||
echo ' rmdir etc/gconf/schemas/outdated 2>/dev/null || true\ | |||
fi' >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_preun\ | |||
%{nil} | |||
%def_gconf_schemas() \ | |||
if test -n "$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME" ; then\ | |||
%end_gconf_schemas\ | |||
fi\ | |||
GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME=%1\ | |||
echo '%defattr (644, root, root, 755)' >%1.schemas_list\ | |||
echo 'mkdir -p etc/gconf/schemas/outdated' >%1.schemas_pre\ | |||
echo 'export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`usr/bin/gconftool-2 --get-default-source`\ | |||
INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES=\ | |||
UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES=' >%1.schemas_posttrans\ | |||
echo 'if test "$1" == "0"; then\ | |||
if test -x usr/bin/gconftool-2 ; then\ | |||
export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`usr/bin/gconftool-2 --get-default-source`\ | |||
fi' >%1.schemas_preun\ | |||
%{nil} | |||
%_add_gconf_schemas() \ | |||
echo $SCHEMAS >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_list\ | |||
echo "if test -f ${SCHEMAS#/} ; then\ | |||
ln -f ${SCHEMAS#/} etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/\ | |||
fi" >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_pre\ | |||
echo "if test -f etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/}; then\ | |||
cmp --quiet etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/} ${SCHEMAS#/}\ | |||
if test \\\$? != 0; then\ | |||
UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES=\\\"\\\$UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/}\\\"\ | |||
INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES=\\\"\\\$INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES ${SCHEMAS#/}\\\"\ | |||
else\ | |||
rm -f etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/}\ | |||
fi\ | |||
else\ | |||
INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES=\\\"\\\$INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES ${SCHEMAS#/}\\\"\ | |||
fi" >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_posttrans\ | |||
echo " if test -x usr/bin/gconftool-2 ; then\ | |||
if test -f etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/} ; then\ | |||
usr/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/} >/dev/null\ | |||
elif test -f ${SCHEMAS#/} ; then\ | |||
usr/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule ${SCHEMAS#/} >/dev/null\ | |||
fi\ | |||
fi\ | |||
rm -f etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/}" >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_preun\ | |||
%{nil} | |||
%add_gconf_schemas() \ | |||
SCHEMAS=/etc/gconf/schemas/%1.schemas\ | |||
%_add_gconf_schemas\ | |||
%{nil} | |||
%find_gconf_schemas() \ | |||
test -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/gconf/schemas\ | |||
%def_gconf_schemas %{name}\ | |||
for SCHEMAS in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/gconf/schemas/*.schemas ; do\ | |||
test -f $SCHEMAS\ | |||
SCHEMAS=${SCHEMAS#$RPM_BUILD_ROOT}\ | |||
%_add_gconf_schemas\ | |||
done\ | |||
%end_gconf_schemas\ | |||
%{nil} | |||
</pre> | |||
== Discussion == | |||
This is a bit complex and adds several new things. I'd like to break up the changes and make sure that what we end up is both faster and as simple as possible. Here's the changes I see: | |||
1. Use %posttrans | |||
2. generate scriptlets in macros | |||
3. Generate Requires() in macros | |||
4. Compare gconf schemas and don't run gconftool if no changes were made | |||
Let's take these one at a time | |||
=== %posttrans === | |||
I don't think this adds any speed as we still have to run gconftool-2 the same number of times over the same number of new schemas. The window for things to go wonky is larger if we wait until %posttrans to run the gconf update instead of running it in %post. It's possible that a gconf using app would be needed later in the transaction, although the fact that it needed the schema installed to function correctly is technically a bug. In long running updates, a person invoking an application that's been upgraded before the update has finished could also encounter this race. | |||
=== Generate scriptlets in macros === | |||
I like the idea of getting complexity out of people's sight but I recently | |||
helped package a font and discovered there's costs to using macros. It really | |||
obfuscates what the code is doing. | |||
Also, when macros change, packages that make use of them have to be rebuilt to | |||
pick up the changes. We should figure out how to track what's been rebuilt and | |||
what hasn't to make this better. | |||
Update: This will do for finding the schema including packages: | |||
<pre> | |||
repoquery --whatprovides "/etc/gconf/schemas/*" |sort |uniq |wc -l | |||
</pre> | |||
Note: One case that this doesn't catch is packages that used to provide schemas but no longer do. | |||
=== Generate Requires in macros === | |||
I'd rather do something like this: | |||
<pre> | |||
Requires(pre): %{gconf-schema-post-requires} | |||
</pre> | |||
But I could be persuaded that it's better to hide it all. | |||
Note that the current macro isn't complete. You need to have separate entries | |||
for each of %pre, %preun, and %posttrans. | |||
Also note, <code>coreutils</code> and <code>diffutils</code> are in our buildsys-build package so the Prereq is really just the equivalent of <code>Requires(pre): GConf2</code> which doesn't add that much value. | |||
=== Compare gconf schemas === | |||
This looks like the big speed win. If we could reduce the complexity and just | |||
do this that would be a good thing. We'd want to know what the costs are of | |||
enhancing performance though. How much more complex? Does the window for | |||
interrupted rpm transactions get bigger or the results of that get worse? | |||
=== Alternate Proposal === | |||
Here's an alternate proposal based on the above criticisms: | |||
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GConf_Scriptlets_(draft) | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]] |
Latest revision as of 13:26, 12 May 2009
Changelog
0.1: First go at this
Existing Guideline
GConf XML schema registration
Currently, when a package requires an XML schema it is installed in %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/
(such as gcalctool
in the following example), gconftool-2
should be run after the package is installed/uninstalled in FC4 or later. If the package is upgraded, the existing schema is deleted and removed from the XML schema tree (registry) and then the package provided schema is installed and registered. This is required so that the program(s) have a default configuration and for any custom options a user may wish to edit with using gconf-editor
.
Note that this is required for any package that uses GConf for its configuration that must register its configurations into the registry.
%find_lang gcalctool --with-gnome %post scrollkeeper-update -q export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gcalctool.schemas > /dev/null || : %pre if [ "$1" -gt 1 ]; then export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gcalctool.schemas > /dev/null || : fi %preun if [ "$1" -eq 0 ]; then export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gcalctool.schemas > /dev/null || : fi
Proposal
Motivations for changing the existing guideline:
- Speed up package install/upgrade. Right now it is painful when preforming Anaconda installs and yum updates for new packages, it takes a long time for the XML schemas to register and this is done for each GConf related package and each sub-package as well.
- gconftool-2 currently runs on every package install/upgrade, which is very inefficient. When preforming an upgrade of a package using the existing guidelines, there is no comparing of the existing schema and this needlessly removes and re-registers with an unchanged schema, slowing down Anaconda installs and yum updates.
New GConf registration
Using OpenSuSE's existing macros.gconf2 with minor modifications (as needed) we can dramatically improve install and upgrade times for our users. Upgrading existing RPMs will have their schemas compared and if they are the same, no changes are done to the user's system configuration registry. If there are changes, then the schema is registered as normal within %posttrans section.
Since schema registrations are usually not dependant on other packages being installed (and probably should not be) we are able to push these registrations to a %posttrans section.
Typical example of how the new macros work:
Name: gcalctool ... ... ... Requires(post): GConf2 ... %gconf_schemas_prereq [This basically is just Requires(pre): GConf2 coreutils diffutils ] %install ... # Find GConf XML Schemas %find_gconf_schemas %find_lang gcalctool --with-gnome cat %{name}.schemas_list %{name}.lang >%{name}.lst %pre -f %{name}.schemas_pre %preun -f %{name}.schemas_preun %posttrans -f %{name}.schemas_posttrans #%files -f gcalctool.lang %files -f %{names}.lst #%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/gcalctool.schemas
- rpm-scriptlets are generated by the macros in %pre, %preun, %posttrans
- We do not need to explicitly include the schema files in the %file section.
Description of new GConf macros
The following macros are available:
gconf_schemas_prereq
- This macro just looks for some pre-requirements.
find_gconf_schemas
- Searches the package during build time in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/gconf/schemas and builds a list of them and creates rpm-scriptlets in the process for each schema file found.
def_gconf_schemas
- Define a schema, set file permissions for use with %file section, create %pre, %preun, %posttrans rpm-scriptlets.
add_gconf_schemas
- Creates %pre section setup up comparing existing schema with new one, creates uninstall scriptlet for %preun section to remove schema from registry.
end_gconf_schemas
- You must call this macro if you do not use the find_gconf_schemas
macro. This macro does a compare list against schemas that need to be registered in a %posttrans scriptlet and which ones need to be uninstalled in a %preun scriptlet.
The Macro file macro.gconf2 (original)
- License from author is LGPL v2.1+ from email conversation:
"I did not assign any special license to macros.gconf2.
I think that if not declared otherwise, rpm source files have the same license as the package itself. In case of gconf2 it is: GPL v2 or later; LGPL v2.1 or later
So feel free to consider it as LGPL v2.1 or later.
I think, that LGPL should allow to use them in proprietary GNOME packages, exactly as gconf2 license allows.
Maybe it would be good to mention the license explicitly."
- Stanislav Brabec
# # RPM macros for gconf applications. # # (c) 2006-2007 SUSE LINUX # Author: Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec@suse.cz> # # Usage: # # Preamble: # %gconf_schemas_prereq # # %install # ... # %find_gconf_schemas # or # %def_gconf_schemas subpackage1 # %add_gconf_schemas schemas_name1 # %add_gconf_schemas schemas_name2 # %def_gconf_schemas subpackage2 # %add_gconf_schemas schemas_name3 # %add_gconf_schemas schemas_name4 # %end_gconf_schemas # schemas names are without path and suffix # # %pre -f %{name}.schemas_pre # # %preun -f %{name}.schemas_preun # # %posttrans -f %{name}.schemas_posttrans # # %files -f %{name}.schemas_list # or # %files -f subpackage.schemas_list # # # In case of more -f needed for one %files: # # %install # ... # %find_gconf_schemas # %find_lang %{name} # cat %{name}.schemas_list %{name}.lang >%{name}.lst # # %files -f %{name}.lst # %gconf_schemas_prereq PreReq: /usr/bin/gconftool-2 coreutils diffutils %end_gconf_schemas() \ echo 'if test "x$UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES" != "x"; then\ usr/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule $UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES >/dev/null\ rm -f $UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES\ fi\ if test "x$INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES" != "x"; then\ usr/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule $INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES >/dev/null\ fi\ rmdir etc/gconf/schemas/outdated 2>/dev/null || true' >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_posttrans\ echo ' rmdir etc/gconf/schemas/outdated 2>/dev/null || true\ fi' >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_preun\ %{nil} %def_gconf_schemas() \ if test -n "$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME" ; then\ %end_gconf_schemas\ fi\ GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME=%1\ echo '%defattr (644, root, root, 755)' >%1.schemas_list\ echo 'mkdir -p etc/gconf/schemas/outdated' >%1.schemas_pre\ echo 'export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`usr/bin/gconftool-2 --get-default-source`\ INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES=\ UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES=' >%1.schemas_posttrans\ echo 'if test "$1" == "0"; then\ if test -x usr/bin/gconftool-2 ; then\ export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`usr/bin/gconftool-2 --get-default-source`\ fi' >%1.schemas_preun\ %{nil} %_add_gconf_schemas() \ echo $SCHEMAS >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_list\ echo "if test -f ${SCHEMAS#/} ; then\ ln -f ${SCHEMAS#/} etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/\ fi" >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_pre\ echo "if test -f etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/}; then\ cmp --quiet etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/} ${SCHEMAS#/}\ if test \\\$? != 0; then\ UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES=\\\"\\\$UNINSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/}\\\"\ INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES=\\\"\\\$INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES ${SCHEMAS#/}\\\"\ else\ rm -f etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/}\ fi\ else\ INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES=\\\"\\\$INSTALL_SCHEMA_FILES ${SCHEMAS#/}\\\"\ fi" >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_posttrans\ echo " if test -x usr/bin/gconftool-2 ; then\ if test -f etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/} ; then\ usr/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/} >/dev/null\ elif test -f ${SCHEMAS#/} ; then\ usr/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule ${SCHEMAS#/} >/dev/null\ fi\ fi\ rm -f etc/gconf/schemas/outdated/${SCHEMAS#/etc/gconf/schemas/}" >>$GCONF_SCHEMAS_NAME.schemas_preun\ %{nil} %add_gconf_schemas() \ SCHEMAS=/etc/gconf/schemas/%1.schemas\ %_add_gconf_schemas\ %{nil} %find_gconf_schemas() \ test -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/gconf/schemas\ %def_gconf_schemas %{name}\ for SCHEMAS in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/gconf/schemas/*.schemas ; do\ test -f $SCHEMAS\ SCHEMAS=${SCHEMAS#$RPM_BUILD_ROOT}\ %_add_gconf_schemas\ done\ %end_gconf_schemas\ %{nil}
Discussion
This is a bit complex and adds several new things. I'd like to break up the changes and make sure that what we end up is both faster and as simple as possible. Here's the changes I see:
1. Use %posttrans 2. generate scriptlets in macros 3. Generate Requires() in macros 4. Compare gconf schemas and don't run gconftool if no changes were made
Let's take these one at a time
%posttrans
I don't think this adds any speed as we still have to run gconftool-2 the same number of times over the same number of new schemas. The window for things to go wonky is larger if we wait until %posttrans to run the gconf update instead of running it in %post. It's possible that a gconf using app would be needed later in the transaction, although the fact that it needed the schema installed to function correctly is technically a bug. In long running updates, a person invoking an application that's been upgraded before the update has finished could also encounter this race.
Generate scriptlets in macros
I like the idea of getting complexity out of people's sight but I recently helped package a font and discovered there's costs to using macros. It really obfuscates what the code is doing.
Also, when macros change, packages that make use of them have to be rebuilt to pick up the changes. We should figure out how to track what's been rebuilt and what hasn't to make this better.
Update: This will do for finding the schema including packages:
repoquery --whatprovides "/etc/gconf/schemas/*" |sort |uniq |wc -l
Note: One case that this doesn't catch is packages that used to provide schemas but no longer do.
Generate Requires in macros
I'd rather do something like this:
Requires(pre): %{gconf-schema-post-requires}
But I could be persuaded that it's better to hide it all.
Note that the current macro isn't complete. You need to have separate entries for each of %pre, %preun, and %posttrans.
Also note, coreutils
and diffutils
are in our buildsys-build package so the Prereq is really just the equivalent of Requires(pre): GConf2
which doesn't add that much value.
Compare gconf schemas
This looks like the big speed win. If we could reduce the complexity and just do this that would be a good thing. We'd want to know what the costs are of enhancing performance though. How much more complex? Does the window for interrupted rpm transactions get bigger or the results of that get worse?
Alternate Proposal
Here's an alternate proposal based on the above criticisms: