From Fedora Project Wiki
m (moved Board/Meetings/2007-10-09 to Meeting:Board meeting 2007-10-09: Move to Meeting: namespace) |
(Add category) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* Releasing F8 ISOs the same as we have with previous releases. | * Releasing F8 ISOs the same as we have with previous releases. | ||
* Revisit for F9 based on the strength of the Fedora PPC developer community, and the progress being made in support of Secondary Architectures. | * Revisit for F9 based on the strength of the Fedora PPC developer community, and the progress being made in support of Secondary Architectures. | ||
[[Category:Board meetings]] | |||
Latest revision as of 13:05, 22 May 2009
Fedora Project Board Meeting :: Tuesday 2007-10-09
Roll Call
Attendees: Chris Aillon, Steve Dickson, Bill Nottingham, Matt Domsch, Karsten Wade, Max Spevack, Chris Blizzard, Jef Spaleta, Dennis Gilmore, and John Poelstra
Regrets: Seth Vidal
Spec File Licenses
- Red Hat Legal says they should be as open and licensed just like everything else
- Choice of license is either "same as the package itself" or something extremely permissive like MIT/X11.
Google Start page
- Things are moving forward with Fedora's previous requests being honored
- Agreement has not yet been signed.
PPC
- Releasing F8 ISOs the same as we have with previous releases.
- Revisit for F9 based on the strength of the Fedora PPC developer community, and the progress being made in support of Secondary Architectures.