From Fedora Project Wiki
(adding question about why custom links v. natural language and there already links.) |
m (Add comment) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I see that there are custom links for each section, which must be a bit more of a challenge to define and maintain than relying upon the natural language links that MediaWiki makes for us already. I imagine there is a more valuable reason to do it this way? FWIW, I <3 the idea of having the link in the first place, very useful. I just reckon it would be easier and more consistent to use the existing link tools? --[[User:Quaid|Quaid]] 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC) | I see that there are custom links for each section, which must be a bit more of a challenge to define and maintain than relying upon the natural language links that MediaWiki makes for us already. I imagine there is a more valuable reason to do it this way? FWIW, I <3 the idea of having the link in the first place, very useful. I just reckon it would be easier and more consistent to use the existing link tools? --[[User:Quaid|Quaid]] 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
* Adam can probably speak more to the point, but I suspect it was more important to have a consistent format for entries on the page. Your suggestion might make sense for future Common Bugs pages. Alternatively, I was looking into a {{CommonBug}} template that contributors could use which would handle proper formatting for them -- [[User:jlaska]] 13:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:44, 15 June 2009
I see that there are custom links for each section, which must be a bit more of a challenge to define and maintain than relying upon the natural language links that MediaWiki makes for us already. I imagine there is a more valuable reason to do it this way? FWIW, I <3 the idea of having the link in the first place, very useful. I just reckon it would be easier and more consistent to use the existing link tools? --Quaid 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- Adam can probably speak more to the point, but I suspect it was more important to have a consistent format for entries on the page. Your suggestion might make sense for future Common Bugs pages. Alternatively, I was looking into a Template:CommonBug template that contributors could use which would handle proper formatting for them -- User:jlaska 13:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)