From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
(move questions to here) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=== Background === | === Background === | ||
In the present situation, Spins must take all of their content from the official Fedora repositories. | |||
=== Questions for Spins and the Spins SIG === | |||
Given the present situation: | |||
# Has any Spin found the present situation unduly restrictive? | |||
## If so, how specifically? | |||
# Has any Spin found they cannot address their target audience properly? | |||
## If so, in what way? | |||
## Is the root problem that all packages must be in the official repositories? | |||
# How are you addressing this today? | |||
# How would you like to address this in the future? | |||
# Are the resources you would need readily available? | |||
## If not, what would you need to properly address this? | |||
=== Possible Solutions === | === Possible Solutions === | ||
=== Risk/Benefit === | === Risk/Benefit === | ||
Revision as of 14:36, 8 February 2010
Can Spins/SIGS or Fedora remixes change the code enough to meet their goals?
Background
In the present situation, Spins must take all of their content from the official Fedora repositories.
Questions for Spins and the Spins SIG
Given the present situation:
- Has any Spin found the present situation unduly restrictive?
- If so, how specifically?
- Has any Spin found they cannot address their target audience properly?
- If so, in what way?
- Is the root problem that all packages must be in the official repositories?
- How are you addressing this today?
- How would you like to address this in the future?
- Are the resources you would need readily available?
- If not, what would you need to properly address this?