|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = Can Spins/SIGS or Fedora remixes define their own target audience? = | | = Can Spins/SIGS or Fedora remixes define their own target audience? = |
|
| |
|
| === Background ===
| | This content has moved to: |
|
| |
|
| The Board has been working on defining a target audience for Fedora. In response to this, some people feel that Fedora should allow sub-groups to define their own target audience. Or even more strongly that Spins/SIGs should be the '''only''' groups defining target audience; in other words, the Board should not be defining one. An example mail supporting this position is [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2009-October/007430.html this mail] from Toshio.
| | [[User:Mdomsch/SWG_Spins]] |
| | |
| However, the potential conflict between a Board target audience and a SIG target audience is still theoretical. No SIG appears to have explicitly disagreed with the "working" target audience proposal.
| |
| | |
| === Possible Solutions ===
| |
| # Board sets target audience broadly, spins tailor to a subset thereof.
| |
| # Board sets target audience broadly, spins tailor to either a subset thereof, or to additional audiences outside that scope so long as there are no conflicts.
| |
| # Board does not set target audience, leaves it to each Spin to set their specific target audience.
| |
| ## requires spins to be much more than consumers of Fedora content.
| |
| ## audience of some spins may overlap. That's OK.
| |
| ## audience of some spins may technically conflict. How to resolve conflicts? Spins SIG -> FESCo -> Board.
| |
| | |
| | |
| === Risk/Benefit ===
| |
|
| |
|
| [[Category:Strategic working group]] | | [[Category:Strategic working group]] |
Latest revision as of 19:44, 15 March 2010
Can Spins/SIGS or Fedora remixes define their own target audience?
This content has moved to:
User:Mdomsch/SWG_Spins