From Fedora Project Wiki
(move from top page)
 
(split, close out two)
Line 11: Line 11:
|-
|-
| [[Rufscript fonts]]            || [[rhbug:467507|467507]] || 2008-10-17 || as above, still waiting upstream ||
| [[Rufscript fonts]]            || [[rhbug:467507|467507]] || 2008-10-17 || as above, still waiting upstream ||
|-
| [[Epigrafica fonts]]            || [[rhbug:484057|484057]] || 2009-02-04 || 2009-02-04 reviewed, needinfo. Second review started as [[rhbug:492900|492900]] on 2009-03-30 but closed dup, 2009-03-31 || Grab spec from [[rhbug:492900|492900]] if original packager has disappeared.
|-
| [[Breip fonts]]                || [[rhbug:485542|485542]] || 2009-02-13 || 2009-02-14 reviewed, needinfo || stalled (disappeared new packager?) Epigrafica taken by same person
|-
|-
| [[Chisholm Banana Peels fonts]] || [[rhbug:486680|486680]] || 2009-02-20 || 2009-07-15 CLOSED WONTFIX || Should be moved back to wishlist
| [[Chisholm Banana Peels fonts]] || [[rhbug:486680|486680]] || 2009-02-20 || 2009-07-15 CLOSED WONTFIX || Should be moved back to wishlist
Line 33: Line 29:
|}
|}


[2010-02-17] I'm going to email the packager of Epigrafica and Breip to see if he is still interested in continuing these.
== Old reviews ==
 
Font reviews that have definitely stalled are moved from above to here. Looking at old review requests in Bugzilla might show that an old spec file might be still on the original packager's web site, and that might prove to be a reasonable starting point for a new attempt.
 
{|
! Page
! Review request
! Requested
! Last activity
! Should do
|-
| [[Epigrafica fonts]]            || [[rhbug:484057|484057]] || 2009-02-04 || 2009-02-04 reviewed, needinfo. Second review started as [[rhbug:492900|492900]] on 2009-03-30 but closed dup, 2009-03-31 || 2010-02-17 Confirmed that original packager does not want to complete this (email).
|-
| [[Breip fonts]]                || [[rhbug:485542|485542]] || 2009-02-13 || 2009-02-14 reviewed, needinfo || 2010-02-17 Confirmed that original packager does not want to complete this (email).
|}

Revision as of 12:14, 18 February 2010

Status of fonts in category In-progress fonts, in order of age

Page Review request Requested Last activity Should do
Perizia fonts 457709 2008-08-04 2010-01-11 still waiting new upstream website
Rufscript fonts 467507 2008-10-17 as above, still waiting upstream
Chisholm Banana Peels fonts 486680 2009-02-20 2009-07-15 CLOSED WONTFIX Should be moved back to wishlist
M+ fonts 2009-10-14 categorised as in-progress, but no review request in wiki
Gdouros Akkadian fonts 532231 2009-10-31 all complete update wiki (done), close review bug
Gdouros Symbola 532819 2009-11-03 cvs done, but no builds update wiki (done), close review bug when built
TLOMT Sniglet fonts 536718 2009-11-10 2009-11-13 reviewed. nothing since packager should be pinged
Paratype PT Sans fonts 556308 2010-01-17 2010-02-15 cvs done in progress
Ubuntu title fonts 564466 2010-02-12 awaiting review
GFS Göschen fonts 564557 2010-02-13 reviewed, in progress

Old reviews

Font reviews that have definitely stalled are moved from above to here. Looking at old review requests in Bugzilla might show that an old spec file might be still on the original packager's web site, and that might prove to be a reasonable starting point for a new attempt.

Page Review request Requested Last activity Should do
Epigrafica fonts 484057 2009-02-04 2009-02-04 reviewed, needinfo. Second review started as 492900 on 2009-03-30 but closed dup, 2009-03-31 2010-02-17 Confirmed that original packager does not want to complete this (email).
Breip fonts 485542 2009-02-13 2009-02-14 reviewed, needinfo 2010-02-17 Confirmed that original packager does not want to complete this (email).
Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frixxon/Fonts_in_progress&oldid=154215"