From Fedora Project Wiki
(Linked to the latest version of Fedora) |
(→Contacts: Changed a mistaken org to net when referring to freenode) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Email: [mailto:dafrito@gmail.com dafrito@gmail.com] | Email: [mailto:dafrito@gmail.com dafrito@gmail.com] | ||
You can also find me on IRC. My nickname there is, not surprisingly, <code>dafrito</code>. I frequent many of the various Fedora channels on <code>irc.freenode. | You can also find me on IRC. My nickname there is, not surprisingly, <code>dafrito</code>. I frequent many of the various Fedora channels on <code>irc.freenode.net</code>, such as: | ||
* <code>#fedora</code> | * <code>#fedora</code> | ||
* <code>#fedora-qa</code> | * <code>#fedora-qa</code> | ||
Revision as of 18:05, 21 June 2010
My name is Aaron Faanes. I am a Fedora 13 user, occasional Wiki contributor, and frequent hacker. See my homepage.
Contacts
Email: dafrito@gmail.com
You can also find me on IRC. My nickname there is, not surprisingly, dafrito. I frequent many of the various Fedora channels on irc.freenode.net, such as:
#fedora#fedora-qa#fedora-devel#fedora-bugzappers
Notable pages
- User:Dafrito/Draft_proventesters_instructions lots of editing. Thanks to User:Adamwill for his draft and feedback.
- Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers needs some love
Thoughts
- Shouldn't Fedora link to an article on Fedora, rather than the infrastructure page?
- It'd also be cool to have pages for all versions of Fedora, with a template used to describe each.
- "updates-testing" and "Test Updates" are used interchangeably, which I don't believe should be the case. "Test Updates" is a natural name which succinctly describes its purpose. "updates-testing" is the technical name that is used by machines. This dual-naming scheme is familiar to the common and scientific names given to animals, like Canis lupus referring to a wolf, and I think the expectations for which to use for animal names should apply here.
- I really like the headers for Wiki pages here. They're very nice looking. My only problem is that they imply a gated community; QA pages seem to be 'owned' by QA. This is reinforced by the fact that they're under the QA/ namespace. It seems like there could be a better solution for this sort of thing, like making these headers be footers, like a decorated Wiki category.