|
|
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| <references/> | | <references/> |
|
| |
|
| === Three greatest successes in Linux world 2011 === | | === Fedora 16 - Freies Magazin === |
|
| |
|
| [[User:Sundaram|Rahul Sundaram]] posted<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2011-December/014160.html</ref>: | | [[User:Vinz|Vinzenz Vietzke]] posted<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2012-January/014167.html</ref>: |
|
| |
|
| "Fedora produced two released this year, same as OpenSuSE and Ubuntu | | "German free web magazine "Freies Magazin" has a whole round up on Fedora 16." |
| And both of them were lovely from my point of view. Fedora 15 was the
| |
| first distribution to feature GNOME3 as default desktop environment. And
| |
| it was already awesome, even though not without a glitch. Fedora 16
| |
| became even better. What is about Fedora KDE? As I have written, Fedora
| |
| 15 KDE was very good, and Fedora 16 KDE was even better."
| |
|
| |
|
| The full discussion thread is available<ref>http://linuxblog.darkduck.com/2011/12/three-greatest-successes-in-linux-world.html</ref>. | | The full article, in German, is available<ref>http://www.freiesmagazin.de/freiesMagazin-2012-01</ref>. |
| | |
| <references/>
| |
| | |
| === 4 security features in Fedora 16 ===
| |
| | |
| [[User:Sundaram|Rahul Sundaram]] posted<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2011-December/014161.html</ref>:
| |
| | |
| "The security features in Fedora make it one of my favorite Linux
| |
| distributions. And that is partly why it is in my list of the top 6 KDE
| |
| distributions of 2011, even though it takes some tweaking to get it to
| |
| the it just works state. I will take the security advantages of an
| |
| operating system over any user-friendliness weaknesses, provided those
| |
| user-friendliness weaknesses are not show stoppers."
| |
| | |
| The full post is available<ref>http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2011/12/13/4-security-features-in-fedora-16/</ref>.
| |
| | |
| <references/>
| |
| | |
| === Interview: Harish Pillay, Global Community and Technology Architect, Red Hat Inc ===
| |
| | |
| [[User:Sundaram|Rahul Sundaram]] posted<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2011-December/014162.html</ref>:
| |
| | |
| "When you design something or build something with security in mind, you
| |
| are always cognizant of the fact that you can have ten measures and if
| |
| everything works fine, that's great. But on the other side, the other
| |
| person needs to succeed just once! Whatever ten things you have that is
| |
| successful, is done away with this one failure. Well that is the story
| |
| in the proprietary perspective. In the open source perspective, | |
| everything that we build is completely transparent. Everybody knows what
| |
| we are building."
| |
| | |
| The full post is available<ref>http://devworks.thinkdigit.com/Features/Interview-Harish-Pillay-Global-Community-and-Technology_8152/0.html</ref>.
| |
| | |
| <references/>
| |
| | |
| === Kororaa Linux 16 - A Fedora++ Distribution ===
| |
| | |
| [[User:Sundaram|Rahul Sundaram]] posted<ref>http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/2011-December/014163.html</ref>:
| |
| | |
| "To get a better overview of Kororaa Linux, the ideas behind it, what it
| |
| includes and why, check their web page. My take on it is this - if you
| |
| have looked at Fedora before, and you didn't want to use it because of
| |
| the difficulty and tedium of getting a lot of common non-FOSS packages
| |
| installed, then you should take a look at Kororaa. Of course, if you are
| |
| a FOSS-purist, you are likely to think that Kororaa is an abomination."
| |
| | |
| The full article is available<ref>http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/jamies-mostly-linux-stuff-10006480/kororaa-linux-16-a-fedora-distribution-10025052/</ref>.
| |
|
| |
|
| <references/> | | <references/> |
