From Fedora Project Wiki
(→‎Triage Check List: fix up list for MW)
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
== Going Deeper ==
== Going Deeper ==
* Understanding the differences between [[BugsAndFeatureRequests|  Bugs and Features]] .
* Understanding the differences between [[BugsAndFeatureRequests|  Bugs and Features]] .
* Bug state flow: [[BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow|  Bug Lifecycle]]  
* Bug state flow: [[BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow|  Bug Lifecycle]]
* Hints for doing [[KernelBugTriage| kernel bug triage]]  
* Understanding things that [[BugZappers/UnderstandingBugzilla|  Bugzilla does automatically]]  
* Understanding things that [[BugZappers/UnderstandingBugzilla|  Bugzilla does automatically]]  
----
----
[[Category:BugTriage]]
[[Category:BugTriage]]

Revision as of 14:37, 21 June 2008

Triage Check List

Here is a check list of regular things to check for:

  1. Reviewing bugs in a states of NEW
    • changing them to assigned if sufficient information is present to reproduce or fix the bug
    • changing the status to NEEDINFO if insufficient information is present
  2. Reviewing bugs in a states of of NEEDINFO greater than thirty (30) days
    • Close them if the NEEDINFO request has not be addressed
  3. Is the bug a duplicate?
    • This is the most common type
    • Is this bug is a duplicate of a previous solved or unsolved bug?
    • See Finding Duplicates for more information on the master art of finding duplicates
  4. Does the bug need more information from the original reporter?
    • Is enough information present about the reporter's system?
    • Are clear instructions present about how to reproduce the bug?
    • Has the reporter included sufficient troubleshooting information or error logs?
    • Are there attached screenshots for GUI bugs?
  5. Is the reported bug related to another bug that has already been reported?
    • Would solving one bug help the other?
  6. Is the bug reported under the correct bugzilla component (source package)?
    • See determining the correct component
    • For example, if someone reported a problem running Firefox in GNOME, should the bug be filed under Firefox or GNOME?
  7. Is the bug reporting more than one problem--a Two-in-one bug.
    • Should this bug be split into two bugs?
    • If you aren't sure get a second opinion from another triager or developer on IRC.
  8. Is the bug already fixed?
    • If someone has confirmed it is fixed add a comment to that affect and close it.
    • If a fix has not been confirmed suggest trying the latest build from Koji Build System

Going Deeper