From Fedora Project Wiki
m (Mattdm moved page Talk:CloudCloud PRD to Talk:Cloud/Cloud PRD) |
(suggestions from hguemar) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should Pivotal Cloud Foundry be in scope for PaaS? --[[User:Stahnma|Stahnma]] ([[User talk:Stahnma|talk]]) 17:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC) | Should Pivotal Cloud Foundry be in scope for PaaS? --[[User:Stahnma|Stahnma]] ([[User talk:Stahnma|talk]]) 17:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
--- | |||
== Suggestions from [[User:hguemar|hguemar]] == | |||
=== Use cases === | |||
Drop | |||
* PaaS node images (until OpenShift or another PaaS comes back on Fedora repo) | |||
* Big data images (not much move) | |||
Modify the following to include docker containers | |||
* Simple deployment | |||
=== Features === | |||
Drop | |||
* Docker image (transferred to another WG) | |||
* Big data tools | |||
=== Atomic Host === | |||
The PRD should reflect the Atomic Host importance in our strategy. | |||
Revision as of 20:30, 1 June 2015
Should Pivotal Cloud Foundry be in scope for PaaS? --Stahnma (talk) 17:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
---
Suggestions from hguemar
Use cases
Drop
- PaaS node images (until OpenShift or another PaaS comes back on Fedora repo)
- Big data images (not much move)
Modify the following to include docker containers
- Simple deployment
Features
Drop
- Docker image (transferred to another WG)
- Big data tools
Atomic Host
The PRD should reflect the Atomic Host importance in our strategy.