From Fedora Project Wiki
m (Fix typo) |
(Add one more question from mitr prior sending questions to candidates) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==== What technical criteria should be established for products to be accepted as a new Fedora product or the other way, to be removed from the list of supported products. Should this apply for implicit three products too? ==== | ==== What technical criteria should be established for products to be accepted as a new Fedora product or the other way, to be removed from the list of supported products. Should this apply for implicit three products too? ==== | ||
==== On the spectrum between ABI stability for third-party applications, and maximum innovation with no API stability, where should Fedora lie in your opinion? ==== | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
Revision as of 10:09, 8 July 2014
The question collection period is closed
The collection period ended at 23:59:59 UTC on July 07, 2014.
The collection period ended at 23:59:59 UTC on July 07, 2014.
The following special elections will take place in July 2014:
- FESCo (Engineering) (three seats)
All dates and times noted are UTC time.
Please add questions you'd like to see asked to this page.
Candiates, don't post your answers yet
Once the questionnaire period is over, the Elections Wrangler will collect the answers and post them at the same time. This attempts to make things more even and fair for candidates to be open with their answers and not copy from earlier responses.
Once the questionnaire period is over, the Elections Wrangler will collect the answers and post them at the same time. This attempts to make things more even and fair for candidates to be open with their answers and not copy from earlier responses.
CLOSED The questionnaire is closed. No further questions will now be added. Please do not modify this page!
Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo)
Questions
What is the role of FESCo in your opinion? What is it to do or not to do?
Where do you see Fedora in the next year? Next five years?
What is your priority for Fedora?
If you could change one thing about how FESCo has operated traditionally, what would it be?
How do you see FESCo working with the Fedora product Working Groups?
What will you be able to accomplish if elected, that you couldn't as an unelected contributor?
What technical criteria should be established for products to be accepted as a new Fedora product or the other way, to be removed from the list of supported products. Should this apply for implicit three products too?
On the spectrum between ABI stability for third-party applications, and maximum innovation with no API stability, where should Fedora lie in your opinion?
History
Questions from previous elections can be found here: