No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
for discussion and will be deleted from the final document. | for discussion and will be deleted from the final document. | ||
= Introduction = | |||
The Fedora MinGW project's mission is to provide an excellent | The Fedora MinGW project's mission is to provide an excellent | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?fl=c010b6ca7d68;file=example/mingw-example.spec | http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?fl=c010b6ca7d68;file=example/mingw-example.spec | ||
= Track Fedora native package versions = | |||
In general terms, MinGW packages which provide cross-compiled versions | In general terms, MinGW packages which provide cross-compiled versions | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
aligned. | aligned. | ||
= Follow Fedora policy = | |||
MinGW packages must follow Fedora policy, except where noted in this | MinGW packages must follow Fedora policy, except where noted in this | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
admin process etc as other Fedora packages. | admin process etc as other Fedora packages. | ||
= Package naming = | |||
Packages should be named by prefixing the upstream package name | Packages should be named by prefixing the upstream package name | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
(b) we may want to build 64 bit binaries. | (b) we may want to build 64 bit binaries. | ||
= Base packages = | |||
The base packages provide a root filesystem, base libraries, binutils | The base packages provide a root filesystem, base libraries, binutils | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
names as Debian (minus the unnecessary '32' which Debian has in the name). | names as Debian (minus the unnecessary '32' which Debian has in the name). | ||
= Filesystem layout = | |||
[root] | [root] | ||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
+- man | +- man | ||
= Filenames of the cross-compilers and binutils = | |||
The cross-compilers and binutils are Fedora binaries and are therefore | The cross-compilers and binutils are Fedora binaries and are therefore | ||
Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
prefix. | prefix. | ||
= Naming of the root filesystem = | |||
The root filesystem contains Windows executables and DLLs and any other Windows-only | The root filesystem contains Windows executables and DLLs and any other Windows-only | ||
Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
it is still a directory located directly under /usr), and is what MinGW expects. | it is still a directory located directly under /usr), and is what MinGW expects. | ||
= Standard mingw RPM macros = | |||
The <code>mingw-filesystem</code> package provides a number of | The <code>mingw-filesystem</code> package provides a number of | ||
Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
submitted to Fedora. | submitted to Fedora. | ||
== Toolchain macros == | |||
The following macros are for the %build and %install section of the spec | The following macros are for the %build and %install section of the spec | ||
Line 209: | Line 209: | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Filesystem location macros == | |||
The following macros are for use in %build, %install and %files sections of the RPM spec | The following macros are for use in %build, %install and %files sections of the RPM spec | ||
Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
|} | |} | ||
= Dependencies = | |||
If a package contains binaries which depend on a DLL provided by | If a package contains binaries which depend on a DLL provided by | ||
Line 265: | Line 265: | ||
and any other BuildRequires that they need. | and any other BuildRequires that they need. | ||
= Build architecture = | |||
All packages should have: | All packages should have: | ||
Line 277: | Line 277: | ||
architecture was used to build or host them. | architecture was used to build or host them. | ||
= Libraries (DLLs) = | |||
All libraries must be built as DLLs. | All libraries must be built as DLLs. | ||
Line 297: | Line 297: | ||
(eg. <code>foo-0.dll</code>). | (eg. <code>foo-0.dll</code>). | ||
== Do not use %{_mingw_bindir}/* or %{_mingw_libdir}/* in %files section == | |||
The <code>%files</code> section must list DLLs separately. Packages | The <code>%files</code> section must list DLLs separately. Packages | ||
Line 308: | Line 308: | ||
this during RPM builds. | this during RPM builds. | ||
== Manpages and info files == | |||
If manpages or info files are simply duplicates of equivalent | If manpages or info files are simply duplicates of equivalent | ||
Line 314: | Line 314: | ||
packaged in the MinGW package. | packaged in the MinGW package. | ||
== Static libraries == | |||
In accordance with ordinary Fedora policy, static libraries should not | In accordance with ordinary Fedora policy, static libraries should not | ||
Line 324: | Line 324: | ||
executables. | executables. | ||
== Stripping == | |||
Libraries and executables should be stripped. This is done correctly | Libraries and executables should be stripped. This is done correctly |
Revision as of 15:03, 21 September 2008
Packaging Guidelines for MinGW Windows cross-compiler
Please note this is a draft. "Rationale" sections are for discussion and will be deleted from the final document.
Introduction
The Fedora MinGW project's mission is to provide an excellent development environment for Fedora users who wish to cross-compile their programs to run on Windows, minimizing the need to use Windows at all. In the past developers have had to port and compile all of the libraries and tools they have needed, and this huge effort has happened independently many times over. We aim to eliminate duplication of work for application developers by providing a range of libraries and development tools which have already been ported to the cross-compiler environment. This means that developers will not need to recompile the application stack themselves, but can concentrate just on the changes needed to their own application.
Note that when deciding to contribute a new library to the Fedora MinGW project, it is advisable to start with our example specfile: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?fl=c010b6ca7d68;file=example/mingw-example.spec
Track Fedora native package versions
In general terms, MinGW packages which provide cross-compiled versions of packages already natively available in Fedora, should follow the native Fedora package as closely as possible. This means they should stay at the same version, include all the same patches as the native Fedora package, and be built with the same configuration options.
The MinGW SIG have written an RPM comparison tool which makes it possible to compare MinGW packages with the Fedora native packages, in order to determine whether versions, patches and configuration are aligned.
Follow Fedora policy
MinGW packages must follow Fedora policy, except where noted in this document. MinGW packages go through the same review process, CVS admin process etc as other Fedora packages.
Package naming
Packages should be named by prefixing the upstream package name
with mingw-
Rationale Debian name their packages mingw32-*
.
However I can't see a reason for including '32' in the name,
particularly since (a) the upstream package is just called mingw and
(b) we may want to build 64 bit binaries.
Base packages
The base packages provide a root filesystem, base libraries, binutils
(basic programs like 'strip', 'ld' etc), the compiler (gcc) and the
Win32 API. Packages may need to depend on one or more of these. In
particular, almost any conceivable package should depend on
mingw-filesystem
and mingw-runtime
.
mingw-filesystem |
Core filesystem directory layout, and RPM macros for spec files. Equivalent to 'filesystem' RPM |
mingw-runtime |
Base libraries for core MinGW runtime & development environment. Equivalent to glibc & glibc-devel RPMs |
mingw-binutils |
Cross-compiled binutils (utilities like 'strip', 'as', 'ld') which understand Windows executables and DLLs. Equivalent to 'binutils' RPM |
mingw-w32api |
Win32 API. A free (public domain) reimplementation of the header files required to link to the Win32 API. No direct equivalent in base Fedora - glibc-devel is closest |
mingw-gcc |
GNU compiler collection. Compilers for C and C++ which cross-compile to a Windows target. Equivalent to gcc RPM |
Rationale I've used the same names as the upstream packages, and also the same names as Debian (minus the unnecessary '32' which Debian has in the name).
Filesystem layout
[root] | +- etc | | | +- rpm | | | +- macros.mingw | +- usr | +- bin - Links to cross compiler toolchain | | | +- i686-pc-mingw-cpp | +- i686-pc-mingw-gcc | +- i686-pc-mingw-g++ | +- ... etc.. | +- lib | | | +- rpm | | | +- mingw-defs - custom helper scripts for auto-requires, binary stripping, etc | +- mingw-find-provides.sh - extra DLL names | +- mingw-find-requires.sh - discover required DLL names | +- i686-pc-mingw - root of mingw toolchain and binaries - see next diagram
[mingw-root] | +- bin - Cross compiler toolchain | | | +- cpp | +- gcc | +- g++ | +- ... etc ... | +- lib - Cross compiler toolchain support libraries / files | +- sys-root - root for cross compiled binaries | +- mingw | +- bin - cross-compiled binaries & runtime DLL parts +- doc - documentation +- include - include files for cross compiled libs +- lib - cross-compiled static libraries & linktime DLL parts | | | +- pkgconfig - pkg-config definitions for libraries | +- share | +- man
Filenames of the cross-compilers and binutils
The cross-compilers and binutils are Fedora binaries and are therefore
placed in %{_bindir}
(ie. /usr/bin
)
according to the FHS and Fedora guidelines.
The cross-compilers and binutils which generate i686 binaries for Windows are named:
%{_bindir}/i686-pc-mingw32-gcc %{_bindir}/i686-pc-mingw32-g++ %{_bindir}/i686-pc-mingw32-ld %{_bindir}/i686-pc-mingw32-as %{_bindir}/i686-pc-mingw32-strip etc.
The same binaries are present in
%{_prefix}/i686-pc-mingw32/bin
without any prefix in the
name, ie:
%{_prefix}/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/gcc %{_prefix}/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/g++ %{_prefix}/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/ld %{_prefix}/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as %{_prefix}/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/strip etc.
Rationale This is the name which autoconf configure scripts
expect when they are invoked in cross-compiling mode. The
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin
directory is required by GCC,
otherwise it invokes the wrong assembler and linker. Note that we
don't support generating x86-64 Windows binaries (or any other
architecture) at the moment, but if we do those will have a different
prefix.
Naming of the root filesystem
The root filesystem contains Windows executables and DLLs and any other Windows-only files. It is necessary both because we need to store Windows libraries in order to link further libraries which depend on them, and also because MinGW requires a root filesystem location. The location (for i686 target) is provided by the macro:
%{_mingw_sysroot} %{_prefix}/i686-pc-mingw/sys-root
Rationale This is what the existing Fedora packages do, and very similar to what Debian is doing (they use a different and inconsistent name, but it is still a directory located directly under /usr), and is what MinGW expects.
Standard mingw RPM macros
The mingw-filesystem
package provides a number of
convenience macros for the cross compiled sysroot directories, and
toolchain. It is mandatory to use these macros in all mingw packages
submitted to Fedora.
Toolchain macros
The following macros are for the %build and %install section of the spec
_mingw_ar | i686-pc-mingw32-ar | cross compiler 'ar' binary |
_mingw_cc | i686-pc-mingw32-gcc | cross compiler 'gcc' binary |
_mingw_cflags | -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 | Rationale: we need to remove the -m64 flag from standard RPM_OPTS_FLAGS |
_mingw_configure | CC="%{_mingw_cc}" CFLAGS="%{_mingw_cflags}" ./configure --build=%_build --host=%{_mingw_host} --target=%{_mingw_target} --prefix=%{_mingw_prefix} | standard invocation for autotools 'configure' scripts |
_mingw_cpp | i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -E | cross compiler 'cpp' binary |
_mingw_host | i686-pc-mingw32 | Host platform for build |
_mingw_objdump | i686-pc-mingw32-objdump | cross compiler 'objdump' binary |
_mingw_ranlib | i686-pc-mingw32-ranlib | cross compiler 'ranlib' binary |
_mingw_strip | i686-pc-mingw32-strip | cross compiler 'strip' binary |
_mingw_target | i686-pc-mingw32 | Target platform for build |
Filesystem location macros
The following macros are for use in %build, %install and %files sections of the RPM spec
_mingw_bindir | %{_mingw_prefix}/bin | Location of Windows executables. |
_mingw_datadir | %{_mingw_prefix}/share | Shared data used under Windows. |
_mingw_docdir | %{_mingw_prefix}/share/doc | Documentation. |
_mingw_infodir | %{_mingw_prefix}/share/info | Info files (see note below). |
_mingw_includedir | %{_mingw_prefix}/include | Header files used when cross-compiling for Windows. |
_mingw_libdir | %{_mingw_prefix}/lib | Windows libraries (see sections below). |
_mingw_libexecdir | %{_mingw_prefix}/libexec | |
_mingw_mandir | %{_mingw_prefix}/share/man | Man pages (see note below). |
_mingw_prefix | %{_mingw_sysroot}/mingw | Windows equivalent of %{_prefix}, required by MinGW. |
_mingw_sbindir | %{_mingw_prefix}/sbin | |
_mingw_sysconfdir | %{_mingw_prefix}/etc | Configuration files used when running under Windows. |
_mingw_sysroot | %{_prefix}/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root | Windows system root. |
Dependencies
If a package contains binaries which depend on a DLL provided by another package, these dependencies should be expressed in the form:
mingw(foo.dll)
where foo.dll
is the name of the DLL. The name must be
converted to lowercase because Windows binaries contain case
insensitive dependencies.
All packages should depend on mingw-filesystem
.
Correct dependency generation is done automatically. Packagers should include these lines in all library packages:
%define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 %define __find_requires %{_mingw_findrequires} %define __find_provides %{_mingw_findprovides}
All specfiles should BuildRequire at least:
BuildRequires: mingw-filesystem >= minimum-version
and any other BuildRequires that they need.
Build architecture
All packages should have:
BuildArch: noarch
unless they contain Fedora native executables.
Rationale Windows executables always target 32 bit x86 at present, and so (in theory) should be identical whatever Fedora architecture was used to build or host them.
Libraries (DLLs)
All libraries must be built as DLLs.
Because of the peculiarity of Windows, DLLs are stored in the
%{_mingw_bindir}
directory, along with a control file in
the %{_mingw_libdir}
directory. For example, for a
library called foo
there would be:
%{_mingw_bindir}/foo.dll %{_mingw_bindir}/foo.def %{_mingw_libdir}/foo.dll.a %{_mingw_libdir}/foo.la
All files are required in those locations in order to link
successfully, except that the .def
file is not always
built by libtool for reasons unknown, and the .dll
may
contain a version number although not always
(eg. foo-0.dll
).
Do not use %{_mingw_bindir}/* or %{_mingw_libdir}/* in %files section
The %files
section must list DLLs separately. Packages
must NOT use %{_mingw_bindir}/*
or
%{_mingw_libdir}/*
Rationale Libtool is very fragile and will give up on building
a DLL very easily. Therefore we force the name of the DLL to be
listed explicitly in the %files
section in order to catch
this during RPM builds.
Manpages and info files
If manpages or info files are simply duplicates of equivalent documentation found in Fedora native packages, then they should not be packaged in the MinGW package.
Static libraries
In accordance with ordinary Fedora policy, static libraries should not
be built, and if they are then they should be placed in a
-static
subpackage.
The exception is the base package mingw-w32api
which
contains static libraries that are required for GCC to create
executables.
Stripping
Libraries and executables should be stripped. This is done correctly and automatically if the spec file includes these lines:
%define __strip %{_mingw_strip} %define __objdump %{_mingw_objdump}
(Note that if __strip and __objdump are not overridden in the specfile then this can sometimes cause Windows binaries to be corrupted).