(→FAS dump breakage: cap titles, references beside active verb, code tags for technical quote) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Contributing Writer: [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]] | Contributing Writer: [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]] | ||
=== | === Why Puppet uses config instead of configs === | ||
[[ | [[SusmitShannigrahi|susmit shannigrahi]] asked[1] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list asked why, in the fedora-infrastructure implementation of puppet when we add a new file, in the .pp file the path is written as puppet:///config where as the actual path of the file is in the configs directory. To this Jeroen van Meeuwen answered [2] by saying that the [config] fileserver mount may point to /path/to/configs which may allow this discrepancy to exist. | ||
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/ | [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00084.html | ||
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00085.html | |||
=== FAS Dump Breakage === | === FAS Dump Breakage === |
Revision as of 06:19, 26 January 2009
Infrastructure
This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-infrastructure-list
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure
Contributing Writer: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
Why Puppet uses config instead of configs
susmit shannigrahi asked[1] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list asked why, in the fedora-infrastructure implementation of puppet when we add a new file, in the .pp file the path is written as puppet:///config where as the actual path of the file is in the configs directory. To this Jeroen van Meeuwen answered [2] by saying that the [config] fileserver mount may point to /path/to/configs which may allow this discrepancy to exist.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00084.html
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-January/msg00085.html
FAS Dump Breakage
Michael Schwendt wrote[2] on the @fedora-infrastructure-list that there has been an invalid entry returned by the FAS group dump for some time: bbs,disabled,james francis toy iv,user,0
.
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-October/msg00089.html
To this Nigel Jones added[2] that "The comma is part of the persons name, it needs to be either escaped or the delimiter changed (maybe a | or something)." Mike, however, said[3] that there aren't any comma's in that persons name, its in his email address.
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-October/msg00090.html
[3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2008-October/msg00092.html