Chrismurphy (talk | contribs) (initial copy) |
Chrismurphy (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Relocate RPM | = Relocate RPM database to /usr = | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
<pre>/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm</pre> | <pre>/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm</pre> | ||
This will be done by creating making [code]/var/lib/rpm[/code] a symlink pointing to <code>/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm</code> | |||
The proposal is to apply the new location only to new clean installs only. It will not apply to upgrades. | |||
There will be no change to DNF as part of this change proposal. DNF's history will remain in `/var` until DNF 5. Discussion continues about the effect of a snapshot+rollback regime on DNF history. [http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-ecosystem/2021-December/000769.html Relocate DNF history to /usr.] | |||
== Feedback == | == Feedback == |
Revision as of 16:36, 28 December 2021
Relocate RPM database to /usr
Summary
Currently, the RPM databases is located in /var
. Let's move it to /usr
.
Owner
- Name: Chris Murphy
- Email: chrismurphy@fedoraproject.org
- Name: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Email: salimma@fedoraproject.org
Current status
- Targeted release: Fedora Linux 36
- Last updated: 2021-12-28
- FESCo issue: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
- Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
- Release notes tracker: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
Detailed Description
Current location
/var/lib/rpm
New location
/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
This will be done by creating making [code]/var/lib/rpm[/code] a symlink pointing to /usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
The proposal is to apply the new location only to new clean installs only. It will not apply to upgrades.
There will be no change to DNF as part of this change proposal. DNF's history will remain in /var
until DNF 5. Discussion continues about the effect of a snapshot+rollback regime on DNF history. Relocate DNF history to /usr.
Feedback
Benefit to Fedora
- The RPM and DNF databases describe the state of (primarily)
/usr
. Storing these databases in/usr
will more easily facilitate OS rollback, without affecting/var
.
- Helps align Fedora variants with each other
- rpm-ostree based systems (including CoreOS, IoT, Silverblue, Kinoite) already use
/usr/lib/sysimage
for rpmdb.
- rpm-ostree based systems (including CoreOS, IoT, Silverblue, Kinoite) already use
- Consistency with another RPM-based distro, (open)SUSE has made this change
Scope
- Proposal owners:
- changes in rpm and dnf-data packages
- create the new path instead of old
- create symlinks for the old path to new path
- changes in rpm and dnf-data packages
- Other developers:
- changes in SElinux policy
- Release engineering: #Releng issue 10441
- Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
- Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
- Alignment with Objectives:
Upgrade/compatibility impact
Change will be applied on upgrades to Fedora 36.
How To Test
- Clean install or upgrade an existing Fedora system
- Note the changed database paths (new location) and symlinks in the old location
- Check that
rpm
anddnf
commands work as expected, e.g.
dnf history rpm -qa
User Experience
Users will notice:
- symlinks in the old locations for the databases, pointing to the new locations;
- paths existing in the new locations.
Otherwise, the change should be invisible to users.
Dependencies
rpm-ostree
probably should make/usr/share/rpm
a symlink to/usr/lib/sysimage/rpm
, rather than the reverse as it is currently.PackageKit
might use inotify on/var/lib/rpm
need to check if it does and whether it should be changed or add the additional path
Contingency Plan
- Contingency mechanism: Revert the change, try again the next Fedora release.
- Contingency deadline: Beta freeze
- Blocks release? Yes