Talk:Israwhidebroken.com Proposal: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:15, 12 June 2009

markmc Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?

Revision as of 10:12, 12 June 2009 (view source) Markmc (talk \| contribs) m (Created page with '* User:Markmc:markmc Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA...')		Revision as of 10:15, 12 June 2009 (view source) Markmc (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* [[User:Markmc:markmc]] Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?		* [[User:Markmc\|markmc]] Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?