Talk:Israwhidebroken.com Proposal: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:35, 15 June 2009

Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?

"if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken": Sure, if we were doing everything else right this wouldn't be necessary. But relying on that assumption is just a way to avoid solving the problem. And we've had the problem for the past 5 years. Nothing makes me think it's magically going to go away now.
"what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?": We won't know until we try. Even if it's only happening every three days, or weekly - it's still better than what we have now.

---WillWoods 18:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-* [[User:Markmc|markmc]] Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?
+<!-- sign your comment by putting this on the last line:
+---~~~~
+-->
+* Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?
+---[[User:Markmc|markmc]]
+* ''"if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken"'': Sure, if we were doing everything else right this wouldn't be necessary. But relying on that assumption is just a way to avoid solving the problem. And we've had the problem for the past 5 years. Nothing makes me think it's magically going to go away now.
+* ''"what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?"'': We won't know until we try. Even if it's only happening every three days, or weekly - it's still better than what we have now.
+---[[User:Wwoods|WillWoods]] 18:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)